Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03BU01481
Parcel: 14108522A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T03BU01481
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/27/2003 Paul Machado ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: James R. Watson
Architect
5672 E. Kelso Street Tucson, Arizona 85712
SUBJECT: 6800 E. Century Park Drive
Grading Plan T03BU01481 (First submittal)
T15S, R15E, Section 18

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and Drainage Statement

The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Grading Plan:
1. Grading plan clearly marked "GRADING PLAN". The cover sheet should have a title stating this.
2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with the re-submittal.
3. In note 3 of the general notes, it reads the project may be affected by COT floodplain, please explain.
4. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting"
5. Provide/Add the basin maintenance responsibility per 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2. or state who has the maint. Responsibility.
6. Grading in excess of 5,000 cubic yards shall be performed in accordance with an approved grading plan prepared by a registered civil engineer per Section 9.3 of the 2000 IBC.
7. List administrative address/site address on plans.
8. Remove or correct general note 22. The permit listed is for rough grading only.
9. Show all symbols in the legend. Contour lines
10. Grading in excess of 5,000 cubic yards shall be performed in accordance with an approved grading plan prepared by a registered civil engineer per Section 9.3 of the 2000 IBC.
11. Show cross section with transverse and longitudinal slopes.
12. Show details of all surface materials.
13. Delineate 100-year W.S.E.L., Floodplain and erosion hazard setback.
14. Call out the names of all washes.
15. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line.


16. All proposed fill to conform to Section 13 of the 2000 IBC - Address grade differential of proposed lot grades from the existing buildings adjacent to the graded site - 2' minimum setbacks from top and toe or cut of fill slopes.
17. Drainage patterns with percent slopes (Show patterns within the first 100 feet from the property line).
18. Flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme.


Drainage report:

1. This Drainage statement was reviewed by the first submittal of the Site Plan only. Please include Drainage statement along with the next grading submittal.
2. It appears that a large portion of the parcel is draining to the North. Please address.
3. It appears that the fill being exported is this some type of berm? How will this impact the existing building?
4. Please state in the DS that you have reviewed the data in the report by Jerry Jones & Assoc. and agree to the data. Per previous comment.




If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193, or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
07/03/2003 ANY NPDES REVIEW Approved
07/03/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approv-Cond
07/07/2003 MVALDEZ1 ZONING REVIEW Needs Review

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/09/2003 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/07/2003 LISA LESNY REJECT SHELF Completed