Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T02CM05789
Parcel: 13707045D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T02CM05789
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/10/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. Fire sprinklers required per 2000 IBC Sec. 903.2.2 (Tucson Amendments).
2. Show location of required panic hardware on plan.
06/11/2003 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied Site plumbing does not match building plumbing drawings
06/17/2003 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
06/17/2003 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Resolve the difference between drawings C-3 and P-1.2 with regard to the location and size of the building water supply line. Second Request.
2. Resolve the difference between drawings C-3 and P-1.1 with regard to the location of the building sewer. Second Request.
3. Provide location, size, and equipment data for the site backflow preventer. Note: the size of the backflow preventer shall comply to the requirements of Section 610.2, UPC 1994.
4. Provide up and downstream manhole rim elevations, and sewer inverts.
5. Provide roof drain calculations. Reference Appendix D, UPC.
6. Revise roof drain detail shown on sheet A-22 to comply with D1.1 (d), UPC.
7. Provide calculations to show the scuppers shown on sheet A-4 are adequately sized and properly located. Second Request.
8. Termination of the excess pressure relief from the water heater over a service sink (Room 125) is not approved location. Reference Section 608.5, UPC 1994.
9. Show size, route, and termination of excess pressure relief from water heater WH-2. Reference Section 608.5, UPC 1994.
06/26/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building Plans may not be approved prior to Drainage Report/Site Plan approval.
07/07/2003 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
07/07/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied Structural plans may not be approved until the site plan is approved and the structural plans are approved by the Commercial reviewers.
07/10/2003 Martin Haeberle BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Response letter has addressed only eleven of the fifty correction items. Of the items that were addressed in the response letter, numbers 1,5,7,8,& 9 are still not adequately addressed. Please submit a complete response letter and address each corrective action.
Respectfully request that an appointment be made with myself or Mr Laakso prior to resubmittal to help expedite the plan review process.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/18/2003 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/17/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed