Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Permit Number - T03CM01041
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Joseph Smith 8727 E. Golf Links Road Tucson, Arizona, 85710 SUBJECT: 9951 E. Millmar Road Floodplain use permit T03OT00947 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 35 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Floodplain use permit The Floodplain use permit (FUP) cannot be approved at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Floodplain Use Permit: 1. It appears that the building is within the 350' erosion hazard setback of the Pantano Wash. Please delineate the top of bank to ensure proper measurement and show the erosion hazard setback. 2. An elevation certificate is submitted to COT engineering division for the Records dept. after construction of the building. 3. Please correct and complete the legal description on the elevation certificate. The survey is calling out that the lot number is 7 and the elevation certificate reads 9. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado, Senior Engineering Associate |
| 06/10/2003 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | Fronts 18" public sewer needs to show connection to exist manhole - needs manhole tap permit |
| 06/11/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | A native plant preservation plan per DS 2-15.0 is required. LUC 3.8 |
| 06/18/2003 | TERRY STEVENS | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T03CM01041 06/19/03 PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 2. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. FOUNDATION PLANS: 1. DIMENSION REQUIRED DISTANCE FROM THE NATURAL GRADE TO BOTTOM OF SILL PLATE AND POSTS. MIN. DISTANCE IS 6". 2. ALL SLABS AND PADS, INCLUDING LANDINGS AT ALL DOORS, SHALL BE SHOWN AND THEIR THICKNESS SPECIFIED. INDICATE THE SLOPE FOR EXTERIOR SLABS, PER R312. 3. ALL FOUNDATION HOLD-DOWNS AND ANCHOR BOLT SPACING FOR BRACED WALL PANELS SHALL BE SPECIFIED AND LOCATED.-------HOLD DOWN IS REQUIRED AT EACH END OF ALL PANELS LESS THAN FOUR FOOT IN LENGTH-------PAHD42 HOLD DOWNS CANNOT BE USED WITH IN 8" OF A CORNER AND ACHIEVE 1800# OF UPLIFT------AN HPAHD22 MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FLOOR PLANS: 1. LOCATE AND IDENTIFY BRACED WALL TYPES, LENGTHS, AND LOCATIONS. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. COMPLETELY DETAIL ALL CONNECTIONS AND CROSS-REFERENCE TO THE FOUNDATION AND FRAMING PLANS: - LEDGERS TO FRAME, FRAME TO LEDGERS--------MISSING AT PORCHES - JOIST TO LEDGER-------MISSING AT PORCHES - HANGER TYPES--------MISSING AT PORCHES - HOLD DOWN LOCATIONS AND TYPE 2. NOTE AND DETAIL TIE STRAPS FRAMING ANCHORS AND JOIST HANGERS BY TYPE, SIZE AND REQUIRED ATTACHMENT TO FRAMING MEMBERS. ELEVATIONS: 1. SIZE ALL ROOF DRAINS OR SCUPPERS ON FLAT-ROOFED AREAS PER R903.4. SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. WOOD SILL PLATES SHALL BE FOUNDATION GRADE REDWOOD OR PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD PER R324. PLUMBING PLANS: 1. THE CITY OF TUCSON HAS NOT ADOPTED THE PLUMBING SECTION OF THE IRC 2OOO. THE CURRENT CODE BEING USED IS THE 1994 UPC WITH THE STATE AMENDMENTS. ALL PLANS MUST MEET AND REFERENCE THIS CODE. 2. WASTE LINE PLAN AS INDICATED DOES NOT MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. LOCATION OF VENTS, SIZE OF HORIZ. WASTE LINES, CLEANOUT LOCATIONS, ETC. ARE WRONG. 3. WATER LINE: PROVIDE TOTAL FIXTURE DEMAND & MAXIMUM DEVELOPED LENGTH---AS PER 1994 UPC ½" COLD WATER LINE TO MASTER BATH INADEQUATE SIZE OF WATER LINE TO HOUSE INADEQUATE MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. NOTE ON PLANS: MECHANICAL SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 12 -16 AND18- 24 2000 IRC. CITY HAS NOT ADOPTED CHAPTER 17 2. GAS APPLIANCES SHALL COMPLY WITH 1994 UPC WITH STATE AMENDMENTS FOR COMBUSTION AIR REQUIREMENTS. DETAIL HOW.----------MISSING FOR GARAGE AREA AND INADEQUATE FOR 2ND MECH. ROOM 3. INDICATE SIZE OF ALL SUPPLY AND RETURN AIR DUCTS. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. NOTE THAT ALL SMOKE DETECTORS MUST BE INTERCONNECTED WITH A POWER SOURCE FROM THE BUILDING WIRING, AND SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH BATTERY BACKUP. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: TERRY STEVENS @ 791-5550 EXT. 112 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2003 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/19/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |