Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T03BU02766
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 2/2/2004 Zoning may not review and approve grading plans until a copy of the approved site plan is included in the submittal package |
| 02/03/2004 | Paul Machado | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Robert W. Bollin 29802 Avenida De Las Banderas Rancho Santa Margarita, California, 92688 SUBJECT: 6216 E. 22nd Street Grading Plan T03BU02766 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP. The Grading Plan (GP), Drainage Report (DR) and (SWPPP) Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with the re-submittal. The response letter also included responses from the Site plan comments, however the Site plan was not included in the submittal package for review. Therefore this is a GP review only. 2. The Grading plan and Site plan are two different entities. Each plan requires its own activity number. The plans can be submitted separately or together and bearing the pertinent information. The plans however way you decide to submit them, will require two sets for each activity number. 3. The submittal package also only included 1 copy of the SWPPP. (3) are required. 4. Please direct drainage from the portion of the lot that displays automobiles into the 6" depressed landscaped areas. It has been brought to my attention that minor washing of automobiles may drain into the storm drains and this causes an unsanitary situation. Revise as possible. 5. The GP cannot be approved prior to the approval of the Site plan. 6. A separate permit is required for any walls on the property. 7. Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Please call out benchmark as COT. 8. Because of the amount of data on the GP perhaps a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed. This note is not a requirement, only a suggestion. 9. The Grading plan cannot be approved until the required criteria has been met outlined in Section 13 of the 2000 IBC - Concerning the proposed use of fill greater then 2' in the outer 100' of the property line. Drainage report: 1. The Drainage report is conditionally accepted upon the receipt of a second DR. There was only one DR in the submittal package. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: Signature Requirements 1. All NOIs must be signed and certified as follows: a) For a corporation: By a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Part, a responsible corporate officer m b) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: By a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or c) For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: By either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency is the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g. Regional Administrators of EPA.). 2. The submittal package also only included 1 copy of the SWPPP, (3) are required If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 02/05/2004 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit City Approved and stamped site/landscape plans. The grading plans will be reviewed for compliance with zoning and landscape regulations at that time. LUC 1.1.3 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/09/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |