Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T02CM05614
Parcel: 10605012C

Address:
821 W ROGER RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM05614
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved
01/02/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied A revised landscape plan is required for the site. The plan must include all site areas. Although the proposed expansion would not subject the property to a full review for landscape and screening compliance, any modifications to the site are to be documented on the revised landscape plan. Provide a copy of the previously approved landscape plan for reference
in order to allow the review to proceed. DS 2-07.2.0

Provide calculations on the site plan as requested by the Zoning reviewer. DS 2-02.2.2.A.6

Landscape borders must be provided entirely within the property limits, unless expressly approved by the City Engineer. Provide documentation in writing of any approvals received. LUC 3.7.2.4

Landscape borders are to be located based on the MS&R right of way line. Revise the landscape plans to identify the MS&R right of way lines where applicable and dimension any portion of the right of way to be used to meet the landscape border requirements. LUC 3.7.2.4, LUC 2.8.3.5.A

Canopy trees are required for vehicular use areas per LUC 3.7.2.3. Revise the plans to comply with the regulations. This requirement applies to new vehicular use area and the previously approved areas due the relocation of parking spaces.
01/06/2003 JAMES TATE FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Approved
01/06/2003 JIM TATE ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: January 6, 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM05614
PROJECT NAME: Precision Toyota
PROJECT ADDRESS: 871 W. Roger Rd.
PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E.

Resubmittal Required: Site Plan

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

1. Since the same drawings are being used for Site and Grading please title them as such (Site/Grading Plan).

2. The Drainage Report sizes the catch basin as 40 sq.ft. The Site/Grading plan shows 2'X10' (20 sq.ft.) Correct.

3. Place a note on the plan that all roof downspouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10 yr. event. DS 2-08.4.1.E

4. Sidewalks must be provided along all street frontage. It is not clear on the plan whether or not there is existing sidewalk. Provide. DS 3-01.3.3.A
01/06/2003 JIM TATE SANITATION REVIEW Approved
12/09/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/19/2002 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Approved
12/19/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. The following comments are based on a greater than 25% building area expansion (5,520 S.F. proposed; 18,863 S.F. existing) resulting in full code compliance review of the entire site. Please provide the building area, vehicular use area, and lot area expansion calculations on the plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6

2. Lot combination is required for this site. Attached is a copy of the covenant prepared by the City Attorney's Office which must be recorded and a copy submitted to the Zoning Review Section prior to site plan approval. In addition to the covenant, a copy of the Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form must also be signed and approved and a copy submitted to the Zoning Review Section. The tax combination form may be obtained at the Pima County Assessors office.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2

3. Note the project address.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3

4. Demonstrate continuous on-site pedestrian circulation from the existing building to the new building. Refer to2-08 for pedestrian circulation path requirements.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12

5. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free-standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

6. Label and dimension the existing and future ½ right-of-way for Fairview Road. Indicate in the response letter if any site improvements are to be located in the MS&R right-of-way.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19

7. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/08/2003 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed