Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM00507
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. a) Since the storage yard is part of the overall business and it is located on a separate lot, the lots must be combined into one by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. Attached to the yellow site plan card is a copy of the City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. b) Revise all applicable site plan calculations to include the storage yard area. Per D.S. 2-02.2.2.B, when the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Clarify the principal use of the site. If the principal use of the business is general manufacturing then the use must be noted on the site plan as so, including the L.U.C. "subject to" sections associated with General Manufacturing (L.U.C. Sec. 3.5.5.1.B, .F, .G, and .H.). Per L.U.C. Sec. 6.3.4.6, Administrative and Professional Office is defined as a use, which provides administrative, consulting, management, and professional services to businesses and individuals. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 3. Note the existing and proposed building height. If the height of the building has been increased as a result of the addition, the building setback to the street property line must comply with L.U.C. Sec. 3.2.6.4.5.A (The greater of 20 feet or 1 ½ times the building height). D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 4. a) The vehicle parking calculation must be parked under the principal land use only. b) Dimension the wheel stop location. Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2, when wheel stop curbing is used, it is to be located two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking space. c) Per IBC Table 1106.1, two (2) accessible parking spaces are required based on the 29 vehicle parking spaces provided. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 5. Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail including materials for paving, specific type of rack, and five (5) foot maneuverability area. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 6. If a gate is proposed for the entry, add the following general note: "The gate must remain open during business hours." 7. a) The four (4) foot wide sidewalk must be provided to the Julian Avenue right-of-way. b) The pedestrian sidewalk may not be located in front of the loading space. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 8. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 9. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 10. The adjacent property north of the storage yard is located in unincorporated Pima County. Revise the zoning classification to reflect the Pima County zoning classification. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 11. This site lies within the Airport Hazard District. On the site plan, please note the mean sea level elevation of the subject property and the mean sea level elevation of the end of runaway affecting this site. Refer to L.U.C. Section 2.8.5.7 for end of runway M.S.L. elevations and Airport Hazard District regulations. 12. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 02/18/2003 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Refer to Zoning Review comment 4c. |
| 02/19/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/21/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0. |
| 02/21/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A street landscape border is required along the entire street frontage, including the storage yard. LUC 3.7.2.4.A Revise the landscape border calculations, including trees required and percentage of groundcover required as necessary. DS 2-07.2.0 2) Additional canopy trees are required in order to meet the minimum required along Julian Avenue. LUC 3.7.2.4 3) The landscape border is required to be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1 Revise the plans as necessary to provide the required width. 4) A portion of the code required landscape border may be located within the adjacent City right of way only with approval of the City Engineer(TDOT). Provide written documentation of any approvals received. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2 5) A six foot high screen is required between the required landscape border and the storage yard along Julian Avenue. LUC Table 3.7.2-I See LUC 3.7.3.2. for screen location standards. 6) All areas of the site are required to comply with LUC 3.7.2.7 which provides standards for dust control. Revise the plans as necessary. 7) The TEP transformer is not to be located within the required street landscape border. Per LUC 3.7.2-I utility services require screening and landscape borders. 8) All mechanical equipment must be screened from the street per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the plan as necessary. 9) Identify ground surface materials proposed in the "future break area". Keynote 4 on Sheet AS1.0 indicates that the existing asphalt is to be removed. LUC 3.7.2.7 10) Revise the plans to include water harvesting areas per LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Any retention/detention basins must also be landscaped per LUC 3.7.4.3.A & DS 10-01.0. 11) A suitable barrier such as curbing is required to prevent vehicles driving onto unpaved portion of the site. DS 3-05.2.3.C. The vehicular use area is subject to the surfacing requirements of LUC 3.3.7.3. 12) Provide note or detail for the tree planters within the vehicular use area, indicating the minimum inside dimension. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c 13) List plant quantities. DS 2-07.2.0 |
| 03/03/2003 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | See below: SUBJECT: CEMROCK Expansion REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 3 March 2003 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM00507 SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan received on February 22, 2003. Approval of the Site Plan is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: a) Provide a basis of bearing, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5. b) Depict maneuverability area for the loading zone, fully dimensioned (DS) 2-02.2.1.14. c) Depict drainage patterns and finish grades on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.16). d) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17). e) Label and dimension the right-of-way for Julian Avenue (DS 2-02.2.1.19) f) Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations with benchmark based on City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT Field Book and Page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23). g) Depict refuse container size and access thereto, fully dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.32). h) Provide a pavement section detail or note for surfacing requirements for the refuse provision and loading zone maneuverability areas (D.S. 3-05.2.3 A and D.S. 6-01.0). i) Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with Mayor and council policy directive and the City of Tucson's Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B. j) Label existing edge of pavement and increase font size for callout note #'s 23 and 26 (see "blueline" comments on sheet AS1.0). NOTE: A grading plan may be required for this project. Grading permit requirements are based upon earthwork (cut/fill) quantities. Provide a revised site plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Doug Williams Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 03/04/2003 | DOUG WILLIAMS | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | see below: SUBJECT: CEMROCK Expansion REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 3 March 2003 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM00507 SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan received on February 22, 2003. Approval of the Site Plan is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: a) Provide a basis of bearing, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5. b) Depict maneuverability area for the loading zone, fully dimensioned (DS) 2-02.2.1.14. c) Depict drainage patterns and finish grades on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.16). d) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17). e) Label and dimension the right-of-way for Julian Avenue (DS 2-02.2.1.19) f) Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations with benchmark based on City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT Field Book and Page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23). g) Depict refuse container size and access thereto, fully dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.32). h) Provide a pavement section detail or note for surfacing requirements for the refuse provision and loading zone maneuverability areas (D.S. 3-05.2.3 A and D.S. 6-01.0). i) Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with Mayor and council policy directive and the City of Tucson's Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B. j) Label existing edge of pavement and increase font size for callout note #'s 23 and 26 (see "blueline" comments on sheet AS1.0). NOTE: A grading plan may be required for this project. Grading permit requirements are based upon earthwork (cut/fill) quantities. Provide a revised site plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Doug Williams Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 03/04/2003 | DOUG WILLIAMS | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | See below: SUBJECT: CEMROCK Expansion REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 3 March 2003 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM00507 SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan received on February 22, 2003. Approval of the Site Plan is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: a) Provide a basis of bearing, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5. b) Depict maneuverability area for the loading zone, fully dimensioned (DS) 2-02.2.1.14. c) Depict drainage patterns and finish grades on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.16). d) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17). e) Label and dimension the right-of-way for Julian Avenue (DS 2-02.2.1.19) f) Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations with benchmark based on City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT Field Book and Page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23). g) Depict refuse container size and access thereto, fully dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.32). h) Provide a pavement section detail or note for surfacing requirements for the refuse provision and loading zone maneuverability areas (D.S. 3-05.2.3 A and D.S. 6-01.0). i) Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with Mayor and council policy directive and the City of Tucson's Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B. j) Label existing edge of pavement and increase font size for callout note #'s 23 and 26 (see "blueline" comments on sheet AS1.0). NOTE: A grading plan may be required for this project. Grading permit requirements are based upon earthwork (cut/fill) quantities. Provide a revised site plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Doug Williams Engineering Division Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2003 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |