Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM00326
Parcel: 11615190N

Address:
1750 W ANKLAM RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T03CM00326
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/24/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied Building cannot be constructed over fire service water mains.
03/03/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning Review Comments dated 3/3/03
03/03/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Metro Permit Express
1010 N. Alvernon Way
Tucson, AZ 85711
(520) 977-7187

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner
Development Services

FOR: PATRICIA GEHLEN
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.
PROJECT:
T03CM00326
Saint Mary's Hospital Imaging Center
1750 W. Anklam Road
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: March 3, 2003

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project is being reviewed as a greater than 25 percent expansion of building area. Full code compliance is required.
DS 2-02

2. Wheelstop curbing is required in all vehicle parking spaces where vehicles may overhang landscaped areas or adjacent sidewalks which are less than 6-1/2 feet in width. Show the wheelstops diimensioned from the front of parking spaces per DS 2-05.2.3.C.2. Wheelstops are to be located two-and-one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of parking spaces.
DS 3-05.2.3.C

3. Add the existing building height, the maximum allowed building height and the proposed building height to the project data.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.6

4. Add to the loading zone calculation a statement that 1 loading zone is required. Dimension the loading zone at 12' × 35' based on LUC 3.4.5.4.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.5
LUC 3.4.5.4

5. Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation to the site plan stating the maximum allowed FAR and the proposed FAR. The FAR is calculated as the gross floor area ÷ site area
DS 2-02.2.2.A.2

6. State the existing use on the site plan (medical service - outpatient).
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

7. With 68 parking spaces provided, 3 handicap accessible spaces are required. Please revise plan.
ANS / IBC

8. Provide the adjacent zoning to the west of the site.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.28

9. Add the development designator to the project data notes. The development designator for the medical service vehicle sales use in the O-3 zone is "30". The development designator for the billboard use is "32". Also add the restrictions which the proposed use is subject to. The medical service - outpatient use in the O-3 zone is subject to LUC 3.5.4.8.B, which prohibits blood donor centers. LUC 2.4.3.2.A.6

10. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide connections between the buildings and the public right of way along each street which the property fronts. Please revise to show continuous pedestrian circulation to Anklam Road along the connecting access drive. DS 2-08.4.1
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

11. Provide a copy of the parking agreement for the nine parking spaces which are located off-site adjacent to the east of the property.

12. Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking detail for the class 2 bicycle parking spaces.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.9

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
03/14/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied A Native Plant Preservation Plan or application for exception is required. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0
03/14/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Show any easements on the landscape plan.
DS 2-07.2.2.E

2) Dimension the Anklam Road street landscape border.
DS 2-07.A

3) Based on the drawing the border does not meet the minimnum requirements for groundcoverage. Revise the plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.4.A

4) The parking lot must be screened from Anlam Road with a 30" high minimum screen. Revise as necessary. LUC 3.7.3, LUC Table 3.7.2-I.
03/20/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: St. Mary's Imaging Center
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 20 March 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM00326

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan and hydrology investigation received on February 22, 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
a) Provide a basis of bearing and bearings for all lot or lease lines, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5;
b) Depict the loading space and maneuverability areas, fully dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.14);
c) Depict, or provide a note addressing the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevations onsite (DS 2-02.2.1.15);
d) The drainage patterns and finish grades provided do not demonstrate adequate drainage onsite. It appears that the proposed curbing near the north property line and southeastern parking area will obstruct existing flow patterns. Provide additional spot elevations, flow arrows with percent slopes and curb opening notes as appropriate, to demonstrate adequate drainage and maintain existing drainage patterns (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
e) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
f) Provide recording docket and page for the 30' gas easement (DS 2-02.2.1.20);
g) Provide datum from which contour elevations were derived, and provide a benchmark based on City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT Field Book and Page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23); please note that development in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain requires that elevation datum be based upon National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) for finished floor and water surface elevations, at a minimum.
h) Depict refuse container size and access thereto, fully dimensioned. (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.4.0);
i) A minimum radius of 18' is required where any parking area access lane (paal) intersects another paal, in accordance with DS 3-01.10, figure 6.
j) Please ensure the Architect's seal is legible for reproducibility purposes, upon resubmittal.
k) Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with Mayor and council policy directive and the City of Tucson's Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B.

HYDROLOGY INVESTIGATION COMMENT:

l) The hydrology investigation submitted does not address this specific project and current floodplain and balanced basin development requirements, as they affect this project. The current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel indicates that a significant portion, if not all of the site lies within the 100-year special flood hazard area (floodplain), thus incurring floodplain development requirements (Tucson Code, Sections 26-4.1, 26-5.2, 26-6.2 and 26-11- City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations).
m) The value of the proposed expansion to the existing structure appears to exceed 50% of its current value, however it is not clear at this time. If so, then this proposed development may constitute a substantial improvement to an existing structure. Submit a detailed assessment of the project cost in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Substantial Improvement requirements. Provide information regarding date of construction of the existing structure and any previous floodplain use permits that may have been issued.
n) Provide a revised site plan and submit a drainage report addressing this proposed expansion, balanced basin flow attenuation and floodplain development requirements, at a minimum. The report submitted may be referenced, if applicable, but the consultant should ensure that appendices and exhibits are included if referenced.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.


Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
03/21/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: St. Mary's Imaging Center
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 20 March 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM00326

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan and hydrology investigation received on February 22, 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
a) Provide a basis of bearing and bearings for all lot or lease lines, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5;
b) Depict the loading space and maneuverability areas, fully dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.14);
c) Depict, or provide a note addressing the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevations onsite (DS 2-02.2.1.15);
d) The drainage patterns and finish grades provided do not demonstrate adequate drainage onsite. It appears that the proposed curbing near the north property line and southeastern parking area will obstruct existing flow patterns. Provide additional spot elevations, flow arrows with percent slopes and curb opening notes as appropriate, to demonstrate adequate drainage and maintain existing drainage patterns (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
e) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
f) Provide recording docket and page for the 30' gas easement (DS 2-02.2.1.20);
g) Provide datum from which contour elevations were derived, and provide a benchmark based on City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT Field Book and Page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23); please note that development in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain requires that elevation datum be based upon National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) for finished floor and water surface elevations, at a minimum.
h) Depict refuse container size and access thereto, fully dimensioned. (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.4.0);
i) A minimum radius of 18' is required where any parking area access lane (paal) intersects another paal, in accordance with DS 3-01.10, figure 6.
j) Please ensure the Architect's seal is legible for reproducibility purposes, upon resubmittal.
k) Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with Mayor and council policy directive and the City of Tucson's Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B.

HYDROLOGY INVESTIGATION COMMENT:

l) The hydrology investigation submitted does not address this specific project and current floodplain and balanced basin development requirements, as they affect this project. The current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel indicates that a significant portion, if not all of the site lies within the 100-year special flood hazard area (floodplain), thus incurring floodplain development requirements (Tucson Code, Sections 26-4.1, 26-5.2, 26-6.2 and 26-11- City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations).
m) The value of the proposed expansion to the existing structure appears to exceed 50% of its current value, however it is not clear at this time. If so, then this proposed development may constitute a substantial improvement to an existing structure. Submit a detailed assessment of the project cost in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Substantial Improvement requirements. Provide information regarding date of construction of the existing structure and any previous floodplain use permits that may have been issued.
n) Provide a revised site plan and submit a drainage report addressing this proposed expansion, balanced basin flow attenuation and floodplain development requirements, at a minimum. The report submitted may be referenced, if applicable, but the consultant should ensure that appendices and exhibits are included if referenced.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.


Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
03/21/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: St. Mary's Imaging Center
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 20 March 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM00326

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan and hydrology investigation received on February 22, 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
a) Provide a basis of bearing and bearings for all lot or lease lines, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5;
b) Depict the loading space and maneuverability areas, fully dimensioned (DS 2-02.2.1.14);
c) Depict, or provide a note addressing the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevations onsite (DS 2-02.2.1.15);
d) The drainage patterns and finish grades provided do not demonstrate adequate drainage onsite. It appears that the proposed curbing near the north property line and southeastern parking area will obstruct existing flow patterns. Provide additional spot elevations, flow arrows with percent slopes and curb opening notes as appropriate, to demonstrate adequate drainage and maintain existing drainage patterns (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
e) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
f) Provide recording docket and page for the 30' gas easement (DS 2-02.2.1.20);
g) Provide datum from which contour elevations were derived, and provide a benchmark based on City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT Field Book and Page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23);
h) Depict refuse container size and access thereto, fully dimensioned. (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.4.0);
i) A minimum radius of 18' is required where any parking area access lane (paal) intersects another paal, in accordance with DS 3-01.10, figure 6.
j) Please ensure the Architect's seal is legible for reproducibility purposes, upon resubmittal.
k) Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with Mayor and council policy directive and the City of Tucson's Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B.

HYDROLOGY INVESTIGATION COMMENT:

l) The hydrology investigation submitted does not address this specific project and current floodplain and balanced basin development requirements, as they affect this project. The current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel indicates that a significant portion, if not all of the site lies within the 100-year special flood hazard area (floodplain), thus incurring floodplain development requirements (Tucson Code, Sections 26-4.1, 26-5.2, 26-6.2 and 26-11- City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations).
m) The value of the proposed expansion to the existing structure appears to exceed 50% of its current value, however it is not clear at this time. If so, then this proposed development may constitute a substantial improvement to an existing structure. Submit a detailed assessment of the project cost in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Substantial Improvement requirements. Provide information regarding date of construction of the existing structure and any previous floodplain use permits that may have been issued.
n) Provide a revised site plan and submit a drainage report addressing this proposed expansion, balanced basin flow attenuation and floodplain development requirements, at a minimum. The report submitted may be referenced, if applicable, but the consultant should ensure that appendices and exhibits are included if referenced.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.


Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/29/2003 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed