Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM05502
Parcel: 12002041A

Address:
727 W AJO WY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM05502
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/31/2003 JIM TATE ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: February 6, 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM05502
PROJECT NAME: Pizza Hut
PROJECT ADDRESS: 727 W. Ajo
PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E.

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

This review is based on Zoning's determination that the property is not subject to full code compliance. Should that determination change, additional comments might be forthcoming.

1. Dimension the width of the PAAL and ingress-egress points on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11

2. Show location and dimension widths of sidewalks on the site and on the street frontage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

3. Show and dimension the existing right-of-way for Ajo and 16th. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19

4. Show and dimension the future MS&R right-of-way for Ajo (120 ft.). DS 2-02.2.1.A.19

5. Show the existing and future sight visibility triangles at the egress/ingress to the property and at the corner of 16th and Ajo. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10

6. Show drainage patterns. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16

7. Show street names on the Site Plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18

8. Dimension from street center line to existing curbs and sidewalks. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21
01/31/2003 JAMES TATE FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Approved approved
02/06/2003 JIM TATE SANITATION REVIEW Denied See engineering folder comments.
02/10/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception, previously developed site per 1983 site plan.
02/10/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Development on the site is subject to the regulations in effect when the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2

Research into the site plans approved in 1983 revealed the following notation regarding landscape requirements: "need 5' wide landscape strip. Add'l. 1000 sq. ft. w/in boundary of parking area. All landscaping to be installed prior to issuance
of certificate of occupancy". The strip referred to in the above note is required along the Ajo Way frontage. Revise the site plan to identify the landscape areas and provide dimensions. Provide a plan for new plantings, if applicable.
12/05/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/11/2002 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See zoning review comments
12/11/2002 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Pizza Hut AZ FROM: Peter McLaughlin
5902 E. Pima Senior Planner
Tucson, AZ 85712 D.S.C.
(520) 886-5271

FOR: PATRICIA GEHLEN
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.
PROJECT:
T02CM05502
Remodel, Addition and TI to
Existing Building at
727 W. Ajo Way
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: December 11, 2002

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. This project is being reviewed as less than a 25% expansion.
DS 2-02

2. The submitted site plan does not show the same configuration of parking as is shown on the approved site plan. Dimension the depth and width of the parking spaces along with the angle of the parking along the north property line. Angled parking must meet the criteria listed in Table 3.3.7.I of the Land Use Code. Also, the wheelstops, as shown on the approved plan, must be shown and dimensioned two-and-one-half (2½) feet from front of parking spaces.
DS 3-05.2.3.C.2
LUC 3.3.7.2

3. Correct the site zoning to read "C-2". Add adjacent zoning (C-2 to the east and west, R-2 to the south) to the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

4. Define more specifically the proposed use under Project Information. Commercial Services and Retail uses fall under different use groups in the Land Use Code. In order to determine code compliance the use must be specified. Add the development designator to the data and add any restrictions which the use may be subject to per the Land Use Code. Further comments may be necessary once the use is clarified.
LUC 2.6.1.2.A.10

5. Provide a Floor Area Ratio calculation. The proposed FAR is calculated as gross floor area divided by site area.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.2

6. Please clarify why the required parking is calculated at one (1) vehicle space per 175 square feet of gross floor area. Unless part of a shopping center of less than 10,000 square feet, or a medical service use, most retail uses are parked at 1 per 200 and most commercial service uses are parked at 1 per 250. In order to determine if this site meets the small shopping center criteria, please clarify uses of all tenant spaces. Revise parking calcs if necessary.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.

7. Show the location of the existing bicycle parking spaces, fully dimensioned per DS 2-09, on the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.9

8. The site plan drawing states that the new addition is 300 feet and the project information states that the proposed addition is 1,060. Please clarify and revise one or the other for consistency. Provide the percent expansion and the cumulative percent expansion of building area, since the last approved site plan, in the project information. Expansions are cumulative.

9. Provide the east-west dimension and height of the proposed addition on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.2.A.6

10. Because the configuration of the existing building is slightly different from that shown on the approved site plan, provide all building dimensions and building setbacks to property lines. DS 2-02.2.1.A.7

11. Dimension the width and length of the existing loading zone on the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.14
LUC 3.4.5

12. Dimension the width of the PAAL and ingress-egress points on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11

13. Dimension the four existing parallel parking spaces along the west property line. These spaces do not appear to meet the minimum length requirement of 23 feet.

14. Indicate the slope and dimensions of handicapped ramps, access aisles and h/c parking spaces, and dimension the handicapped accessible route/crosswalk. The length of both h/c access aisles must extend the entire length of the parking spaces per ANS 502.3.2. Please revise.
ANS/IBC

15. Dimension the depth of the backup spur at the southeast corner of the parking lot. DS 3-05.2.2.D

16. Show location and dimension widths of all sidewalks on the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

17. Label existing signage and if any new free-standing outdoor lighting or signage is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 & 25

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/27/2002 ELAINE ROSE OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed