Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM01353
Parcel: 14002001A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM01353
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/19/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. MINIMUM 20' WIDE, PAVED, FIRE ACCESS ROADWAY MUST BE PROVIDED AND EXTENDED TO WITHIN 150 FEET OF ALL PORTIONS OF THE FACILITY PER 2000 IFC SEC 503.
2. FIRE HYDRANTS REQUIRED PER 2000 IFC SEC. 508.
04/04/2003 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied Refer to Zoning Review comments.
04/04/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next , submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Per letter of interpretation from Walter Tellez (Zoning Administrator) dated March 18, 2003, the principal land use class for this site is as follows: Auctions "34", subject to: Section 3.5.9.4. Please revise the proposed land use class noted on sheet AS1.1 as required. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31)

2. Revise the vehicle parking calculation to be based on the land use class "Auctions (outdoor)" as listed under L.U.C. Sec. 3.3.4. One (1) space per 100 sq. ft. of swap meet (auction) area, excluding vehicular use areas. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8)

3. Please provide a fully dimensioned disabled parking space detail, which complies with ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 sections 406 and 502 curbs, ramps, and parking spaces. The number of disabled parking spaces required may not be verified for compliance until the number of vehicle parking spaces required for this site is verified.

4. Provide wheel stop curbing for the parking spaces abutting the five (5) foot sidewalk. Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2, the wheel stop must be located two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking space.

5. Will the temporary modular offices be used while the permanent office building is constructed and then be removed? If so, a temporary use permit (TUP) will be required for the temporary office buildings. The TUP must be approved prior to site plan approval. Please contact Bill Balak at 791-5550 for TUP information. If not, then the temporary office buildings must be included in all calculations (i.e. FAR, vehicle and bicycle parking).

6. Revise the bicycle parking calculation to be based on "Auctions (outdoor)" land use class as listed under L.U.C. 3.3.4. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9)

7. Indicate graphically and by note the location of the bicycle parking facilities on the plan.

8. Provide a fully dimensioned layout of the bicycle parking including materials for paving, specific type of rack, and the number of bicycles it supports. Per D.S. 2-09.6.2, a five (5) foot access aisle measured from the front or rear of the 72 inch long parking space must be provided beside each row or between two (2) rows of bicycle parking.

9. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10)

10. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.A, a sidewalk is required from the building to the Irvington road right-of-way. Minimum width required is four (4) feet. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12)

11. Provide a detail of proposed free standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25)

12. Under the off street loading calculation please add the following note: "This project does not require a loading zone." (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5)

13. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20)

14. Label and dimension the future curb location for Irvington Road. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21)

15. Dimension the building setback from the back of future curb location.

16. Label the zoning classification for the adjacent properties on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28)

17. Indicate the location of the refuse container on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32)

18. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
04/14/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Insurance Auto Auction
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 15 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM01353

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan received on 4 April, 2003. Approval of the Site Plan may not occur prior to drainage report approval, and is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE REPORT:
1. Specify the name, address, and telephone number of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, and liability of the drainage improvements proposed within this development, in accordance with the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), section 2.3.1.2 E - Development Standard (DS) 10-02.0;
2. Provide a detailed Detention/Retention basin maintenance checklist and schedule, and basin performance criteria for annual and as-needed inspections of the basins and drainageways, addressing the items specified in the SMDDFM (sections 2.3.1.6 C 1& 2 and 14.3);
3. All floodplains shall be labeled in accordance with one of the options provided in the SMDDFM, section 2.3.1.4 C 7;
4. The report text shall show compliance with balanced basin flow attenuation requirements (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A);
5. Address soil types for the onsite hydrology and revise hydrologic calculations accordingly;
6. Address recommended erosion protection measures, if any, at basin C discharge location;
7. Provide basin B reservoir routing calculations with working- and routing-tables at a minimum, for the 2-10- and 100-year events (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 B 1);
8. Include certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to applicable Local, State, and Federal Floodplain Regulations (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.7 B);
9. The text discusses a 3' spillway at the northeast corner of the parking area, discharging into a basin. Please clarify any proposed drainage structure(s) and conditions at this location;
10. Provide a typical cross section for E-E callout;
11. Include the northerly basin dimensions, and the land area between this and the southern basin, fully labeled, in section D-D; the cross section provided for this location depicts only the one basin;
12. Address basin B discharge location, and provide cross-sections for basins A and B or reference a typical section on figure 4;
13. Provide swale, basin, and inlet/outlet details, elevations and dimensions fully labeled. Include maximum water surface elevations, and limits of 100-year ponding, at a minimum (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 a, d & e);
14. Provide emergency spillways for any basins with embankments, as required by Section 3.3.4 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0.3.3.4);
15. Provide weir flow calculations in the hydraulics section, for all inlet and outlet locations;
16. Finished floors of structures shall be a minimum of one foot above the 100-year water surface elevation of any adjacent detention basin. Check the floor elevation for the proposed building (SMDDFM, sec. 14.2.4);
17. Provide retention basin percolation test results. Test procedures shall be performed in accordance with the recommended procedure of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood Control District. At the time of building permit submittal, a soils report addressing the items listed in section 14.2.6 (SMDDFM) will be required to be submitted;
18. Please correct the location descriptions of the storage lots described in section 4.2, mid-paragraph and the last line (southernmost and northernmost locations appear to be eastern - and westernmost, respectively);
19. Please discuss the retention volume provided in excess of the required minimum volume;

SITE AND GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

1. Depict and label future site visibility triangles (DS 2-02.2.1.10)
2. Depict the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation on the plan (DS 2-02.2.1.15);
3. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
4. Provide a note stating (a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for the operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and retention/detention facilities at least once a year, and that these report will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner(s) agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining said facilities, should the City find the owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities (SMDDFM, sec. 14.3.3);
5. Provide finish grades in the proposed parking area (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
6. Call out concrete headers at the driveway returns, per Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) Standard Detail 213, as recommended in the drainage report.
7. Provide the basis of elevation with benchmark, based on City of Tucson (COT) datum including COT Field Book and Page (DS 2-02.2.23);
8. Dimension and label from street monument lines to existing and future (Major Streets and Routes - MS&R), where applicable, curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (DS 2-02.2.1.21);
9. Depict the proposed refuse container size, location and access thereto, fully labeled and dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.32 and 6-01.0);
10. Retention/detention basin B discharge location has not been adequately addressed in the drainage report - please ensure the site plan matches the proposed discharge location in the revised drainage report.
11. A proposed 3' spillway at the northeast corner of the parking area is discussed in the report, please revise the site plan to include this item, if still proposed with the revised report.
12. Provide spillway, swale, basin, basin inlet/outlet details and dimensions, fully labeled (see items 10-13 above)
13. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B;

GENERAL COMMENTS:

1. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements must be met for this site development, including but not limited to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) addressing the minimum required controls, copy of signed notice of intent sent to Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), et. al. (see enclosure);
2. A grading permit will be required for this development. Grading permit submittal will need a completed grading permit application with three sets of Grading and SWPPP plans with a soils report.

Please address all of the above comments. Resubmittal shall include a revised site and grading plan, drainage report, and should also include a completed grading permit application, SWPPP's and required accompanying documents.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/16/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Insurance Auto Auction
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 15 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM01353

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan received on 4 April, 2003. Approval of the Site Plan may not occur prior to drainage report approval, and is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE REPORT:
1. Specify the name, address, and telephone number of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, and liability of the drainage improvements proposed within this development, in accordance with the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), section 2.3.1.2 E - Development Standard (DS) 10-02.0;
2. Provide a detailed Detention/Retention basin maintenance checklist and schedule, and basin performance criteria for annual and as-needed inspections of the basins and drainageways, addressing the items specified in the SMDDFM (sections 2.3.1.6 C 1& 2 and 14.3);
3. All floodplains shall be labeled in accordance with one of the options provided in the SMDDFM, section 2.3.1.4 C 7;
4. The report text shall show compliance with balanced basin flow attenuation requirements (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A);
5. Address soil types for the onsite hydrology and revise hydrologic calculations accordingly;
6. Address recommended erosion protection measures, if any, at basin C discharge location;
7. Provide basin B reservoir routing calculations with working- and routing-tables at a minimum, for the 2-10- and 100-year events (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 B 1);
8. Include certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to applicable Local, State, and Federal Floodplain Regulations (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.7 B);
9. The text discusses a 3' spillway at the northeast corner of the parking area, discharging into a basin. Please clarify any proposed drainage structure(s) and conditions at this location;
10. Provide a typical cross section for E-E callout;
11. Include the northerly basin dimensions, and the land area between this and the southern basin, fully labeled, in section D-D; the cross section provided for this location depicts only the one basin;
12. Address basin B discharge location, and provide cross-sections for basins A and B or reference a typical section on figure 4;
13. Provide swale, basin, and inlet/outlet details, elevations and dimensions fully labeled. Include maximum water surface elevations, and limits of 100-year ponding, at a minimum (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 a, d & e);
14. Provide emergency spillways for any basins with embankments, as required by Section 3.3.4 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0.3.3.4);
15. Provide weir flow calculations in the hydraulics section, for all inlet and outlet locations;
16. Finished floors of structures shall be a minimum of one foot above the 100-year water surface elevation of any adjacent detention basin. Check the floor elevation for the proposed building (SMDDFM, sec. 14.2.4);
17. Provide retention basin percolation test results. Test procedures shall be performed in accordance with the recommended procedure of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood Control District. At the time of building permit submittal, a soils report addressing the items listed in section 14.2.6 (SMDDFM) will be required to be submitted;
18. Please correct the location descriptions of the storage lots described in section 4.2, mid-paragraph and the last line (southernmost and northernmost locations appear to be eastern - and westernmost, respectively);
19. Please discuss the retention volume provided in excess of the required minimum volume;

SITE AND GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

1. Depict and label future site visibility triangles (DS 2-02.2.1.10)
2. Depict the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation on the plan (DS 2-02.2.1.15);
3. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
4. Provide a note stating (a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for the operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and retention/detention facilities at least once a year, and that these report will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner(s) agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining said facilities, should the City find the owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities (SMDDFM, sec. 14.3.3);
5. Provide finish grades in the proposed parking area (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
6. Call out concrete headers at the driveway returns, per Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) Standard Detail 213, as recommended in the drainage report.
7. Provide the basis of elevation with benchmark, based on City of Tucson (COT) datum including COT Field Book and Page (DS 2-02.2.23);
8. Dimension and label from street monument lines to existing and future (Major Streets and Routes - MS&R), where applicable, curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (DS 2-02.2.1.21);
9. Depict the proposed refuse container size, location and access thereto, fully labeled and dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.32 and 6-01.0);
10. Retention/detention basin B discharge location has not been adequately addressed in the drainage report - please ensure the site plan matches the proposed discharge location in the revised drainage report.
11. A proposed 3' spillway at the northeast corner of the parking area is discussed in the report, please revise the site plan to include this item, if still proposed with the revised report.
12. Provide spillway, swale, basin, basin inlet/outlet details and dimensions, fully labeled (see items 10-13 above)
13. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B;

GENERAL COMMENTS:

1. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements must be met for this site development, including but not limited to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) addressing the minimum required controls, copy of signed notice of intent sent to Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), et. al. (see enclosure);
2. A grading permit will be required for this development. Grading permit submittal will need a completed grading permit application with three sets of Grading and SWPPP plans with a soils report.

Please address all of the above comments. Resubmittal shall include a revised site and grading plan, drainage report, and should also include a completed grading permit application, SWPPP's and required accompanying documents.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/16/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Insurance Auto Auction
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 15 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM01353

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan received on 4 April, 2003. Approval of the Site Plan may not occur prior to drainage report approval, and is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE REPORT:
1. Specify the name, address, and telephone number of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, and liability of the drainage improvements proposed within this development, in accordance with the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), section 2.3.1.2 E - Development Standard (DS) 10-02.0;
2. Provide a detailed Detention/Retention basin maintenance checklist and schedule, and basin performance criteria for annual and as-needed inspections of the basins and drainageways, addressing the items specified in the SMDDFM (sections 2.3.1.6 C 1& 2 and 14.3);
3. All floodplains shall be labeled in accordance with one of the options provided in the SMDDFM, section 2.3.1.4 C 7;
4. The report text shall show compliance with balanced basin flow attenuation requirements (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A);
5. Address soil types for the onsite hydrology and revise hydrologic calculations accordingly;
6. Address recommended erosion protection measures, if any, at basin C discharge location;
7. Provide basin B reservoir routing calculations with working- and routing-tables at a minimum, for the 2-10- and 100-year events (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 B 1);
8. Include certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to applicable Local, State, and Federal Floodplain Regulations (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.7 B);
9. The text discusses a 3' spillway at the northeast corner of the parking area, discharging into a basin. Please clarify any proposed drainage structure(s) and conditions at this location;
10. Provide a typical cross section for E-E callout;
11. Include the northerly basin dimensions, and the land area between this and the southern basin, fully labeled, in section D-D; the cross section provided for this location depicts only the one basin;
12. Address basin B discharge location, and provide cross-sections for basins A and B or reference a typical section on figure 4;
13. Provide swale, basin, and inlet/outlet details, elevations and dimensions fully labeled. Include maximum water surface elevations, and limits of 100-year ponding, at a minimum (SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 a, d & e);
14. Provide emergency spillways for any basins with embankments, as required by Section 3.3.4 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0.3.3.4);
15. Provide weir flow calculations in the hydraulics section, for all inlet and outlet locations;
16. Finished floors of structures shall be a minimum of one foot above the 100-year water surface elevation of any adjacent detention basin. Check the floor elevation for the proposed building (SMDDFM, sec. 14.2.4);
17. Provide retention basin percolation test results. Test procedures shall be performed in accordance with the recommended procedure of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood Control District. At the time of building permit submittal, a soils report addressing the items listed in section 14.2.6 (SMDDFM) will be required to be submitted;
18. Please correct the location descriptions of the storage lots described in section 4.2, mid-paragraph and the last line (southernmost and northernmost locations appear to be eastern - and westernmost, respectively);
19. Please discuss the retention volume provided in excess of the required minimum volume;

SITE AND GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

1. Depict and label future site visibility triangles (DS 2-02.2.1.10)
2. Depict the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation on the plan (DS 2-02.2.1.15);
3. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
4. Provide a note stating (a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for the operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and retention/detention facilities at least once a year, and that these report will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner(s) agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining said facilities, should the City find the owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities (SMDDFM, sec. 14.3.3);
5. Provide finish grades in the proposed parking area (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
6. Call out concrete headers at the driveway returns, per Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) Standard Detail 213, as recommended in the drainage report.
7. Provide the basis of elevation with benchmark, based on City of Tucson (COT) datum including COT Field Book and Page (DS 2-02.2.23);
8. Dimension and label from street monument lines to existing and future (Major Streets and Routes - MS&R), where applicable, curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (DS 2-02.2.1.21);
9. Depict the proposed refuse container size, location and access thereto, fully labeled and dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.32 and 6-01.0);
10. Retention/detention basin B discharge location has not been adequately addressed in the drainage report - please ensure the site plan matches the proposed discharge location in the revised drainage report.
11. A proposed 3' spillway at the northeast corner of the parking area is discussed in the report, please revise the site plan to include this item, if still proposed with the revised report.
12. Provide spillway, swale, basin, basin inlet/outlet details and dimensions, fully labeled (see items 10-13 above)
13. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B;

GENERAL COMMENTS:

1. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements must be met for this site development, including but not limited to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) addressing the minimum required controls, copy of signed notice of intent sent to Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), et. al. (see enclosure);
2. A grading permit will be required for this development. Grading permit submittal will need a completed grading permit application with three sets of Grading and SWPPP plans with a soils report.

Please address all of the above comments. Resubmittal shall include a revised site and grading plan, drainage report, and should also include a completed grading permit application, SWPPP's and required accompanying documents.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/17/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the plans as requested by the Zoning Reviewer.

2) Revise the plans to include barriers to prevent vehicles from driving onto unpaved portions of the site. DS 3-05.2.3.C

3) Revise the planting plan to eliminate potential conflicts with sight visibility triangles based on the MS&R right of way. DS 3-01.5.0

4) The dust control provisions of LUC 3.7.2.7. apply to the storage bays. Identify the ground surface treatments proposed for these areas.

5) Per LUC 3.7.4.3.A "Storm water detention/retention basins not integrated with paved vehicular use areas shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin." Revise the plans to either include landscaping per DS 10-01.0 or pave the areas to comply with vehicle use area surfacing standards.

6) Clarify more precisely the refuse storage location, if the building provides effective screening from the street additional screen walls may not be required. LUC Table 3.7.2-I
04/17/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approv-Cond

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/21/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed