Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T03CM01237
Parcel: 13303303C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM01237
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/25/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. Submit complete code review checklist.
2. Fire hydrant required, submit approved COT
Water plan.
04/17/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See site plan review comments dated 4/17/03
04/17/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Troy Williams
4561 W. Annabell Street
Tucson, AZ 85741
(520) 248-0312

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner
DSD

FOR: PATRICIA GEHLEN
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.
PROJECT:
T03CM01237
La Mariposa Restaurant and Club House addition
1485 N. Houghton Road
Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: April 17, 2003

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project is being reviewed as less than a 25% expansion.
DS 2-02
2. The submitted site plan drawing does not show the entire site. Provide a small inset drawing that shows the entire site configuration and add the dimensions and bearings of all lot lines.
DS 2-02.2.1A.5
3. Add the site zoning and the adjacent zoning to the site plan. The site has multiple zoning designations. Some of the zoning does not allow for expansion. UNTIL THE ZONING BOUNDRIES ARE SHOWN IT CANNOT BE DETERMINED IF THIS EXPANSION IS APPROVABLE.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

4. Clarify more specifically the proposed use by providing the development designator to the data and add any restrictions which the use may be subject to per the Land Use Code. Further comments may be necessary once the use/development designator is clarified.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31
5. Provide a Floor Area Ratio calculation. The proposed FAR is calculated as gross floor area divided by site area.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.2

6. Please provide a parking calculation and a handicapped parking calculation. If there are 125 standard vehicle parking spaces, 5 h/c spaces are required, including one van accessible h/c space. Please provide a detail dimensioning typical h/c space, aisles and ramps and indicate the maximum slope of h/c ramps/aisles on the detail drawing.
DS 2-02.2.1.A
ANS/ IBC
7. Provide a bicycle parking calculation and show the location of the existing/proposed bicycle parking spaces, fully dimensioned per DS 2-09, on the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.9
8. The approved site plan submitted shows a smaller building area than is shown to exist on the site plan submitted for review. Expansions are cumulative (all areas of expansion since last approval must be calculated in the percent expansion). Full code compliance may be required. Please clarify and provide copies of approved site plan(s) for other building additions. Provide the cumulative percent expansion of building area in the project information.

9. Provide the dimensions and height of the proposed addition on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.2.A.6


10. Because the configuration of the existing building is shown to be different from that shown on the approved site plan, provide all building dimensions and building setbacks to property lines. The building setback to the north lot line on the approved plan is shown to be 303 feet, but the new setback from the addition to north property line is stated to be only 95.89 feet. Please clarify. There is a lot line running east to west through the pond, where on the approved plan the lot line is farther north of the pond. Has a lot split occurred? If so, provide lot split approval documentation to the Zoning Review Section DS 2-02.2.1.A.7


11. Provide a loading zone calculation to demonstrate compliance with LUC 3.4.5. Add the loading zone, fully dimensioned, including maneuverability area, to the drawing
DS 2-02.2.1.A.14
LUC 3.4.5
12. The entrance drive is shown to be in a different location as compared to that shown on the approved plan. Dimension the width of the PAAL adjacent to the new parking and dimension the ingress-egress points on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11
13. Dimension the eight new angled parking spaces to be provided and provide their angle to show that they meet code.
LUC 3.3.7.2
DS 2-02.2.1.A.8

14. This site is subject to Sec. 2.8.6 Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ). IF there is encroachment into the 100-year floodplain, please refer to DS 2-13 and LUC 2.8.6 for ERZ submittal requirements. The 100-year floodplain must be clearly shown on the plan.
LUC 2.8.6

15. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide connection between the buildings and the adjacent street per DS 2-08.3.1. Please revise the plan to show a dimensioned sidewalk connection to the street from which the site is entered. If no pedestrian circulation is proposed a DSMR application must be submitted and approved. Place the DSMR case number, date of approval, what was approved and conditions of approval on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

16. All lettering must be a minimum of 12 point. Revise all lettering on sheet 1-A which is not the minimum standard for microfilming/archiving.

17. Label existing signage and if any new free-standing outdoor lighting or signage is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 & 25

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
04/18/2003 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Troy M. Williams
Designer
4561 W. Annabell St.
Tucson, Arizona 85741

SUBJECT: 1501 N. Houghton Road
Site plan T03CM01237 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 02

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan.

The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the revised copies of the re-submittal.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
4. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6.
5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
7. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
8. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
9. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
10. Edit pertaining general notes to reflect the project being in the City of Tucson.
11. List the Finished Floor Elevation on the plans.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
04/21/2003 ANY SANITATION REVIEW Passed
04/22/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) The site is subject to the requirements of the Environmental Resource Zone, LUC 2.8.6.
Submit an ERZ application and required plans and reports. DS 2-13.

2) A native plant preservation plan is required. DS 2-15.0
A landscape mitigation plan will be required if the project impacts protected native plants. LUC 3.8
04/22/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied A native plant preservation plan is required. LUC 3.8
Submit a plan or apply for exception DS 2-15.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/01/2003 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
04/22/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed