Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM05966
Parcel: 116090200

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/FLOOD/WWM

Permit Number - T02CM05966
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/FLOOD/WWM
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/31/2003 DAVE WITT BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T02CM05966

1/31/03 880 N.CANYON MOONLIGHT PL.

PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:

THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2000 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ¼ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED
FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE.

2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS.

3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES.




FLOOR PLANS:

1. PLEASE PROVIDE HANDRAILS AT STEPS AND A DETAIL.

2. APPLIANCES INSTALLED IN GARAGES SHALL BE MOUNTED ON PLATFORMS AT LEAST 18" ABOVE THE
FLOOR, PER M1307.3


STRUCTURAL PLANS:

1. PLEASE JUSTIFY THE 3-2X12 HEADER OVER THE FIRST FLOOR BREAKFAST 6068.

2. PLEASE JUSTIFY THE 5 ¼ X 14 MICROLAM BETWEEN THE BEDROOM AND THE RECREATION ROOM.

3. PLEASE SPECIFY MANUFACTURER AND GRADE OF THE MICROLAMS.

4. PLEASE SPECIFY THE CONNECTION OF BUILTUP MICROLAMS.

5. PROVIDE STAIRWAY CONNECTION DETAILS AND STRINGER SIZES. PRE-FABRICATED METAL STAIR SHALL
HAVE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ATTACHED TO PLANS.



ELEVATIONS:

1. NOTE AND SIZE ALL ROOF DRAINS OR SCUPPERS ON FLAT-ROOFED AREAS PER R903.4.




SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES:

1. SECTION B-B , PLEASE PROVIDE SHT. D2 .

2. PLEASE SPECIFY OR DETAIL THE GUARD RAIL.


PLUMBING PLANS:

1. NOTE AND SPECIFY ALL PIPING MATERIALS.

2. PLBG. ISOMETRIC, THE LAVs. IN THE M/BATH DON'T APPEAR TO BE VENTED .

3. PLBG. ISOMETRIC, THE SHOWER IN THE M/BATH DOESN'T APPEAR TO BE SHOWN.

4. WATER LINE: PROVIDE TOTAL FIXTURE DEMAND & MAXIMUM DEVELOPED LENGTH. THE FIXTURE DEMAND SHOULD BE FROM THE '94 U.P.C. . THE CITY DID NOT ADOPT THE PLUMBING OF THE I.R.C. . THE TOTAL DEVELOPED LENGTH SHOULD INCLUDE THE VERTICAL DIMENSIONS AS WELL AS THE HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS.

5. PLBG. ISOMETRIC , PLEASE SIZE THE DRAINS AND ALL THE VENTS

6. PLBG. ISOMETRIC, SHOW THE VENTS FOR THE TUB AND WATER CLOSET BY THE OFFICE.

7. PLBG. ISOMETRIC, PLEASE SEE U.P.C. 908 FOR PROHIBITION OF WET VENTING BETWEEN FLOORS AND OTHER LIMITS OF WET VENTING.

8. PLEASE RECHECK THE SIZE OF THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM USING THE FIXTURE DENAND FROM THE U.P.C. AND THE DEVELOPED LENGTH INCLUSIVE OF BOTH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LENGTHS.

9. 1 INCH GAS LINE WON'T PROVIDE 370 C.F.H. @ 80 FEET PER U.P.C. TABLE 12-3. PLEASE INCLUDE BOTH THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL DISTANCES AND RECONSIDER THE 80 FEET.


MECHANICAL PLANS:

1. PLEASE SPEC. FURNACE 2 IN THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

2. PLEASE SIZE THE COMBUSTION AND RELIEF VENTS IN THE GARAGE.

3. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF AC 1 AND AC 2 CONDENSERS


ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. ELECTRIC PANEL SCHEDULE, 50 AMP CIRCUITS ARE COMMONLY WIRED WITH #8 WIRE. WILL #4 WIRE FIT IN A 50 AMP BREAKER ?

2. THE LIGHT FIXTURES OVER THE BATH TUB IN THE M/BATH ARE TO BE LISTED FOR USE IN A WET AREA.

3. RECEPTACLES ARE REQUIRED ON THE SOUTH WALL OF THE DINING ROOM.

4. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCONNECTS FOR THE AC 1 AND AC 2 CONDENSERS .

5. PROVIDE AN EXTERIOR OUTLET AT GRADE LEVEL LOCATED AT THE FRONT OF THE
DWELLING, PER E3801.7. THE OUTLET SHALL BE GFI PROTECTED PER E3802.3.


IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER:
DAVE WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 1110


NOTE: AS OF 2-02-01 THE CITY OF TUCSON HAS ADOPTED THE 2000 IRC EXCEPT FOR THE PLUMBING PORTION WHICH IS THE STATE PLUMBING CODE.
02/04/2003 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied Needs to go to DEQ.
02/11/2003 PATRICIA GILBERT NPPO REVIEW Denied 1) A native plant preservation plan is required. LUC 3.8
The project is subject to the Environmental Resource Zone requirements. LUC 2.8.3 Identify the 100 yr. Floodplain limits.

2) The site is subject to the revegetation/slope stabilization requirements of DS 9-04.0
Add the following notes: Vegetation Retention and Revegetation.
Revegetation. All cut or fill slopes which are no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical (3:1) and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields which are not located in parking or driveway areas will be revegetated in compliance with the following requirements.
1. All plants used in revegetation must be the same as the native vegetation on the site or any adjacent site prior to grading or clearing.
2. Revegetation will be accomplished with the following minimum requirements for plants.
a. Desert trees, a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two (2) inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus will be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading. b. Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses will be planted with a density adequate to control erosion.

3) Identify all lines and symbols used on the site plan.
12/30/2002 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Approved
12/31/2002 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/13/2003 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed