Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02OT00377
Parcel: 122030340

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02OT00377
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/25/2002 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Rogers Civil Engineering
1765 W. Klamath Drive
Tucson, AZ 85704
(520) 888-8533

FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T02OT00377
2014 N. Belvedere Avenue
Multi-family Development
Site Plan Review (2nd review)
TRANSMITTAL: July 24, 2002

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD

1. Per the Assessor's Map on line via internet it appears that two separate parcels make up the proposed development, the northeast portion of lot 3 which measures at 50 feet by 90 feet and the south 50 feet by 190 feet of lot three (3). The "Residential Property Record Card" provided with this site plan submittal clearly indicates the description of the south 50 feet of lot 3 block 3. If a Parcel Tax Code combo has been processed through the Pima County Assessor's Office please provided a copy of the document. The recorded "lot combo covenant" is also required. The site plan cannot be approved until these two issues have been resolved.

(Previous Comment: Add the legal description of the parcel to be developed. Lot 14 has been split into two separate parcels. The east half does not meet the minimum lot size requirement of 5000 square feet for a single-family dwelling development and the west half of lot 14 would need to meet the development requirements for the existing use. (The west parcel must meet all requirements for the existing development, such as, lot coverage, density, setbacks to the new lot line, etc. Provide the required information on the plan to verify compliance.) When was the lot split and was the lot split approved through the City of Tucson Development Services Department process? Provide the documentation with approval stamps or memo of the split or a 20-year history of lot 14.)
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

2. See related comment one (1). (Previous Comment: A lot combo and a lot combo affidavit will be required. The lot combo form must be filled out at the Assessor's Office. The Lot Combo affidavit is attached to the site plan application or you may request from the Zoning Reviewer (David Rivera). The affidavit must be recorded.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.5

3. A back up spur is required at both ends of a row of parking. A back up spur was provided at one end of the row of parking (east side) but was not provided along the west side. Please revise as required.

The sidewalk along the west side must connect. See redlines for sample.

(Previous Comment: The number of vehicle parking spaces required is based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Indicate the number of bedrooms for each unit. (1 bedroom requires 1.5 spaces each, 2 bedroom units require 2 spaces each, 3 bedroom units require 2.25 each)

The vehicular use area must be designed to meet the following criteria. The minimum width of a two way PAAL is 24 feet. The PAAL area behind the handicap parking space is 15 fifteen. A backup spur is required at both ends of the row of parking. See DS 3-05.2.2.D
DS 2-02.2.1.A.8

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.


C:\planning\dsc\T02COT00377b.doc
08/05/2002 ANY SANITATION REVIEW Denied
08/05/2002 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Lloyd Rogers, PE
Rogers Civil Engineering
SUBJECT: 2020 N. Belvedere Avenue
Site plan T02OT00377 (Second Review)
T14S, R14E, Section 3

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please determine and correct the address.
2. Adjacent property grades must be shown for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills and to determine the grades. (Previous comment)
3. Show existing and if applicable future sight visibility triangles on Belvedere Avenue per D.S. 3-01.5.0. PAAL to local street is: Near side 20'x185', Far side 20'x110', (previous comment).
4. Drainage patterns and finished grades must be shown to determine the WSEL in the PAAL per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16, (previous comment).
5. In excess of 50 cu yds of earthwork on a site, requires a separate grading submittal.
6. A DSMR is required for any construction in the future sight visibility triangle, (previous comment).
7. Show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes in the PAAL. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable, (previous comment)
8. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks, Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S 3-01.4.4, this may be achieved by the use of scuppers, (previous comment).
9. Sidewalks will be required along the frontage of the property.
10. Show existing topography at intervals not exceeding 2' with CI called out and/or spot elevations per D.S. 2-01.2.1.23, (pervious comment).
11. A floodplain use permit is required, please add to general notes: "A floodplain use permit is required prior to the issuance of a wall permit".
12. Add to general notes: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting".
13. Provide an agreement with Solid Waste for curb side service.






Hydrology Report:
1. The Drainage area for this project is called out as 110.4 ac., yet the Q100 is only 112.61 cfs. For this size of an area, the Q100 is extremely low. Please correct.
2. Please indicate (Draw) the hydrologic grade line on the aerial.
3. The Basin factor in the Hydrolic Data Sheet is not correct, please revise.
4. The TSMS nodes on the City of Tucson web site, TDOT, are noted as: At the intersections of Pima Street and Belvedere Ave. the Q100 is 1230 cfs. At the intersection of Grant Road and Belvedere Ave. the Q100 is 1275 cfs. From this data we can assume that the hydrology report is incorrect. Please re-compute.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
08/05/2002 ANY FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied
08/07/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved See site plan for existing preserved plants, also General note 16.
08/07/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied All disturbed areas of the site if not developed or planted must be treated with an appropriate inert groundcover material such as decomposed granite. Revise the landscape plan to provide for ground cover. LUC Sec. 3.7.2.7.

A 10' wide street landscape border is required along Belvedere Avenue. Revise the landscape plan to provide 50% vegetative coverage for the border.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/16/2002 ELAINE ROSE OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed