Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM01255
Parcel: 12418162D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM01255
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/13/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/19/2003 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied From: Daivd Rivera
Senior Planner

For: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

Date: March 24, 2003

Project: T03CM01255
Address: 931 S. Highland Avenue

Kalil Bottling Company - Softdrink Manufacturing


After discussions with the DSD Zoning Administrator, Walter Tellez a determination has been made on the proposed building expansion.

Perishable Goods Manufacturing is not allowed as a principal use in the I-1 Zone but may be processed through a special exception.

LUC 2.7.2.3.E. Industrial Use Group, Sec. 6.3.6
1. Perishable Goods Manufacturing "34", subject to: Sec. 3.5.5.1 and approval through a Type V Administrative Procedure, Sec. 5.4.3.5.

This project must recieve approval through the Type V Administrative Procedure. Contact Glenn Moyer or Aline Torres for information regarding the Special Exception Process.
03/24/2003 DAVID RIVERA HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning comments.
04/01/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Kalil Bottling Co.
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 2 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM01255

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan received on March 25, 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS
1. Depict all lot dimensions and bearings, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5;
2. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
3. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent (DS 2-02.2.1.23);
4. Depict any new, proposed solid waste provision with this expansion. If a new provision is planned, depict the dumpster location and vehicle maneuvering area, fully dimensioned and labeled (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.0);
5. Depict and label new 4' sidewalk and curb access ramps in the 20th Street right of way, with reference to applicable Public Improvement Standard Detail numbers, or to details provided on the plan (DS 3-01.3.3 A.);
6. Depict and label sidewalk scuppers to ensure the sidewalk is traversable and free from flooding during a 10-year frequency flood event (DS 2-08.4.1 E & 3-01.2.8 A);
7. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, Section 3.7.4.
8. The proposed pipe and roof drainage discharge locations (keynotes 35 & 36) must convey runoff in accordance with comment # 5, above. Additionally, existing drainage patterns and discharge locations must be maintained with all new developments. Concentration of roof drainage with discharge at any new location is not an acceptable design without supporting documentation sealed by a state-registered civil engineer, demonstrating no adverse impact will occur to adjacent properties or rights of way. Please revise or address as necessary.
9. No structure may be erected or placed within a sight visibility triangle that may obscure visibility between 30 inches and 6 feet - revise the building footprint as necessary (DS 3-01.5.0). The applicant may wish to apply for a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR), however, relief may or may not be granted.
10. The consultant should note that the proposed finished floor elevation appears to be lower than existing grades and adjacent top of curb elevations indicated on the plan (see comment # 3 above);

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/02/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied Depict any new, proposed solid waste provision with this expansion. If a new provision is planned, depict the dumpster location and vehicle maneuvering area, fully dimensioned and labeled (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.0);
04/02/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Kalil Bottling Co.
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 2 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM01255

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan received on March 25, 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS
1. Depict all lot dimensions and bearings, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5;
2. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
3. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent (DS 2-02.2.1.23);
4. Depict any new, proposed solid waste provision with this expansion. If a new provision is planned, depict the dumpster location and vehicle maneuvering area, fully dimensioned and labeled (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.0);
5. Depict and label new 4' sidewalk and curb access ramps in the 20th Street right of way, with reference to applicable Public Improvement Standard Detail numbers, or to details provided on the plan (DS 3-01.3.3 A.);
6. Depict and label sidewalk scuppers to ensure the sidewalk is traversable and free from flooding during a 10-year frequency flood event (DS 2-08.4.1 E & 3-01.2.8 A);
7. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, Section 3.7.4.
8. The proposed pipe and roof drainage discharge locations (keynotes 35 & 36) must convey runoff in accordance with comment # 5, above. Additionally, existing drainage patterns and discharge locations must be maintained with all new developments. Concentration of roof drainage with discharge at any new location is not an acceptable design without supporting documentation sealed by a state-registered civil engineer, demonstrating no adverse impact will occur to adjacent properties or rights of way. Please revise or address as necessary.
9. No structure may be erected or placed within a sight visibility triangle that may obscure visibility between 30 inches and 6 feet - revise the building footprint as necessary (DS 3-01.5.0). The applicant may wish to apply for a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR), however, relief may or may not be granted.
10. The consultant should note that the proposed finished floor elevation appears to be lower than existing grades and adjacent top of curb elevations indicated on the plan (see comment # 3 above);

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/09/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Based on the proposed expansion the provisions of LUC 3.7 apply to the entire site. LUC 3.7.1.2.B1.b
Submit landscape plans for the entire site that comply with all applicable regulations.
It is understood that variances will be requested. Based on the limited information received and available time it is not possible to distinguish which code sections require variances. It is suggested that the entire section be included in any variance requests. Consult with a B.O.A. planner prior to application for specific requirements. A special Exception approval is also required which may include the need for additional landscape elements. Upon resubmittal of the plans please include decision letters from any related cases and include information on any conditions imposed.
04/09/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/28/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed