Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM00320
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2003 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Review comment number six (6). |
| 02/27/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The following comments are based on the land use "Multi-Family Dwelling" in the R-3 zone. Per my telephone conversation with Glenn Bancroft, the use is not proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP). Please remove any references to the RCP and revise all applicable calculations. 2. Note the legal description of the property. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 3. Note the project address. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 4. Sheet AS-1 indicates the proposed building height as 20 feet and sheets A-6, A-7, and A-8 show the building height as 21' 2". Revise the proposed building height on sheet A-2 as required. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 5. Building setbacks to the property lines must be revised to be based on the maximum building height (21' 2"). D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 6. a) Revise the vehicle parking calculation to be based on "Multi-Family Dwelling 0-70 untis" in LUC Sec. 3.3.4. The number of vehicle parking spaces per dwelling unit is based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. Indicate by note the number of bedrooms in each unit. b) One (1) van accessible parking spaces is required. D.S. 2-02.2.1A.8/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 7. The bicycle parking calculation may not be verified for compliance until the correct vehicle parking calculation is provided. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 8. Per D.S. 2-08, a minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk must connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street. The path must be accessible and meet ADA standards. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 9. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free standing signs and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13, .25 10. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 11. Revise the development designator under the code review block on sheet AS-1 to "P". D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 12. Provide the lot coverage calculation. Lot coverage for this site is comprised of the 1st floor building area and vehicular use area divided by the lot size. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 13. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 03/13/2003 | PGILBER1 | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | The refuge container for garbage is required to have a clear approach of fourteen (14) feet by forty (40) feet for the collection vehicle. The maximum back-up distance for the collection vehicle shall be forty (40) feet. The turning radii for the collection vehicle needs to meet the 50' front radii found in the Development Standards, figure 1 in 6-01. Refer to DS 6-01.4.1.C. Please refer to the Engineering comments for additional comments. |
| 03/13/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: 3/12/03 TO: Glenn Bancroft FROM: Patricia Gilbert SUBJECT: Bancroft Apartments T03CM00320 4327 East Bellevue Street RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan The Subject Site Plan is unacceptable for approval. Please address the items below before review can resume. The following comments are offered: D.S. 2-02.2.1 Site Plan 1. 16. Clearly indicate drainage patterns on the site plan. 2. 19. Dimension and label right-of-way. 3. 21. Dimension from street centerline to existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks. 4. 23. Give the Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. 5. The refuge container for garbage is required to have a clear approach of fourteen (14) feet by forty (40) feet for the collection vehicle. The maximum back-up distance for the collection vehicle shall be forty (40) feet. The turning radii for the collection vehicle needs to meet the 50' front radii found in the Development Standards, figure 1 in 6-01. Refer to DS 6-01.4.1.C. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pgilber1@ci.tucson.az.us. Patricia Gilbert Engineering Associate |
| 03/13/2003 | PGILBER1 | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/17/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Five-foot high masonry screen walls are required along the east and west property boundaries where parking areas are located adjacent ot residentially zoned property. LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The existing fence is not sufficient to meet the requirement. Revise the site and landscape plans as necessary. 2) Revise the landscape plan as necessary to reflect any changes required on the site plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A 3) The landscape plan may require revision in order to comply with Native Plant Preservation regulations. LUC 3.8 A native plant preservation plan is required. Plans will not be accepted for review without the required plan. An OK to re-submit is required by the Landscape Section. |
| 03/17/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A native plant preservation plan is required. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0 Plans will not be accepted for review without the required plan. An OK to re-submit is required by the Landscape Section. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/11/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/31/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |