Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T03CM00019
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2003 | EROSE1 | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/20/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/20/2003 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 3/21/2003 Building plans may not be reviewed and approved until the site, landscape, and NPPO plans are approved and copies are included in each set of the building plans. |
| 03/24/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2003 | DOUG WILLIAMS | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: El Rio OB/GYN Associates REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 26 March 03 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T03CM00019 and T03BU00024 SUMMARY: Engineering Section has reviewed the drainage report, site plan, and grading plan received on 14 March, 2003. Approval of the Drainage Report, Site Plan, and Grading Plan is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered: DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: a) The percolation test elevations do not coincide with proposed basin bottom elevations - tests should be performed at, and below the proposed basin bottom location. b) A security barrier is required where slopes are steeper than 4:1 H:V and water depths exceed 2', per Section 3.6.2 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Detention/Retention Manual (Development Standard - DS 10-01.0). Depict and label a minimum 42" security barrier in all such areas (see previous drainage report comment h, from 5 Feb. 2003). The consultant should note that a minimum 2' setback from property line is required, adjacent to the retention/detention basin cut slope. This area must be dimensioned and labeled, and must include depiction of a security barrier; c) Depict and label the detention/retention basin 100-year ponding limits on the developed conditions drainage map, per the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management - SMDDFM, Sec.2.3.1.6 A (DS 10-02.0); d) Revise the proposed spot elevations on the developed conditions drainage map for the south side of the basin and at the driveway apron, demonstrating positive drainage exiting the basin and site. The proposed basin inlet, outlet and adjacent elevations north and south of the basin do not correspond with the design discussed in the report; there appears to be ponding in the parking area not discussed in the report. SITE & GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: a) Depict the detention/retention basin 100-year ponding limits, per the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management - SMDDFM, Sec.2.3.1.6 A (DS 10-02.0); b) A security barrier is required where slopes are steeper than 4:1 H:V and water depths exceed 2', per Section 3.6.2 of the Detention/Retention Manual (Dev. Std. 10-01.0). Depict and label a minimum 42" security barrier in all such areas. The consultant should note that a minimum 2' setback from property line is required, adjacent to the retention/detention basin cut slope. This area must be dimensioned and labeled, and should include depiction of the barrier. c) Revise the proposed spot elevations on sheets A1 and A1.1 for the south side of the basin and at the driveway apron, demonstrating positive drainage exiting the basin and site. The proposed basin inlet, outlet and adjacent elevations north and south of the basin do not correspond with the design discussed in the drainage report; there appears to be potential for ponding in the parking area and sheet flow over the Irvington Road public sidewalk as currently proposed, not discussed in the report. d) Please include bases of bearing and elevation descriptions. The actual elevations and bearings must be noted on the plan, with reference to City of Tucson Field Book and Page for basis of elevation - see previous grading comment a, from 5 Feb. 2003 (DS 2-02.2.1.23); Please provide a revised Drainage Report, Site Plan and Grading Plan addressing the above comments. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Douglas Williams Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Section Development Services |
| 04/10/2003 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | Needs to show location/method of connection to public sewer. |
| 04/11/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | See site plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |