Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03BU01839
Parcel: 10409001C

Address:
4365 N ORACLE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T03BU01839
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/29/2003 Paul Machado ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Hunter Engineering, Inc.
Tony Buche, P.E
7525 E. Camelback Road
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
SUBJECT: 4365 N. Oracle Road
Grading Plan T03BU01839 (First submittal)
T13S, R13E, Section 23

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and Drainage Report

The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Grading Plan:

1. The Grading Plan will be approved when the Development plan approved. As per my conversation with the representative from RHL Architects, a revision is necessary to the Development Plan. Please resubmit the grading plan when the changes are made to reflect the Development plan. A review of the other comments will be done on this current submittal.
2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal.
3. Remove note no. 2 under the legend regarding additional drywells.
4. Remove Grading and Drainage Note no. 5 since the drainage submittal did no recommend a finished floor elevation.
5. Remove Grading and Drainage Note no. 8 since there is set finished floor in the plain that has to be certified.
6. Add to Grading and Drainage Note no. 10: Contact Permit and Codes @ (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
7. Please revise Grading and Drainage Notes No.s 13, 14 and 17 to reflect the Development Plan basin changes.
8. Please revise General Notes No.s 7 through 11 to reflect the Development Plan basin changes.
9. Remove Retention Basin Inspection and Maintenance note.
10. Provide wheel stops on plan view and on the typical section 7 on sht. C4, see construction note 17 on sht. C2.
11. Remove Construction Note no. 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 27, 29 on sht. C2.
12. Add note to remove existing curb at the new SW enterance.
13. Update typical section 8 on sht. C4 to reflect the Development Plan basin changes.
14. Revise typical section 7 on sht. C4 to reflect the depressing the areas between the curb and property line (on-site) a maximum of 6" for water harvesting, addition of the wheel stops and the inverted section of the P.A.A.L.
15. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. Please revise the SWPPP plan that was submitted, however please note that all comments listed may not be applicable to this project. Please note these for future submittals.


Drainage report:
1. Reviewing the excessive amount of time the basin will take to percolate and the requirements to provide either an engineered basin or to enlarge the basin to percolate within the allotted time are excessive. Considering that the existing conditions were impervious and that no retention was required, it will be allowed to depress the areas between the curb and property line (on-site) a maximum of 6" for water harvesting.
2. Please revise the drainage report to reflect the above decision., if accepted.

Stormwater pollution prevention plan:
1. Stormwater pollution prevention plan comments are forth comming. Projected review completion date: 10-2-03.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
09/29/2003 Paul Machado ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Hunter Engineering, Inc.
Jason Mahkovtz, P.E.
7525 E. Camelback Road
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

SUBJECT: 4365 N. Oracle Road
Grading Plan T03BU01839 (Second submittal)
T13S, R13E, Section 23

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and Drainage Report

The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Grading Plan:

1. The Grading Plan will be approved when the Development plan approved. As per my conversation with the representative from RHL Design Group, a revision is necessary to the Development Plan. Please resubmit the grading plan when the changes are made to reflect the Development plan. A review of the other comments will be done on this current submittal.
2. Please note that the majority of these comments were due to the elimination of the det./ret. basin from the results and rate of the percolation test.
3. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal.
4. Remove note no. 2 under the legend regarding additional drywells.
5. Remove Grading and Drainage Note no. 5 since the drainage submittal did no recommend a finished floor elevation.
6. Remove Grading and Drainage Note no. 8 since there is set finished floor in the plain that has to be certified.
7. Add to Grading and Drainage Note no. 10: Contact Permit and Codes @ (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
8. Please revise Grading and Drainage Notes No.s 13, 14 and 17 to reflect the Development Plan basin changes.
9. Please revise General Notes No.s 7 through 11 to reflect the Development Plan basin changes.
10. Remove Retention Basin Inspection and Maintenance note.
11. Provide wheel stops on plan view and on the typical section 7 on sht. C4, see construction note 17 on sht. C2.
12. Remove Construction Note no. 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 27, 29 on sht. C2.
13. Add note to remove existing curb at the new SW entrance.
14. Update typical section 8 on sht. C4 to reflect the Development Plan basin changes.
15. Revise typical section 7 on sht. C4 to reflect the depressing the areas between the curb and property line (on-site) a maximum of 6" for water harvesting, addition of the wheel stops and the inverted section of the P.A.A.L.
16. Reviewing the excessive amount of time the basin will take to percolate and the requirements to provide either an engineered basin or to enlarge the basin to percolate within the allotted time are a bit costly for the client. Considering that the existing conditions were impervious and that no retention was required per se to begin with, it will be suggested to depress the areas between the curb and property line (on-site) a maximum of 6" for water harvesting. Please call out the water harvesting area with a 6" max. depth.

Drainage report:
1. Reviewing the excessive amount of time the basin will take to percolate and the requirements to provide either an engineered basin or to enlarge the basin to percolate within the allotted time are a bit costly for the client. Considering that the existing conditions were impervious and that no retention was required per se to begin with, it will be suggested to depress the areas between the curb and property line (on-site) a maximum of 6" for water harvesting.
2. Please revise the drainage report to a Drainage Statement to reflect the above decision, if accepted.

Stormwater pollution prevention plan:

Submit Three Packets, each containing:
1. Signed copy of Notice of Intent (NOI); (Part III.F) Each operator is responsible for submitting the original of the NOI to ADEQ. Per previous comment.
2. Signed project manager/owner certification and contractor's certification (if available) (Part IV.J.1)
After review, two packets will be returned to you, one must be retained on the job site, the second is for your records. The third remains with the City for review and inspection purposes.
The Plan Cover sheet should contain:
3. Owner's/Developer's name, address, & phone number, email
4. Engineer's name, address, & phone number, email, please edit the contact person.
5. In the legend for the I.P, BMP no. 73 is called out, please include BMP no. 73 on plans.
6. Remove drywell registration no. designation no. under the Erosion and Sediment Control section.
7. Remove any reference to drywells on the plans.
8. Please use updated version of Development Plan.


SWPPP Requirements:

General Project Information:

1. Provide general location map showing and identifying receiving waters within 1 mile (Part IV.C.2.e), the receiving waters is the Rillito Wash, per previous comment.
2. Include a copy of the AzPDES permit and the NOI on forms provided by ADEQ. (Part IV.F) Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and to the City of Tucson. Per previous comment.
3. Please edit the site area to match the Development plan.
Assessment of Potential Impacts:

1. Identify the name of nearest receiving waters and the a real extent and description of any wetlands that will be disturbed or receive discharges from disturbed areas of the project. (Part IV.C.4). Per previous comment.
BMP Selection:

1. Describe controls to comply with applicable federal, state or local requirements. (Part IV.G) Please edit note no 1. under the Construction Activity Descriptions by removing the reference to Maricopa County.
2. Describe good housekeeping practices to prevent litter, construction debris, and construction chemicals from leaving the site (Part IV.D.3)
3. Include statement that the project is in compliance with all applicable federal State, or local requirements. (Part IV.G)
Erosion Controls:

1. In areas where construction has temporarily or permanently ceased, stabilization measures must be implemented within 14 days. (Part IV.D.4.b) If construction will resume within 14 days, then no stabilization measures are needed. (Part IV.D.4.b.i) Please include statement on plan.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
10/03/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied SUBMIT A COPY OF THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PACKAGE INCLUDING LANDSCAPE AND NPPO PLANS FOR COMPARISON.
10/03/2003 Joseph Linville ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning
10/3/2003
Zoning will review and approve the grading plans once Engineering has approved.
10/06/2003 PAUL MACHADO NPDES REVIEW Denied SEE COMMENTS IN ENGINEERING

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/06/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed