Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM05758
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Todd Mumma 5515 E. Grant Road #100 Tucson, Az 85712 882-9655 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T02CM05758 Golf Links Sports Complex Entrance Improvements 2400 S. Craycroft Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: January 3, 2003 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. What is called a "site plan" (sheet G2) appears to be a landscape plan. Please provide a site plan with elements and calculations required per DS 2-02. For example, add a legal description, the site zoning and adjacent zoning, lot dimensions, calculations of standard vehicle parking (in this case, because there are no buildings proposed, the parking calc will read: 0 required, 21 provided). Also, provide calculations for handicapped parking (also, see comment 5), bicycle parking (based on the recreation use, bicycle parking is required at 15 percent of the vehicle parking spaces provided, all class 2, however for uses providing less that 50 vehicle spaces, only two class 2 bicycle parking spaces are required), pedestrian circulation and parking, etc. Refer to DS 2-02 for site plan requirements. DS 2-02 LUC 3.3.3.5 LUC 3.3.4 2. Add the development designator to the general notes on the site plan. The development designator for the recreation use in the R-1 zone is "12", in the SR zone it is "6". Also add as a note the restrictions which the proposed use is subject to. The recreation use in the R-1 and SR zones is subject to LUC 3.5.13.2 and 3.5.13.3, which limit the hours of operation and the location and direction of outdoor lighting. LUC 2.2.4.2.E.2 LUC 2.3.4.2.E.1 3. Some of the components shown on the sheets C-2 and C-3 of the paving/grading plan meet site plan requirements, i.e. depicting location of bicycle rack, dimensioning of wheelstop etc. Provide this and all other site plan information on a "site" plan. Revise the detail sheet references on sheet C-2 to indicate that the details are actually found on sheet 3 D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 4. Dimension the depth of the backup spurs to be provided. The minimum requirements for a backup of spur are a 3- foot depth, a 3-foot radius, and a three-foot area between the back of the spur and any wall or obstruction over six inches in height. DS 3-05.2.2.D 5. No van accessible handicapped parking spaces are shown for the proposed parking lots. The minimum required width of a van accessible aisle is 8 feet. Refer to the IBC section 1106 to determine the number of handicapped parking spaces and van accessible spaces are required. Dimension the widths of the standard and handicapped parking spaces, van accessible spaces and access ramps. Provide the maximum slope of the handicapped ramps to be provided (maximum =1:12). ANS/IBC 6. The pedestrian sidewalk connecting to the right-of-way Tucson Blvd must be physically separated from the access drive by raised curbing. DS 2-08.4.1 7. Provide site visibility triangles (SVTs) on the site plan at the intersection of the access drive with Tucson Blvd. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 DS 3-03.2.2.C DS 3-01.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 01/03/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments |
| 01/13/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/14/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/15/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/23/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | A floodplain use permit is required. |
| 12/23/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | A grading plan review is required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/31/2003 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |