Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T03CM01512
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 04/14/2003 | EROSE1 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 04/14/2003 | EROSE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 04/14/2003 | EROSE1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 04/14/2003 | WILDAN | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2000 IBC, 1997 UAC, 2000 IMC, 1998 IECC, 1999 NEC codes with local modifications and the 1994 UPC with State of Arizona amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. 2. The Code Analysis Data on Sheet T-1 shows this commercial kitchen remodel as a "B Office" occupancy. However, Sheet SP-1 shows the existing kitchen to be associated with the dining facilities for an I-1, Nursing Home facility with some office administrative space. Thus, the entire facility comprises occupancy groups A-2, B, and I-1. Please revise. Since the kitchen remodel does not change the existing building area, the area calculations appear to be irrelevant. However, the areas listed on Sheet SP-1 are confusing. The totals in the tabulation do not add correctly; nor match the areas shown on the site plan. The Kitchen, Dining Room and Indoor Rec/Dining Room areas total 6,105 s.f.; while the plan shows 8,486 s.f. for the A-2 Occupancy alone. Please review and clarify/resolve the discrepancies. 3. The north portion of the Site Plan shows 'B' Occupancies; yet the floor plans appear to be bedrooms with baths similar to the I-1 Occupancy? Please clarify. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: 1. The demolition plans have been reviewed and approved. Sheet A-1 1. The Partial Floor Plan shows doors 269 and 270; however, the Door Schedule does not list these two doors. Please resolve. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: 1. The structural calculations for the roof support for the new make-up air unit has been reviewed and approved. PLUMBING COMMENTS: 1. The plumbing plans have been reviewed and approved. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Sheet M-1 and M-2 1. A Type II Hood is indicated over commercial food heat-processing appliances, per Detail 6/M-2. 2000 IMC Section 507.2 requires a Type I Hood for this installing; therefore, there should be two Type I Hoods shown. 2. A Type II Hood is required over Commercial Dishwashing Machines, unless the dishwasher is an under-counter type, per 2000 IMC Section 507.2, Exception #2. Please justify lack of hood. 3. Sheet M-2 shows "Minimum 6" clearance. Duct systems serving Type I Hoods shall have a clearance to combustible construction of 18 inches (457 mm). Reference IMC 506.3.7. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: 1. The electrical plans have been reviewed and approved. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: 1. The building is existing and pre-dates the adoption of the Energy Codes and no significant change to the building envelope is indicated. 2. The lighting energy usage for this remodel is shown to comply with 1998 IECC Table 705.4. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: 1. The plan has been reviewed and accepted for accessibility. |
| 04/14/2003 | EROSE1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |