Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T03CM01432
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2004 | Daniel Castro | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next Submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments Regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were Addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of two separate parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. Attached to the yellow site plan card is a copy of the City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. Contact the Assessors office for a copy of the Tax Combination form. 2. Note the administrative address, which the site plan will be reviewed under. An address certificate has been attached to the site card and the address noted on the site card indicating the site address as 30 E. Vivian Drive. Remove the other address shown on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3) 3. Note the height of all proposed buildings on the plan. Building setback requirements may not be verified for compliance until this information has been provided. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 4. Since the number of units in a building has changed from four (4) separate duplexes to two (2) four (4) unit buildings, handicap parking is now required. Four (4) or more attached units require handicap parking. Provide a fully dimensioned detail for the handicap parking space/s and disabled access aisle/s. In addition, please detail access ramps. (ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 5. Under general note four (4), please note the number of units proposed and the number of bedrooms in each unit to verify vehicle parking requirements. Refer to LUC Sec. 3.3.4 "Multi-family dwelling 0-70 units/acre". (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4) 6. Revise the number of bicycle parking spaces required to two (2) Class II spaces under general note number three (3). In addition note the class type provided as "Class II". (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4) 7. 90 degree vehicle parking spaces require a 24 foot wide PAAL to back out onto. Revise the PAAL width to 24 feet where vehicle parking spaces are located. (LUC Table 3.3.7-I) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11) 8. Add the (R-2) zoning classification for the adjacent property to the south. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) 9. Add the existing and proposed use as a general note. The proposed use should be noted as follows: "Family Dwelling development designator K, subject to: LUC Sec. 3.5.7.1.F." (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) 10. Provide as a general note the residential density calculation (maximum number of units allowed/number of units proposed). Refer to LUC Sec. 3.2.10 for information. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3) 11. Provide as a general note the lot coverage calculation: (maximum allowed lot coverage 70%, proposed lot coverage ?) Lot coverage is comprised of the total first floor building area plus vehicular use area (drives, parking spaces) divided by the gross site area. (LUC Sec. 3.2.9) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3) 12. The previously requested Airport Hazard District (AHD) information was not provided under general note 6. Please contact me for an explanation of the AHD requirements and the information which is required to be noted on the plan. (LUC Sec. 2.8.5.7.) 13. Add the following general note: "This site is within Noise Control District-70 which requires that all site-built residential uses be provided with insulation to reduce the interior noise level to an Ldn of 45 or less, as specified by the Building Code." (LUC Sec. 2.8.5.6.B) 14. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. (D.S. 2-07.2.1.A) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/30/2004 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 is required along all street frontages. The border must be a minimum of ten feet wide, except for approved ingress/egress locations. 2) Provide a landscape plan in accordance with DS 2-07.0 that include all required content. 3) Include plant sizes, common and scientific names for all plants, and a corresponding symbol. DS 2-07.2.2 4) Interior landscape borders are required along all sides of the property, except for streets which require street landscape borders.. Revise the plans to include the required plantings. LUC 3.7.2.4 5) A five foot high masonry wall is required between parking areas on the site and any adjacent residentially zoned properties. LUC 3.7.3 6) Parking areas on the site are required to be screened per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 7) Per LUC 3.7.2.7 "All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution". Identify all proposed ground plane treatments. 8) An irrigation plan is required. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 9) The refuse storage area is to be screened from the street per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The screen wall may not obstruct the sight visibility triangles. LUC 3.7.3.4 10) Stormwater retention areas are required to be landscaped in accordance DS 10-01.0. LUC 3.7.4.3.A 11) Per DS 3-05.2.3.C.3 parked vehicles may not obstruct the sidewalk areas. 12) A native plant preservation plan is required. LUC 3.8 13) Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 "A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. 14) Retention basins are required to be landscaped per DS 10-01.0, LUC 3.7.4.3.A 15) The landscape plan may require additional modification pending determination of native plant preservation requirements. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0 |
| 04/30/2004 | Doug Williams | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Site Review-30 E. Vivian Drive REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 3 May 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM01432 T15S, R13E, Section 12 SMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Drainage Report and Site Plan received on 9 April 2004. All previous comments provided on December 3, 2003 have not been addressed. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The following comments must be addressed: SITE PLAN 1. Previous comment #2, "Label and dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed sidewalks, driveways and utility lines", has not been adequately addressed. Provide dimensioning to gas and water lines from street monument lines (DS 2-02.2.1.21). 2. Depict and label new 4' sidewalks, 3 feet from back of existing curb, in accordance with Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) Standard Detail (SD) 200, along Dunton Avenue and Vivian Drive property frontages. New sidewalk and curb access ramps (SD 207) are required as a part of development of all new projects, along the entire length of street frontages (DS 3-01.3.3 A). 3. Depict and label new driveway aprons at both ingress/egress locations, in accordance with PC/COT SD 206. Please note that the minimum distance between driveways is 12 feet, in accordance with Chapter 25, Tucson Code. Please depict and /or indicate distances to nearest adjacent driveways, demonstrating compliance with this requirement. 4. Access to the refuse container does not comply with Development Standard 6-01.0 for new developments. Provide/depict an onsite centralized refuse provision, with vehicle maneuverability and access onsite, on a revised plan, in accordance with this standard. A Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) is required for deviation from the requirements outlined in this section (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.4.1). 5. Please ensure the dumpster enclosure bollards/post barricades are depicted within the interior of the enclosure walls - rear and side walls - as specified in 6-01.4.2 C 2. 6. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible. Please ensure water harvesting maximization notes/details are provided on a revised site plan, or a landscape plan with a resubmittal (Land Use Code; Section 3.7.4.3 B and DS 10-02.0, Section 14.2.10). 7. The site plan must demonstrate continued acceptance of existing offsite flows at the southwest corner and southern boundary, as noted in the drainage submittal. Revise the plan accordingly, with clear indication of acceptance of offsite flows (see drainage report comment # 3, below). DRAINAGE REPORT: 1. Revise paragraph 2, page 1, and the last sentence on page 2, to reflect current balanced basin requirements that detention facilities be incorporated into all new developments regardless of size or land use density to the extent necessary to ensure the post-development 2- 10- and 100-year peak discharges from the site will not exceed the pre-development values, per the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0, Sections 1.4 and 2.1). 2. Revise/omit discussion and reference to Section 2.1.3 of the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM - DS 10-02.0), in paragraph 3, page 1, and the reference to critical basin applicability in paragraph 3, page 2, to reflect/discuss balanced basin detention requirements for this site (see item 1, above) (DS 10-01.0, Sections 1.4 & 2.1 and DS 10-02.0, Sec. 2.1.1). 3. Paragraph 5, page 2 discusses a series of curb openings along the southern property line, whereas the Hydraulics section discusses swales along both the south and west property lines, and the Conclusions section proposes all runoff from the south be accepted at one 5' curb opening at the southeastern corner. Revise discussions and provide consistent recommendations for onsite acceptance and conveyance along the south boundary. Please ensure all changes are consistent with the accompanying site plan. 4. Revise the last sentence under the Hydraulics section. New sidewalks are required as part of this development. Provide a scupper detail with calculations for conveyance of 100% of the 10-year flow under the sidewalk, minimum (DS 3-01.4.4 F). GENERAL COMMENT: A grading permit will be required for this project. Please complete and submit a grading permit application with two sets of grading plans. The permit application/plans may be included with a revised site plan and drainage report resubmittal addressing all of the comments provided above. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us Doug Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 04/30/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | A native plant preservation plan is required. LUC 3.8 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/04/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |