Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T03BU01752
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2003 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Any work which occurs on properties not owned or controlled by the applicant must have the permission of all affected property owners. All work to conform to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. |
| 07/10/2003 | MATT FLICK | NPDES | REVIEW | Approved | Much of the implementation of the SWPPP is not depicted upon the construction drawings or detailed on the SWPPP exhibit. The operator(s) is (are) responsible for implementation of the pollution controls as described in the SWPPP. |
| 07/16/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) This project includes development within an ERZ floodplain (Anklam Wash). Add a note to the improvement plans stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. Once approval is granted, add the file number and approval date to the plan in the general notes. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Per LUC 2.8.6.4.B.1 the "Submittal material will include an Environmental Resource Report as established in Development Standard 2-13.0. This Report presents a study of the resource corridor and documents locations of the resource corridor and critical riparian habitat." If preservation of the critical riparian habitat cannot be accomplished as provided in these regulations, the submittal will include a mitigation plan as required in Sec. 2.8.6.5.D. Applicants proposing a project with encroachment into the one hundred (100) year floodplain are required to submit a mitigation plan in accordance with Sec. 2.8.6.5.D of the LUC and an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Sec. 6.2.5 of the LUC. DS 2-13.2.2.B 2) 1. The Environmental Resource Report must include: a. A table of contents, indicating all information by page or map number. b. A map indicating the boundaries of the proposed development and its relationship to any washes designated on the ERZ maps. c. An aerial photograph no more than two (2) years old, with flight date, north arrow, project site boundaries, and a scale no smaller than one (1) inch equals two hundred (200) feet. d. Any applicable Basin Management Plan, which Recommends that washes remain in a natural state, referenced in the Report. e. A map identifying all significant vegetative communities and plant associations within the resource corridor, including mesquite bosques, cacti with a caliper of four (4) inches or greater, and all saguaros, regardless of size, with the areas of critical riparian habitat delineated. f. A written or mapped assessment detailing the density, diversity, and volume of any of the significant vegetative communities or plant associations. g. A delineation and assessment on an aerial photograph of habitat types noted on the Critical and Sensitive Wildlife Habitat Map. h. A written or mapped assessment of significant densities of wildlife by species. i. A written statement from the regional office of the Arizona Game and Fish Department regarding any endangered plant or animal species on or near the project site. 2. The mitigation report must include: a. A floodplain report. b. The statement of finding as to why one hundred (100) percent preservation of the critical riparian habitat cannot be accomplished. c. A development plan/site plan indicating proposed development; floodplain encroachment locations; techniques used for mitigating impacts to, or preservation of, natural areas; restoration and revegetation of disturbed areas; and general compliance with ERZ standards. d. Detailed drawings as to how encroachment areas will be improved. Provide the required materials with the required application and resubmit with the grading/NPP plans. The application is available online at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/erzapp.pdf Per LUC 2.8.6.4.B.3 "Permits for grubbing, grading, construction, or any other improvements will not be issued until all applicable requirements of Sec. 2.8.6.5 and Sec. 2.8.6.6 are met." Indicate the location of temporary fencing. DS 2-13.2.2.A 3) Identify the Biological Corridor and Biological Corridor Buffer Zones where applicable, as indicated on the approved development plan. Show and describe any easements that are related to these areas. 4) The limits of grassing exceed the limits of development indicated along portions of the 15th fairway. (p. 7, grading plan) 5) Revise all plans to identify the portions of the Ankalam Wash subject to the ERZ regulations. 6) The limits of disturbance must be modified to include areas where the golf course paths are to be constructed and other arears which may be disturbed as a result of construction. Fencing is required to preserve natural areas outside of the limits. DS 2-15.6.0 Revise the NPPO Plan to identify temporary fence locations. |
| 07/18/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |