Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02OT00046
Parcel: 10604191A

Address:
426 E MOHAVE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02OT00046
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/09/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. A response letter was not included with the resubmittal package as required. In addition, none of the previous comments have been addressed. The following comments are from the 1st review on February 6, 2002.

2. The number of vehicle parking spaces required may not be verified for compliance until the number of bedrooms for each unit, including the existing residence is noted on the site plan. Since this site has changed from single family residence to multi-family residential LUC 3.3.4 required that all units be parked based on the number of bedrooms in each unit.
D.S. 2-02.2.A.8/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4/ L.U.C. 3.3.4

3. a) The number of bicycle parking spaces required may not be verified until the number of vehicle parking spaces required is clarified. See above comment number one (1).
b) Note the type of bicycle parking spaces required and provided under the calculations block on sheet one (1).
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4/ L.U.C. 3.3.4

4. Revise the proposed use noted under general note number one (1) on sheet one (1) to "Multi-family Residential."
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31

5. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
08/19/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Revise the plans to correctly identify the velvet mesquite (prosopis velutina) as shown in the pictures included with the
NPPO exception application.
08/21/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Include notes on the landscape plan in compliance with NPPO regulations. Identify all protected native plants accurately. Provide notes and details for preservation fencing per DS 2-15.5.0 and DS 2-06 Figure 1.
08/29/2002 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: James H. Hockings, A.I.A.
632 E. University Blvd.

SUBJECT: 426 E. Mohave Rd.,
Site plan T02OT00046 (Second Review)
T13S, R13E, Section 25


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan

The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. The grading plan will need to be submitted under separate activity number for a permitting. The flood plain use permit should be paid for and submitted along with the grading plan. ($50.00 application fee + $150 engineering report review).
2. Show existing sight visibility triangles per 2-02.1.10. Why are two site triangles shown?
3. A private improvement agreement may be necessary for work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Department of transportation at (520) 791-4249 for information.
4. Call out PC/COT standard detail nomenclature for the sidewalks and driveway apron.
5. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S 3-01.4.4. Use sidewalk scuppers.
6. Show Drainage patterns, proposed finished floor elevation(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
7. Show existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number.
8. List the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul Machado, Senior Engineering Associate,
08/29/2002 ANY FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied See engineering folder.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/13/2002 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed