Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T03CM00671
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/07/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/12/2003 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet E1.0 1. Clarify purpose of Master Motors in Canopy. Not on mechanical Plan. Certify that they are listed for the location. Provide disconnects. 2. Maintenance outlet inside canopy shall be in WP enclosure when covered per NEC 410-57 (a). 3. Provide disconnects for coolers per NEC 422-30. East edge of building, Ckts A-25,27,29. 4. Same as above for freezer. Sheet E2.0 1. Please provide catalogue cut sheet for Fixture H. Not clear what the wattage is from the fixture schedule. Circuit loading on LP2-6, LP1-6, & LP-8 not possible to evaluate. For example, LP2-6 has 4 fixtures and is loaded to 700 VA, yet LP1-6 has 8 fixtures and is loaded to 1100 VA. 2. Ckt LP4-6 appears overloaded. (20 "A2W")(4)(32) = 2560 > 1600 VA. Also check Ckts 2,4 & 8 on the same panel. 3. Lighting Power Calculation has some figures that appear to be erroneous. Fixture Wattages do not conform to those on the Lighting Fixture Schedule Sheet. If a fixture has more than one bulb, its total wattage would have to be greater than that of one bulb. Sheet E5.1 1. Main Service Entrance on Power Riser Diagram is called out as 240V, but it feeds loads at 208 without transformation. 2. Circuit breakers on Panel MDP (from Sheet E8.1) not entirely consistent with those depicted on the on the Power Riser Diagram. Check RTU-1, RTU-2, and RTU-3. They appear to be protected by 70A CBs on the Diagram, but on Sheet E8.1 are protected by 90A CBs. 3. It appears that RTU-4 is being protected by a 35A CB. Sheet M2 Packaged Rooftop Unit Schedule lists MOCP as 30A. |
| 02/13/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning Review Section may not approve building plans until the site plan is approved by all sections and building plans are approved by structural reviewer. |
| 03/10/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/13/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide site plan showing size and route of water and sewer lines. 2. Provide water and waste fixture counts. 3. Provide calculations of water system per Appendix A, UPC 1994. 4. Horizontal trap arm from the photo equipment floor drain exceeds the length permitted under Section 1002.2, UPC 1994. 5. Confirm that the size of the floor cleanout located at L.9-3 conforms to Section 707.11, UPC 1994. 6. Provide cleanout for pharmacy sink. Reference Section 707.4(1), UPC 1994. |
| 03/13/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Relocate duct smoke detectors to the return ducts of RTU-1, RTU-2, and RTU-3. Reference Section 606.2.1, IMC 2000. |
| 03/13/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/01/2003 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Sheet 25 of calc`s @ the 5' opening(masonry lintel), where does this occur on plans? 2) Provide engineering calc`s for the stairway. 3) On the 2nd sheet of calc`s specify the correct code info. a) 2000 IBC, b) wind load 90mph(3sec gust), c) siesmic. 4) Sheet 4 is very illegible. Provide a more legible sheet. 5) Provide a road map (schematic diagram) to show the location of all the beams,ledgers,lintels,roof members, and columns. 6) All glazing in doors and windows shall be tempered. |
| 04/03/2003 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | Needs WW/1 wc review of photo operation. Needs WW credit evaluation for previous bldg demo if applicable. (Needs to identify what 3" wall box will be used for). |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/18/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |