Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02OT00114
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/24/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/31/2002 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/19/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/14/2002 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/14/2002 | DOUG WILLIAMS | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See previous "greenlines"/comments from March 2001 regarding the following: 1. Delete the drainage crossing from the Site Plan if not a part of this project/permit. 2. Delineate the 50' Study Area on sheet 2. 3. Include the Alamo Wash designation and corresponding water surface elevations and Erosion Hazard Setback on sheet 2. The Erosion Hazard Setback depicted should be measured from top edge of the nearest channel bank or the 100-year WSEL, whichever is closer to channel centerline (Standards Manual for Drainage Design - Sec. 7.4) 4. The W.A.S.H. Ordinance drainage submittal does not appear to have been submitted under separate cover - said report should be submitted with this package (next submittal) for Code compliance review. 5. Address riprap sizing for the proposed spillways. The Alamo wash velocities may preclude hand-placed riprap (?) 6. Please note: The sheet 3 "Site Plan" should not be titled as such if included with this submittal. The above comments refer to items that must be included on the Site Plan (sheet 2) under this activity number. 7. Omit reference to the "bridge" over the Alamo if not included with drainage submittal. |
| 03/14/2002 | DOUG WILLIAMS | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/14/2002 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/16/2002 | CRAIG GROSS | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | The existing screen wall as shown on Sheet 2 of the site plan within the 14th Street landscape border does not conform to LUC Sec. 3.7.3.2.B and C. Revise the plans as necessary to comply. Show all screening elements on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2 Utility services must be located and screened per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The utility services may not be located within the required 10" street landscape border and must be screened completely from view of the street. The loading areas may not be located within the street landscape border along 14th Street. Revise the plans as necessary to locate any loading areas on the development side of the street borders.LUC Table 3.7.2-I Landscape Plan sheet L-2 appears to indicate a tree in the same areas as a handicap parking space. Revise the plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.3 The permit may not be approved until such time as compliance with the Watercourse Amenities Safety and Habitat provisions of the TCC Chapter 29 is demonstrated, including approval of the WASH Mitigation Plan. Any mitigation required should also be shown on the landscape plans for the site. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/14/2002 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |