Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM00051
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/10/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Barry Burden Custom Barns Inc. 840 S. Santa Rita Tucson, Arizona 85719 SUBJECT: 2200 N. La Rienda Site plan T02CM00051 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 04 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 2. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 3. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15 (or label). 4. Show the EHSB per COT code 26.7.2. 5. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 7. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 8. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 9. Please provide adjacent property grades for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills. 10. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate, |
| 02/10/2003 | ANY | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show limits of 100 year flood plain. 2. Show EHSB per COT sec 26.7.2. |
| 02/10/2003 | ANY | SANITATION | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/14/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/14/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. The following comments are based on a less than 25% building area expansion. 2. Note the legal description of the property. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 3. Note the height of all existing and proposed structures. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 4. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed free standing signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 5. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 6. Note the zoning classifications for the adjacent properties. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 7. Add the following general note: Existing and proposed use is Commercial Stables "2", subject to: L.U.C. Sec. 3.5.2.1.A.2 and B.2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 8. Provide the lot coverage calculation. Lot coverage is comprised of building area (including barns) and vehicular use area (vehicle parking and driveways) divided by the gross site area. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 |
| 02/21/2003 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/14/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/14/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | A Native Plant Preservation Plan or application for exception is required. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |