Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM05789
Parcel: 13707045D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM05789
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/21/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
01/27/2003 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning Review comment number four (4).
01/27/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. a) Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of two separate parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson lot combination covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. Attached is a copy of the City of Tucson lot combination covenant.
b) Note the legal description.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2

2. Note the building height for all proposed buildings.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6

3. Label and dimension the building setback from the back of future curb along Irvington Road.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7

4. a) Under the vehicle parking calcualtion, please note the grade levels proposed for the school.
b) Motor vehicle parking spaces sized for compact vehicles are allowed only within the Downtown Redevelopment District. (L.U.C. Sec. 3.3.7.2.C.1)
c) The number of standard and handicap vehicle parking spaces required and the MS&R adjustment calculation may not be verified for compliance until the grade levels for the school are noted on the plan and the existing and future right-of-way dimensions are labeled on the plan.
d) Provide a fully dimensioned parking space detail for both handicap and standard parking spaces, together with access thereto. The handicap parking space detail must comply with ANS I 117.1 Sections 406 and 502 curbs, ramps, and parking spaces. The number of disabled parking spaces required must comply with IBC Table 1106.1.
e) Label and dimension the passenger drop-off parking areas and provide the calculation. Refer to L.U.C. Sec. 3.5.3.7.G for requirements.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ L.U.C. 3.3.4

5. a) The number and type of bicycle parking spaces required may not be verified for compliance until the number of vehicle parking spaces is verified.
b) Note the number of bicycle parking spaces required and provided including the class type.
c) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail for each class.
d) Indicate the location of the bicycle parking spaces on the plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ L.U.C. 3.3.4/ D.S. 2-09

6. Dimension all PAAL widths and points of ingress.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11

7. Provide a continuous on-site pedestrian circulation system and pedestrian path which connects to the pedestrian path along the Irvington Road and Liberty Avenue right-of-ways. Refer to D.S. 2-08 for pedestrian circulation requirements. In addition, dimension the width of the pedestrian path.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12

8. Per L.U.C. Sec. 3.4.5 "Civic Land Use Group", one (1) 12 foot by 35 foot loading space is required. Revise the loading space calculation and dimension the loading space on the plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5

9. Label and dimension the existing and future right-of-way and curb locations for Irvington Road and Liberty Avenue.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21

10. If applicable, provide a detail of existing or proposed free-standing signage (including billboards) or outdoor lighting on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

11. Note the zoning classifications for the subject property and adjacent properties. In addition, add the zoning boundaries to the plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28

12. Under the general site calculations block, revise the proposed use as it is listed under LUC Sections 2.4.3.2.B.4 and 2.5.4.2.C.4.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31

13. Revise the gross floor area under the general site calculations block for consistency. There are two different floor areas noted (11,336) and (11,769).
D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3

14. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
02/03/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8

Plan notes A and B on sheet C-2 indicate removal of mesquites and brush. Removal of any protected species requires a native plant preservation plan.
02/04/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 50% vegetative coverage of the area between the proposed screening and the property line along Irvington Road. DS 2-06.3.4.2
50% vegetative coverage is also required for the Liberty Avenue landscape border. Dimension the landscape areas and provide coverage calculations or notes on the landscape plans.

The parking areas must be designed to comply with the provisions LUC 3.7.2.3, which requires canopy trees.

Clarify compliance with LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 which requires appropriate inorganic ground cover in the adjacent right of way area.

Note 2 on sheet L-1 refers to hydroseeding. Provide information on establishment and provide a species list.
DS 9-06.4.2

Screening is required along the south property line including: a 5' wall between the parking area and the adjacent office zone; a 5' screen along the property line and the adjacent office zoned property; and a 6' high wall to screen the loading and refuse storage areas. The proposed fencing does not meet the minimum standard for screening. LUC 3.7.3.7

The loading and refuse storage areas must be screened from Irvington Road with a six-foot high wall, unless located in excess of 100 feet from the property line. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

Revise the landscape to include curbing for the planting areas as indicated on the paving plans. DS 3-05.2.3.C

If the existing 36' drive along Irvington Road is to remain, a barrier will be required to prevent vehicles from parking on or driving on to the landscape buffer. DS 3-05.2.3.C

Note G is shown on Sheet C-2 in the loading area, revise as necessary.
02/28/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Calli Ollin Academy
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 28 Feb 03
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM05879

SUMMARY: Engineering Section has reviewed the drainage report and site plan received on January 17, 2003. Approval of the Drainage Report and Site Plan is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:

The consultant should refer to drainage report content and format requirements outlined in the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) - City of Tucson Development Standard 10-02.0, section 2.3. The submitted report does not address/discuss some of the required components, outlined below:

a) Provide an administrative/site address, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.1 B;
b) Please address Balanced Basin flow reduction requirements in the "Objective/Purpose" portion of the report, per SMDDFM, sections 2.3.1.2 B & C and 2.3.1.6 A;
c) Identify/discuss drainage studies for the parcels adjacent to, or nearby the site that may impact this project, in addition to Liberty Avenue and Irvington Road flows/depths, in accordance with section 2.3.1.2 D of the SMDDFM. Include any of the items applicable listed in Section 2.3.1.4 C;
d) Please specify that the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies will be responsible for the "ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and liability of the drainage improvements", rather than for the "project's improvements" on page six of the report, per sec. 2.3.1.2 E, SMDDFM;
e) Please provide a copy of any drainage-related items included in the CC&R's, referenced for long term maintenance responsibility, or include these items in the report, per SMDDFM, sections 1.5.2 and 14.3;
f) Provide a legible photo-topographic map with delineation of the offsite watershed affecting the parcel, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.3 A 3;
g) Provide and depict a 15' wide vehicular access ramp for the basin, per SMDDFM, section 14.3;
h) Submit a copy of the soils report, and percolation test results in accordance with the recommended procedures of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood Control District, demonstrating sufficient infiltration rates;
i) Revise the 5-year threshold retention calculations to reflect a more accurate existing conditions runoff coefficient (use Cwex per table 3.4 in the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual - Development Standard 10-01.0);
j) Provide revised detention basin, slope protection, and outlet weir (with tie-in) details, fully dimensioned and labeled in the report. The consultant should ensure that balanced basin flow attenuation and a revised 5-year threshold retention volume is addressed and accommodated in the basin design - SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A , B and C, and section V of the Detention/Retention Manual.
Note: the consultant may also wish to refer to section IV of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for design guidelines;
k) The consultant shall ensure revised detention/retention basin design procedures and criteria (routing, working tables, hydrographs, etc.) addressing the above comments, have been met prior to resubmittal;
l) Figure 4 basin sideslopes do not match those depicted in the drainage report. Also, there does not appear to be an opening depicted or addressed for the loading zone and refuse area drainage - please address as necessary.
m) Revise or omit the weir callout note on figure 4, unless this exhibit is included with the report. Revise note B callout locations on the west side of the site (new curbing?);
n) In the report summary, include certification of adherence to applicable local, state, and federal floodplain regulations, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.7 B;
o) Discuss/include a basin security barrier if applicable, per section 3.6.2 of the Det./Ret. Manual (Dev. Std. 10-01.0).
p) Provide scupper conveyance calculations for basin outflow, demonstrating compliance with Development Standards (DS) 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F.

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

Please note any changes resulting from drainage report revisions affecting the Site Plan should be reflected on the plan, as necessary.
a) Depict and label lot dimensions and bearings (DS 2-02.2.1.5).
b) Depict and label existing and future Site Visibility Triangles for the proposed Irvington Road access (DS 2-02.2.1.10 and 3-01.5.0).
c) Depict maneuverability area for the loading zone (D.S. 2-02.2.1.14).
d) Dimension the width of the proposed driveways and parking area access lanes (DS 2-02.2.1.11).
e) Depict and label the 100-year water surface elevation on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.15).
f) Depict drainage patterns and finish grades on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.16).
g) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17).
h) Dimension and label from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines for existing and future (Major Streets and Routes - MS&R) rights of way, (DS 2-02.2.1.21).
i) Depict refuse container maneuverability area, fully dimensioned and labeled. Include a minimum 18' radius at the turnaround (D.S. 2-02.2.1.32, D.S. 3-01.0 - fig. 6, and D.S. 6-01.0).
j) Depict roof drainage direction and associated scuppers for 10-year flow conveyance under sidewalk areas (D.S. 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F2).
k) Provide a detail for the dumpster enclosure, in accordance with DS 6-01.4.0.
l) Indicate whether the Irvington Road sidewalk is existing or proposed. New sidewalks must be six (6) feet wide on all major streets and routes, per Mayor and Council policy.
m) Depict and label new sidewalk on Liberty Avenue, per DS 3-01.3.3 A.



GENERAL COMMENTS:

a) The consultant should note that subsequent comments might be forthcoming, should site/drainage design incorporate changes warranting such, upon resubmittal.
b) A grading plan will be required for this project. Submit a completed a grading permit application with two sets of grading and paving plans. A reseeding bond is required for all sites greater than or equal to one (1) acre. The bond amount will be based upon the area to be graded.
c) A stormwater pollution plan is required on all sites greater than 1 acre, effective March 2003, in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.

Provide a revised drainage report and site plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us


Doug Williams
Sr. Eng. Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
02/28/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied see below:







SUBJECT: Calli Ollin Academy
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 28 Feb 03
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM05789

SUMMARY: Engineering Section has reviewed the drainage report and site plan received on January 17, 2003. Approval of the Drainage Report and Site Plan is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:

The consultant should refer to drainage report content and format requirements outlined in the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) - City of Tucson Development Standard 10-02.0, section 2.3. The submitted report does not address/discuss some of the required components, outlined below:

a) Provide an administrative/site address, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.1 B;
b) Please address Balanced Basin flow reduction requirements in the "Objective/Purpose" portion of the report, per SMDDFM, sections 2.3.1.2 B & C and 2.3.1.6 A;
c) Identify/discuss drainage studies for the parcels adjacent to, or nearby the site that may impact this project, in addition to Liberty Avenue and Irvington Road flows/depths, in accordance with section 2.3.1.2 D of the SMDDFM. Include any of the items applicable listed in Section 2.3.1.4 C;
d) Please specify that the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies will be responsible for the "ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and liability of the drainage improvements", rather than for the "project's improvements" on page six of the report, per sec. 2.3.1.2 E, SMDDFM;
e) Please provide a copy of any drainage-related items included in the CC&R's, referenced for long term maintenance responsibility, or include these items in the report, per SMDDFM, sections 1.5.2 and 14.3;
f) Provide a legible photo-topographic map with delineation of the offsite watershed affecting the parcel, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.3 A 3;
g) Provide and depict a 15' wide vehicular access ramp for the basin, per SMDDFM, section 14.3;
h) Submit a copy of the soils report, and percolation test results in accordance with the recommended procedures of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood Control District, demonstrating sufficient infiltration rates;
i) Revise the 5-year threshold retention calculations to reflect a more accurate existing conditions runoff coefficient (use Cwex per table 3.4 in the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual - Development Standard 10-01.0);
j) Provide revised detention basin, slope protection, and outlet weir (with tie-in) details, fully dimensioned and labeled in the report. The consultant should ensure that balanced basin flow attenuation and a revised 5-year threshold retention volume is addressed and accommodated in the basin design - SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A , B and C, and section V of the Detention/Retention Manual.
Note: the consultant may also wish to refer to section IV of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for design guidelines;
k) The consultant shall ensure revised detention/retention basin design procedures and criteria (routing, working tables, hydrographs, etc.) addressing the above comments, have been met prior to resubmittal;
l) Figure 4 basin sideslopes do not match those depicted in the drainage report. Also, there does not appear to be an opening depicted or addressed for the loading zone and refuse area drainage - please address as necessary.
m) Revise or omit the weir callout note on figure 4, unless this exhibit is included with the report. Revise note B callout locations on the west side of the site (new curbing?);
n) In the report summary, include certification of adherence to applicable local, state, and federal floodplain regulations, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.7 B;
o) Discuss/include a basin security barrier if applicable, per section 3.6.2 of the Det./Ret. Manual (Dev. Std. 10-01.0).
p) Provide scupper conveyance calculations for basin outflow, demonstrating compliance with Development Standards (DS) 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F.

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

Please note any changes resulting from drainage report revisions affecting the Site Plan should be reflected on the plan, as necessary.
a) Depict and label lot dimensions and bearings (DS 2-02.2.1.5).
b) Depict and label existing and future Site Visibility Triangles for the proposed Irvington Road access (DS 2-02.2.1.10 and 3-01.5.0).
c) Depict maneuverability area for the loading zone (D.S. 2-02.2.1.14).
d) Dimension the width of the proposed driveways and parking area access lanes (DS 2-02.2.1.11).
e) Depict and label the 100-year water surface elevation on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.15).
f) Depict drainage patterns and finish grades on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.16).
g) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17).
h) Dimension and label from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines for existing and future (Major Streets and Routes - MS&R) rights of way, (DS 2-02.2.1.21).
i) Depict refuse container maneuverability area, fully dimensioned and labeled. Include a minimum 18' radius at the turnaround (D.S. 2-02.2.1.32, D.S. 3-01.0 - fig. 6, and D.S. 6-01.0).
j) Depict roof drainage direction and associated scuppers for 10-year flow conveyance under sidewalk areas (D.S. 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F2).
k) Provide a detail for the dumpster enclosure, in accordance with DS 6-01.4.0.
l) Indicate whether the Irvington Road sidewalk is existing or proposed. New sidewalks must be six (6) feet wide on all major streets and routes, per Mayor and Council policy.
m) Depict and label new sidewalk on Liberty Avenue, per DS 3-01.3.3 A.



GENERAL COMMENTS:

a) The consultant should note that subsequent comments might be forthcoming, should site/drainage design incorporate changes warranting such, upon resubmittal.
b) A grading plan will be required for this project. Submit a completed a grading permit application with two sets of grading and paving plans. A reseeding bond is required for all sites greater than or equal to one (1) acre. The bond amount will be based upon the area to be graded.
c) A stormwater pollution plan is required on all sites greater than 1 acre, effective March 2003, in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.

Provide a revised drainage report and site plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us


Doug Williams
Sr. Eng. Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
02/28/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Calli Ollin Academy
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 28 Feb 03
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM05879

SUMMARY: Engineering Section has reviewed the drainage report and site plan received on January 17, 2003. Approval of the Drainage Report and Site Plan is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:

The consultant should refer to drainage report content and format requirements outlined in the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) - City of Tucson Development Standard 10-02.0, section 2.3. The submitted report does not address/discuss some of the required components, outlined below:

a) Provide an administrative/site address, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.1 B;
b) Please address Balanced Basin flow reduction requirements in the "Objective/Purpose" portion of the report, per SMDDFM, sections 2.3.1.2 B & C and 2.3.1.6 A;
c) Identify/discuss drainage studies for the parcels adjacent to, or nearby the site that may impact this project, in addition to Liberty Avenue and Irvington Road flows/depths, in accordance with section 2.3.1.2 D of the SMDDFM. Include any of the items applicable listed in Section 2.3.1.4 C;
d) Please specify that the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies will be responsible for the "ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and liability of the drainage improvements", rather than for the "project's improvements" on page six of the report, per sec. 2.3.1.2 E, SMDDFM;
e) Please provide a copy of any drainage-related items included in the CC&R's, referenced for long term maintenance responsibility, or include these items in the report, per SMDDFM, sections 1.5.2 and 14.3;
f) Provide a legible photo-topographic map with delineation of the offsite watershed affecting the parcel, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.3 A 3;
g) Provide and depict a 15' wide vehicular access ramp for the basin, per SMDDFM, section 14.3;
h) Submit a copy of the soils report, and percolation test results in accordance with the recommended procedures of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood Control District, demonstrating sufficient infiltration rates;
i) Revise the 5-year threshold retention calculations to reflect a more accurate existing conditions runoff coefficient (use Cwex per table 3.4 in the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual - Development Standard 10-01.0);
j) Provide revised detention basin, slope protection, and outlet weir (with tie-in) details, fully dimensioned and labeled in the report. The consultant should ensure that balanced basin flow attenuation and a revised 5-year threshold retention volume is addressed and accommodated in the basin design - SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.6 A , B and C, and section V of the Detention/Retention Manual.
Note: the consultant may also wish to refer to section IV of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for design guidelines;
k) The consultant shall ensure revised detention/retention basin design procedures and criteria (routing, working tables, hydrographs, etc.) addressing the above comments, have been met prior to resubmittal;
l) Figure 4 basin sideslopes do not match those depicted in the drainage report. Also, there does not appear to be an opening depicted or addressed for the loading zone and refuse area drainage - please address as necessary.
m) Revise or omit the weir callout note on figure 4, unless this exhibit is included with the report. Revise note B callout locations on the west side of the site (new curbing?);
n) In the report summary, include certification of adherence to applicable local, state, and federal floodplain regulations, per SMDDFM, sec. 2.3.1.7 B;
o) Discuss/include a basin security barrier if applicable, per section 3.6.2 of the Det./Ret. Manual (Dev. Std. 10-01.0).
p) Provide scupper conveyance calculations for basin outflow, demonstrating compliance with Development Standards (DS) 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F.

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

Please note any changes resulting from drainage report revisions affecting the Site Plan should be reflected on the plan, as necessary.
a) Depict and label lot dimensions and bearings (DS 2-02.2.1.5).
b) Depict and label existing and future Site Visibility Triangles for the proposed Irvington Road access (DS 2-02.2.1.10 and 3-01.5.0).
c) Depict maneuverability area for the loading zone (D.S. 2-02.2.1.14).
d) Dimension the width of the proposed driveways and parking area access lanes (DS 2-02.2.1.11).
e) Depict and label the 100-year water surface elevation on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.15).
f) Depict drainage patterns and finish grades on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.16).
g) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17).
h) Dimension and label from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines for existing and future (Major Streets and Routes - MS&R) rights of way, (DS 2-02.2.1.21).
i) Depict refuse container maneuverability area, fully dimensioned and labeled. Include a minimum 18' radius at the turnaround (D.S. 2-02.2.1.32, D.S. 3-01.0 - fig. 6, and D.S. 6-01.0).
j) Depict roof drainage direction and associated scuppers for 10-year flow conveyance under sidewalk areas (D.S. 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F2).
k) Provide a detail for the dumpster enclosure, in accordance with DS 6-01.4.0.
l) Indicate whether the Irvington Road sidewalk is existing or proposed. New sidewalks must be six (6) feet wide on all major streets and routes, per Mayor and Council policy.
m) Depict and label new sidewalk on Liberty Avenue, per DS 3-01.3.3 A.



GENERAL COMMENTS:

a) The consultant should note that subsequent comments might be forthcoming, should site/drainage design incorporate changes warranting such, upon resubmittal.
b) A grading plan will be required for this project. Submit a completed a grading permit application with two sets of grading and paving plans. A reseeding bond is required for all sites greater than or equal to one (1) acre. The bond amount will be based upon the area to be graded.
c) A stormwater pollution plan is required on all sites greater than 1 acre, effective March 2003, in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.

Provide a revised drainage report and site plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us


Doug Williams
Sr. Eng. Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/07/2003 ELAINE ROSE OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed