Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM00326
Parcel: 11615190N

Address:
1750 W ANKLAM RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM00326
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/16/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/16/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: ST. Mary's Imaging-Site/Drainage Review
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 18 June 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM00326
T14 S, R13 E, Sec. 10

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has performed a site visit and reviewed the Site Plan and the initial Drainage Report received on 17 June 2003. Reliance upon the previously approved drainage report, referenced in the subject report is acceptable, however, the proposed revisions to the existing detention basin configuration, storage volumes and basin routing at a minimum must incorporate existing outlet weir details, dimensions and elevations. Field verification of this structure, which may be relied upon in the drainage submittal, is strongly recommended to confirm as-constructed elevations and dimensions. Otherwise, drawings proposing construction of these items to match what is being presented in the report will be necessary. Site Plan and Drainage report approvals are not recommended at this time - resubmittal is required. Approval of the Site Plan may not occur prior to Drainage Report and Floodplain Use Permit approval. The following comments are offered:

GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Due to the existing Federally mapped flood hazard area (100-year floodplain) encompassing the site, elevations must be tied to National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) in addition to City Datum (NAVD), for regulatory floodplain development and permitting purposes. Provision of a conversion formula in the report and on the Site Plan may be acceptable with sufficient supporting information, if preferred. Please ensure this datum corresponds with Floodplain Use Permit submittal documents as well;
2. In accordance with Tucson Code, Section 26-11.2 (i), a $150.00 Engineering study review fee is required with the resubmittal of the Floodplain Use Permit Application (DSD activity # T03OT00458). It appears that the comments provided on March 30 have not been addressed. Comments pertaining to this permit application must be fully addressed prior to approval of the Site Plan;
3. A grading permit will be required for this development. Please submit a completed grading permit application with two sets of Grading Plans and a completed grading permit application;
4. Please provide a note on the site plan stating that the site lies within the 100-year floodplain;
5. Include reference to Development Standard 6-01.0 with keynote # 17;

DRAINAGE REPORT:
1. The drainage report must address 5-year threshold retention requirements, in accordance with the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Retention/Detention Manual, Sections 1.4 & 2.2 (Development Standard - DS - 10-01.0);
2. The Drainage Report must contain the seal and signature of the Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer responsible for preparation of the report, in accordance with the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), Section 2.3.1.1 F (Development Standard - DS - 10-02.0);
3. Specify the name, address, and telephone number of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and liability of the drainage improvements, drainageways, detention/retention basin, common areas, etc., described in the report (SMDDFM 2.3.1.2 E - DS 10-02.0);
4. The report must address the size, location, and hydrologic characteristics of the offsite watershed affecting this site, in addition to the two discussed in the report. The current FIRM Panel floodplain delineation and 100-water surface elevations associated with this floodplain must be adequately addressed to ensure the finished floor elevation(s) are compliant with Federal floodplain development requirements. Minimum finished floor elevation requirements for new, and existing substantially improved structures (when the value of a proposed improvement exceeds 50% of the value of the existing structure), must be elevated to a minimum of one (1) foot above the 100-year water surface elevation - including the existing structures' floor elevation, as discussed previously with the Applicant/Architect. The report and plans must clearly demonstrate that the slab elevation(s) meet these requirements (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.3 A 2);
5. Provide either a topographic map at a scale of 1 inch = 200 feet or larger, or a photo-topo showing the (offsite watershed) items listed in section 2.3.1.3 A 3 (a-d) of the SMDDFM (DS 10-02.0);
6. Provide and describe in detail the onsite drainage items listed in Section 2.3.1.3 B 1 & 2 (SMDDFM - DS 10-02.0);
7. Include on a site plan the floodplain related items listed in Section 2.3.1.4 C that apply to this project (DS 10-2.0);
8. Include on the site plan the applicable detention/retention basin items listed in Section 2.3.1.6 A 4, to include basin cross sections and details, fully labeled and dimensioned with basin top, bottom, adjacent spot, berm and 100-year water surface elevations noted, at a minimum (DS 10-02.0);
9. The report must provide revised basin design input, calculations, working and routing tables and all other pertinent basin calculations and results as necessary, in order to address General Comment # 1 above, or present detailed drawings for construction of the basin and weir dimensions that correspond with the report (as approved previously, but apparently not constructed as approved) SMDDFM, Section 2.3.1.6 B1-3 (DS 10-02.0);
10. Include a detailed basin maintenance and checklist schedule including the items listed in Sections 2.3.1.6 C 1 & 2 and 14.3.3 (DS10-02.0);
11. Provide certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to applicable Local, State, and Federal Floodplain Regulations (SMDDFM 2.3.1.7 B);
12. Provide a note stating (a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for the operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and retention/detention facilities at least once a year, and that these report will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner(s) agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining said facilities, should the City find the owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities (SMDDFM, sec. 14.3.3)
13. Provide a copy of the soils report prepared for this project addressing all of the items discussed in the SMDDFM, Section 14.2.6 (DS 10-02.0);

Please address all of the above comments. Resubmittal shall include a revised Site Plan and Drainage Report, and should also include responses to, and resubmittal of, the Floodplain Use Permit Application comments of 30 March 2003 (DSD activity # T03T00458), and a completed grading permit application with accompanying documents.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Douglas Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
06/19/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied See general comment # 5 under Engineering folder.
06/23/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) The addition of retention volume on the parcel to the east will require that the enlarged basin and adjacent streetscape be reviewed for compliance with LUC 3.7.and 3.8.

2) A landscape plan is required for this new work. Plans should verify the existence of a street landscape border and the basin is required to be landscaped per LUC 3.7.4.3 and DS 10-01.0

3) The landscape plans may have to be modified to incorporate any changes due to Native Plant Preservation requirements. See NPPO comments.
06/24/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied 1) A native plant preservation plan or application for exception is required for the adjacent parcel where drainage modifications are proposed. LUC 3.8.3.2.A
06/25/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Metro Permit Express
1010 N. Alvernon Way
Tucson, AZ 85711
(520) 977-7187

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner
Development Services

FOR: PATRICIA GEHLEN
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.
PROJECT:
T03CM00326
Saint Mary's Hospital Imaging Center
1750 W. Anklam Road
Site Plan Review (2nd review)

TRANSMITTAL: June 25, 2003

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Dimension the wheelstops from the front of parking spaces per DS 2-05.2.3.C.2. Wheelstops are to be located two-and-one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of parking spaces. Add the wheelstop curb within the easternmost space in the row of parking spaces to the north of the building.
DS 2-02
2. Revise the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation to state not only the maximum allowed FAR, but also the proposed FAR. In this case the proposed FAR would be calculated as 11,977 square feet GFA ÷ 77,972 site area = 0.15.
DS 3-05.2.3.C
3. Dimension the pedestrian sidewalk connection to Anklam Road. If this new sidewalk is not separated from the access drive by a raised concrete curb, a DSMR application must be submitted and approved. Add the DSMR case number, date of approval, what was approved and conditions of approval to the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12
DS 2-02.2.1.A.38
4. Provide a copy of the parking agreement for the nine parking spaces which are located off-site adjacent to the east of the property.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
06/25/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/30/2003 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/26/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed