Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM00671
Parcel: 13305054K

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM00671
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/07/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
02/13/2003 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied Disabled parking space ramps must comply wioth ICC/ANSI A117.1 Sections 405 and 406. Revise disabled parking space detail as required.
02/13/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. The proposed lot configuration does not match Pima County Assessors records. The site plan may not be approved until Zoning Review Section approves the new lot configuration. New legal descriptions must be recorded and a copy of the Pima County address certificate for the subject property must be submitted to the Zoning Review Section prior to site plan approval.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.

2. a) Maximum allowed building height is 30 feet. Please revise note on sheet SP-1.
b) Note the proposed building height.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6

3. Revise the site location on the location map. The site is located on the northeast corner of the Camino Seco and Speedway Blvd.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4

4. a) The vehicle parking calculation on sheet SP-1 indicates a total of 70 vehicle parking spaces are provided for this site and a total of 71 are drawn on the site plan. Please revise for consistency.
b) Recorded cross access and parking agreements for the three lots making up the shopping center must be provided.
c) Disabled parking space ramps must comply with ICC/ANSI A117.1 Sections 405 and 406. Revise disabled parking space detail as required.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8

5. a) Provide the bicycle parking space calculation for this site. The class type and number required and provided must be included.
b) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail for both Class I and Class II parking spaces. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4

6. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10

7. a) Add the following general note to sheet SP-1: "One (1) drive-through lane is allowed in the C-1 zone. One (1) drive through lane is proposed for this project".
b) Label and dimension the drive through lane width on the plan. The minimum drive-through lane width leading to the window is 11 feet and must be striped, marked, or otherwise clearly delineated. (D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2.b)
c) Label and dimension the vehicle stacking spaces. A minimum of six (6) spaces , including the space at the window is required. The length of a stacking space is 18 feet. (D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2.c,.d)
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11

8. a) Provide the loading space calculation for this site.
b) Label and dimension the loading space on the plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5

9. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

10. Label and dimension the future curb location along Camino Seco and Speedway Blvd. The future curb is located 12 feet from the future right-of-way line.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21

11. a) Label the zoning classification for the adjacent properties on the plan. Adjacent properties are zoned C-1.
b) Revise the "current zoning" classification noted on sheet SP-1 from B-2 to C-1.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28

12. Add the following general note to SP-1: "Proposed use is General Merchandise Sales "28", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.C"
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31

13. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
03/07/2003 ANY SANITATION REVIEW Denied Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. It appears that a service vehicle will hit a the curb at the NW egress.
03/07/2003 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Archicon, L.C.
Kevin Garey
4041 N. Central #C-100 Phoenix, Arizona, 85012

SUBJECT: 8711 E. Speedway Blvd.
Site plan T03CM00671 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 03

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement.

The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Loren Makus at 791-5550 x1161.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
4. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
5. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
7. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
8. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
9. Where is note #11and 19 used on the site plan?
10. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
11. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
12. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
13. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. It appears that the service vehicle will hit a the curb at the NW egress.
14. A private improvement agreement or permit will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Department of transportation at (520) 791-4249 for permit information.
15. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
16. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed will suffice.
17. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".

Drainage Statement:
1. Please provide 5-year threshold retention per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2,
2. The content and format of the Drainage Statement report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.3.
3. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage Statement report.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul Machado
Senior Engineering Associate,
03/07/2003 ANY FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied Drainage Statement:
1. Please provide 5-year threshold retention per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2,
2. The content and format of the Drainage Statement report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.3.
3. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage Statement report.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
04/07/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Relocate screening elements such as walls and shrub plantings to comply with LUC "3.7.3.4 Sight Visibility Triangle. Any screen higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle." See also DS 2-06.3.8.F which states "Shrubs located in planting areas within vehicular use areas at the intersections of drives will be of a type that grows to no more than thirty (30) inches in height." The location and height restrictions apply to current and future sight visibility triangles. Show the triangles on the landscape plan.

2) Clarify where details 11 and 12 on sheet SP3 apply. All walls are required to meet the provisions of DS 3-01.5.0 Sight Visibility Triangles. Revise as necessary.

3) The loading areas, if located within 100 feet of an adjacent street, are required to be screened completely from adjacent streets with a minimum six-foot high masonry wall. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

4) City Engineer approval is required in order to locate landscaping within the adjacent public rights of way. LUC 3.7.2.9.A
Provide written documentation of any approvals received. This verification is required prior to plan approval.

5) The required street landscape borders provided must contain the minimum number of trees and the minimum percentage of groundcover plantings per LUC 3.7.2.4.A. Plantings located in the adjacent right of way areas are not included in the calculations.

6) Revise the landscape or site plans to include dimensions from the property lines to the screen walls. The minimum distance should be 7'0". LUC 3.7.3.2.C

7) The use of #1 and #2 of the plant material legend is mislabeled on the drawing. Please revise to match numbers with appropriate symbols.
04/07/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Please submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8

See http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/NPPOapp.pdf
for the online version of the form.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/18/2003 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
04/18/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed