Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T03BU01452
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2003 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Insurance Auto Auction REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 1 July 2003 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03BU01452 SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Grading plan received on 17 June 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered: 1. The approved drainage report incorporates required retention/detention basins on this site, in accordance with balanced basin flow attenuation requirements outlined in the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) and Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Retention/Detention Manual - Development Standards 10-01.0 and 10-02.0. Subsequent revisions to the site plan appear to negate this drainage basin requirement and may not be approved as such. Please revise the grading plan to demonstrate conformance to the drainage report; 2. Provide General Excavation and Grading notes, with reference to the 2000 International Building Code (IBC) for excavation and grading requirements; 3. Depict the limits of grading on Sheets SP1 and SP 2; 4. Please refer to Figure 4 of the drainage report for cross sections A-A through E-E - these cross sections are recommended to be incorporated into the grading plan details to ensure accurate grading and construction dimensions and elevations necessary for the vehicle storage bays and retention/detention basin drainage scheme, as approved in the drainage report; 5. Provide a cross-section for the swale east of the temporary office, fully labeled and dimensioned. Include finished pad grades and the floor elevation for the modular office on the plan, and or within the cross section; 6. Figure 4 (Onsite Drainage Plan) of the drainage report depicts flows exiting the parking area immediately east of the new office building (CP D), yet grades on the plan sheet (SP2), indicate a directing of this flow to the east, adjacent to the temporary office, into the swale. Please ensure the grading plan drainage scheme matches the developed conditions drainage scheme at this, and all other locations; 7. See also NPDES comments. Please address all of the above comments. Resubmittal shall include a revised grading plan, in conformance with approved drainage report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Doug Williams Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 07/03/2003 | DOUG WILLIAMS | NPDES | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the SWPPP to reflect all changes that have or will be occurring to the site, including but not limited to: retention/detention basin and storage bay locations, dimensions etc. Refer to the "Construction SWPPP Checklist" at: www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html Please ensure that all revisions to the Site and Grading plan are also depicted on the SWPPP, upon resubmittal. |
| 07/08/2003 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 7/8/2003 Plans may not be reviewed and approved until Engineering approves. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2003 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/09/2003 | MONICA VALDEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |