Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T02CM05789
Parcel: 13707045D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T02CM05789
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/08/2003 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
09/09/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/11/2003 Robert Sherry PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Resolve the difference between drawings C-3 and P-1.2 with regard to the size of the building water supply line. Third Request.
2. Provide equipment data for the site backflow preventer. Note: the size of the backflow preventer shall comply to the requirements of Section 610.2, UPC 1994. Second request.
3. Provide up and downstream manhole rim elevations, and sewer inverts. Third request.
4. Provide roof drain calculations. Reference Appendix D, UPC.
5. Revise roof drain detail shown on sheet A-22 to comply with D1.1 (d), UPC. Third request.
6. Provide calculations to show the scuppers shown on sheet A-4 are adequately sized and properly located. Third Request.
7. Relocate new floor sink (P-9) in room 111; it appears to be located directly under water heater WH-2. Reference Section 804.1, UPC 1994.
09/23/2003 DOUG LAAKSO BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied .. T02CM05789 .. 251 W IRVINGTON ROAD .. DGL .. 10/7/03 ..BUILDING COMMENTS :
S1. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S1. DRAWING 'G2' NOT SUBMITTED WITH RESUBMITTAL.
S2. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S2. PROVIDE PLAN LOCATIONS, FIRE-RATING DETAILS, LISTINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION REQUIRED, ON DRAWINGS.SEE IBC SEC #3 AND #7.
S3. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S4. PROVIDE COMPLETE ADDRESS ON LIBERTY, AS WELL AS IRVINGTON SIDES OF BUILDING ON CORNER PER PIMA CO. AND PROVIDE OFFICIAL ADDRESS SLIP FROM PIMA CO. .
S4. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S5. REQUIRED ANALYSIS NOT PROVIDE ON DRAWING A0.PROVIDE PER IBC CHAPTER #5.
S5. SEE PRIOR #S6. SHOW REQUIRED FIRE-RATED WALLS ON DRAWINGS.
S6. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S7. PROVIDE REQUIRED FIRE-RATED WALLS, ON DRAWINGS.
S7. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S8. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AS REQUESTED.
S8. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S9. EXPLAIN RESPONSE. CODE RQUIREMENT STILL APPEARS TO APPLY.
S9. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S11. PLEASE ADDRESS COORDINATION OF DRAWINGS.
S10. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S12. PLEASE INDICATE CODE CRITERIA FOR INTEROR FINISHES, PER IBC SEC 8, TABLE 803.4, ON DRAWINGS. A9 vs A12?
S11. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S14. EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WITH EACH ITEM ( ITEM #1 THROUGH #13) IS ACCOMPLISHED AND WHERE IT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
S12. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S15. STATE WHAT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO COMPLY AND WHERE CHANGES ARE SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.
S13. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S16. INDICATE WHERE CALCULATIONS ARE ON DRAWINGS AND WHERE REVISIONS OCCUR TO SHOW COMPLIANCE.
S14. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S17. PROVIDE REVISION TO SOILS REPORT FROM SOILS ENGINEER, ADDRESSING SOILS CAPABILITY, DUE TO PROXIMITY OF RETENTION/DETENTION BASIN TO STRUCTURE.
S15. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #18. WHAT CHANGES ARE REQUIRED IN SOILS REPORT, DRAINAGE REPORT AND AND DESIGN, INCLUDE ON DRAWINGS.
S16. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S19. PROVIDE SOIL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ON DRAWINGS.
S17.SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S20. PROVIDE CEILING SUSPENSION INFORMATION ON DRAWINGS.
S18. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S21.EXPLAIN.
S19. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S24.COORDINATE AND LOCATE MECHANICAL UNITS AND EQUIPMENT AS REQUESTED ON ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.
S20. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S33. WHY IS DEAD LOAD SUBTRACTED FROM UPLIFT TWICE? REFER TO CALCS PAGE #17B :SHOW WELD CAPACITY, SHOW BEAM TO COLUMN CAPACITY , SHOW CAPACITY OF COLUMN TO FOUNDATION , SHOW CAPACITY OF FOUNDATION ,TO RESIST UPLIFT.
S21. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S44. CLARIFY DESIGN FOR STEEL STUD SHEARWALLS TO CONFORM WITH IBC CHAPTER 22 ,DETAIL PER TABLE 2211.1(2).
S22. SEE PRIOR COMMENT #S45. SHOP DRAWINGS AND CALULATIONS REQUIRED.
See prior comments dated 3/26/03. If you have questions regarding these comments, please call Douglas G. Laakso , Structural Plans Examiner at (520) 791- 5550 X 1111.
10/09/2003 Doug Williams ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building plans may not be approved prior to site approval.
10/10/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied 10/10/03
Zoning Review may not approve structural plans until the site plan is approved by all sections and the structural plans have been approved by Building Review.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/20/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/20/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed