Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T03BU00603
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2003 | ANY | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | To: Greg Simmons Architect 6737 E. Camino Principal Tucson, Arizona 85718 SUBJECT: 4326 E. River Road Grading Plan T02BU0 (First submittal) T14S, R14E, Section 00 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Drainage Report Drainage report: 1. A Drainage report is required for parcels greater than one acre per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1. 2. The content and format of the Drainage report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.3.1. 3. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193, or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate |
| 03/13/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Greg Simmons Architect 6737 E. Camino Principal Tucson, Arizona 85718 SUBJECT: 4326 E. River Road Grading Plan T02BU0 (First submittal) T14S, R14E, Section 00 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and Drainage Report The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Grading plan clearly marked "GRADING PLAN". 2. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting" 3. List administrative address/site address on plans. 4. Provide a Location Map (3" = 1 mile) 5. Show all symbols in the legend. 6. List all Cut and Fill quantities in cubic yards. If both are 0 cy, please list. 7. Stamped approved by a Civil Engineer if cut and fill exceeds 5,000 cubic yards. It appears that the cut and fill are under estimated. Please revise. 8. Call out surface paving material. 9. Curb and Gutter elevation include drainage flow with percent slope. 10. Show details of all surface materials. 11. Delineate 100-year W.S.E.L., Floodplain and erosion hazard setback. 12. Call out the names of all washes. 13. Show the 100-year flood peak discharge. 14. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. 15. All proposed fill to conform to Section 13 of the 2000 IBC - Address grade differential of proposed lot grades from the existing buildings adjacent to the graded site - 2' minimum setbacks from top and toe or cut of fill slopes. 16. Drainage patterns with percent slopes (Show patterns within the first 100 feet from the property line). 17. Flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme. 18. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. 19. Show details of all surface and subsurface drainage devices. Drainage report: 1. A Drainage report is required for parcels greater than one acre per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1. 2. The content and format of the Drainage report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.3.1. 3. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193, or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate |
| 03/14/2003 | LOREN MAKUS | NPDES | REVIEW | Denied | Loschiavo Residence 4326 E. River Rd. T03BU00603 Reviewed by: Loren Makus The area to be disturbed during the course of this project appears to be in excess of 1 acre. Develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and submit three copies for review. Also submit three copies of signed Notices of Intent for each operator. The stormwater plan must address all areas disturbed during the course of this project including the access easement and the demolition of any structures in the project area. Details on the requirements of the AzPDES general permit are available at the ADEQ web site: http://www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. |
| 03/17/2003 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 03/17/2003 Grading plans will not be reviewed and approved until Engineering/Floodplain has approved the plans. |
| 03/20/2003 | PATRICIA GILBERT | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | An approved site plan is required prior to grading plan approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |