Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T02CM05501
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/10/2004 | Robert Sherry | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise exhaust flow rate of EF-1 to 75 CFM. Reference Section 403.3, IMC 2000. |
| 02/10/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide sizing calculations for domestic water per Section 610.4, UPC 1994. Include all of the information noted in Section 610.7 and determine the available static pressure (after head losses such as the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer) prior to using Table 6-4. Limit the maximum velocity of the water to 8 feet per second. 2. Comment not addressed. Provide the upstream and downstream manhole rim elevations and the finished floor elevations to verify need for a backwater valve. Reference Section 710.1, UPC 1994. |
| 02/24/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. GLOBAL 1. Per Abid Bokhari at Aseaj Engineering, the corrections/revisions to the sealed electrical drawings were not made by the Registrant's office. Nor were the revisions sealed by any Registrant in the State of Arizona. Please see the attached Substantive Policy Statement from the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration. Sheet E-4 1. On Panel 8, the feeder load calculation, according to the figures shown, totals 149.6A on a 100A panel. This contradicts the 64.7A on the most heavily loaded phase. My calculations total 13726 VA for the panel, for an average 57.2A. Please check, clarify/correct as necessary. Circuit 2, which powers 8 receptacles, should have 1440, not 1260 VA. Sheet E-5 1. Suggest that Keynote B applies to panel on Keynote 6, which refers to Panel 7, rated at 200A. Using the #2 to feed the only 200A panel, I suspect, was not the intent. 2. Load calculation for Service #1. My check for total comes to 63,611 VA, not 59,311. This would bring the total to 265.0 A as opposed to 247.1. Not a code issue, but it would be more accurate. |
| 02/27/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Approved by Laith Alshami on 02/27/2004. Please be advised that the southern parking spaces still appear to have a minor conflict with the ingress. This issue shall be addressed on the Grading Plan. |
| 03/05/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning will approve the building plans upon complete approval by the commercial reviewers. |