Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02OT00377
Parcel: 122030340

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02OT00377
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/13/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/22/2002 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Rogers Civil Engineering
1765 W. Klamath Drive
Tucson, AZ 85704
(520) 888-8533

FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner


PROJECT: T02OT00377
2014 N. Belvedere Avenue
Multi-family Development
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: March 22, 2002

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. (Add the legal description of the parcel to be developed.) Lot 14 has been split into two separate parcels. The east half does not meet the minimum lot size requirement of 5000 square feet for a single-family dwelling development and the west half of lot 14 would need to meet the development requirements for the existing use. (The west parcel must meet all requirements for the existing development, such as, lot coverage, density, setbacks to the new lot line, etc. Provide the required information on the plan to verify compliance.) When was the lot split and was the lot split approved through the City of Tucson Development Services Department process? Provide the documentation with approval stamps or memo of the split or a 20-year history of lot 14.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

2. A lot combo and a lot combo affidavit will be required. The lot combo form must be filled out at the Assessor's Office. The Lot Combo affidavit is attached to the site plan application or you may request from the Zoning Reviewer (David Rivera). The affidavit must be recorded.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.5

3. Building setbacks meet requirements based on the building height as indicated in general note 12. Please clarify if the building height as noted is to the top of parapet or gable roof.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.7

4. The number of vehicle parking spaces required is based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Indicate the number of bedrooms for each unit. (1 bedroom requires 1.5 spaces each, 2 bedroom units require 2 spaces each, 3 bedroom units require 2.25 each)

The vehicular use area must be designed to meet the following criteria. The minimum width of a two way PAAL is 24 feet. The PAAL area behind the handicap parking space is 15 fifteen. A backup spur is required at both ends of the row of parking. See DS 3-05.2.2.D
DS 2-02.2.1.A.8

5. Bicycle parking is not required for this development. Four or more units would require that bicycle parking be provided based on the total number of vehicle parking space to be provided. If the bicycle parking facility is to be provided as shown on the plan the facility will be in the area of the required backup spur. Please dimension the facility area to ensure that it meets the requirements of D.S. 2-09. Please relocate as required.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.9

6. If applicable indicate graphically on the plan existing or proposed freestanding signage and lighting layout.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.13
DS 2-02.2.1.A.25

7. See landscape review comments regarding requirements for landscape borders, screening, and NPPO.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.27
DS 2-02.2.1.C

8. Add the zoning classifications of the adjacent parcels. The classifications are R-2 for the surrounding parcels including across Belvedere Avenue.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.28

9. Add the existing and proposed use. The proposed use should be listed as " Residential Use - Multi-family development DD "K" Subject LUC section 3.5.7.1.F".
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

10. Please add a lot coverage calculation. The coverage calculation should include the buildings and vehicular area as defined in the LUC section 3.2.9.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.3

11. Please add the following items as zoning data block.
Add to the parking calculation the number of bedrooms per unit, The allowed and proposed lot coverage,
The allowed and proposed density,
The allowed and proposed building heights.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.4

12. Replace in the title block, the word "Development" with Site.

13. The street names in the location map are not legible. All text including the location map street names must be a minimum of 12 (0.12) point in height. Revise as required.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.
03/28/2002 PHIL SEADER HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Approved
03/28/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Revise the plan to provide a storage area for the refuse containers. The containers must be screened with a 6' masonry wall from the street and from adjacent properties. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

A 10' wide street landscape border is required along Belvedere Avenue. Revise the landscape plan to provide 50% vegetative coverage for the border. The refuse containers may not be stored within the required border.

Revise the site/landscape plans to include water harvesting as indicated in the drainage report. LUC 3.7.4.3.

A minimum 5' high masonry wall is required along the southern and northern property boundaries to screen the vehicular use area(s) from the adjacent residential parcels. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

All disturbed areas of the site if not developed or planted must be treated with an appropriate groundcover material such as decomposed granite. Revise the landscape plan to provide for ground cover. LUC Sec. 3.7.2.7.

Identify all plants as existing, where appropriate. DS 2-07.2.2
03/28/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Photos of the site have been received. Please complete an application for exception, if applicable. A General note should be added to the plans to clarify that existing protected native plants will be preserved. The photos do appear to include plants not identified on the landscape plans, please address removal any existing plants. LUC 3.8
04/08/2002 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Lloyd Rogers, PE Rogers Civil Engineering
SUBJECT: 2014 N. Belvedere Avenue
Site plan T02OT00377 (First Review)
T14S, R14E, Section 3

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Study cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
2. Please provide adjacent property grades for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills.
3. Show existing and if applicable sight visibility triangles on Belvedere Avenue.
4. Please show point of access (driveway apron or curb radii) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
5. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
7. A private improvement agreement may be necessary for work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Department of transportation at (520) 791-4249 for information.
8. A DSMR request is required for any construction in the future sight visibility triangle.
9. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
10. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S 3-01.4.4.
11. Dimension from street monument lines and right-of-way etc. per D.S. 2-02.1.19.
12. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
13. Dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, S/W, utilities etc. per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
14. Show existing topography at intervals not exceeding 2' with CI called out and/or spot elevations per D.S. 2-01.2.1.23.
15. A floodplain use permit is required.
16. A separate permit is required for any work done in the right-of-way, call 791-4942 for additional information.
17. Add note regarding maximizing landscaped areas 6" for water harvesting.
18. Replace the title of the plan Development plan with Site plan.



Drainage Study Report:
1. A Hydrology report is required for parcels affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2, therefore the drainage study report is not acceptable.
2. The content and format of the Hydrology report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.3.
3. Show the project address on the cover of the Hydrology report.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul Machado
Senior Engineering Associate,
04/19/2002 ANY FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied See engineering file for comments.
04/19/2002 ANY SANITATION REVIEW Denied See engineering folder for comments.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/22/2002 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed