Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM05739
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/13/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. a) Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of two separate parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson lot combination covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. Attached is a copy of the City of Tucson lot combination covenant. b) Correct the legal description of the site. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Provide a fully dimensioned detail for the handicap parking space and handicap parking sign. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 3. Per L.U.C. Sec. 3.4.3.2, a loading space may not be located in a travel lane. Revise as required. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 4. Note the proposed easement recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 5. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 01/13/2003 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a fully dimensioned detail for the handicap parking space and sign. |
| 01/14/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the previously approved landscape plan for the site and a revised landscape plan which incorporates proposed changes. DS 2-07.2.0 OK to re-submit required by the Landscape Section. |
| 01/14/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8 |
| 01/14/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 13, 2003 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM05739 PROJECT NAME: beyond bread PROJECT ADDRESS: 3026 N. Campbell PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E. Resubmittal Required: Site Plan The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. A portion of the property is in a FEMA flood hazard area. Please show the limits of the FEMA floodplain on the plan. The relocated dumpster encroaches into the floodplain. Any proposed new encroachment into the floodplain will require a Flood Use Permit. The Flood Use Permit must be obtained prior to Site Plan approval. A Hydrology Report is required for encroachment into the floodplain. Submit the Hydrology Report with the Flood Use Permit application. For Hydrology report format and content see the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDRM, 2.3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15 SMDDFM, 2.2.5 2. Show existing and future sight visibility triangles on the plan for both driveways. The near side length measures 345 ft. The far side is 125 ft. (Based on no raised median on Campbell). The stem side is 20 ft. 3. The loading space can not be located in the PAAL. DS 2-02.2.1.A.14 4. Show drainage patterns on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16 5. Place a note on the plan that all new roof downspouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10 yr. event. DS 2-08.4.1.E 6. Show estimated cut and fill quantities on the plan. Any proposed fill in excess of 50 yards will require a Grading Plan and permit. This includes any proposed cut quantity which is used as fill (in excess of 50 yds). IBC Chapter 36 Section 6.2. |
| 01/14/2003 | JAMES TATE | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering Folder comments. |
| 01/14/2003 | JIM TATE | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering Folder comments. |
| 12/13/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/15/2003 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |