Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T03CM00320
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included in the submittal. |
| 06/23/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Water pressure calculations indicate a pressure greater than 80 PSIG. Provide pressure regulator conforming to Section 608.2, UPC 1994. 2. Provide an upper terminal cleanout on the horizontal drainage pipe serving the clothes washer in the typical 2-bedroom plan. Reference Section 707.4, UPC. 3. Show location of the main drain drop from the second floor on the first floor of the typical 2-bedroom plan. 4. Site utility plan does not indicate the location and size of an RPBP assembly. If an RPBP is required by Tucson Water, show location and size. 5. Site utility plan and calculations indicate a ¾" meter is to be installed on a 1" water service line. The size of the meter must be the same as the size of the water service line. Reference Sections 610.2 and A 6.1, UPC 1994. 6. Termination of the excess pressure relief from the water heater over a service sink is not approved location. Reference Section 608.5, UPC 1994. Show routing of the excess pressure relief. 7. The provided roof drainage calculations appear to indicate that the 4x5 downspouts are to be used for both roof drains and overflows. Appendix Section D 1.1 (d), UPC 1994, requires that the overflow be independent of the roof drain. If a scupper is to be used to act as an overflow, provide calculations to show that it is adequately sized. |
| 06/24/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/27/2003 | Martin Haeberle | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify type of sprinkler system to be used. If a NFPA 13 R system is used the exception for fire resistive reductions will not apply. Reference section 903.1.2. Fire partitions between units to be continuous through floor/ceilings, including drop ceilings. References section 708.4 IBC. Provide detail. 2. Plans do not conform to a Type B unit as specified by section 1003 ANSI 117.1. A note is not sufficient. Ground floor unit is required to be accessible, Type B unit. Reference section 1107.5.4 IBC. Revise plans showing conformance with a Type B unit. 3. See comment number 1. Horizontal separation of units is required. Reference section 708.4 IBC. Revise plans. Please include drop ceilings and bearing walls. |
| 07/08/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Structural plans may not be approved until the site plan is approved by all sections. |
| 07/10/2003 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2003 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/10/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |