Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM05317
Parcel: 126130200

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM05317
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/19/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/26/2002 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied The number of required handicap parking spaces may not be verified for compliance until the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided for the entire shopping center is clarified.
11/26/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. The following comments are based on full code compliance review for the new building and vehicle parking only. All calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed.
D.S. 2-02.2.2.B

2. Per Pima Country Assessors Records, the site is comprised of four (4) separate tax codes. If the site is to function as one, lot combination is required. Attached is a copy of the lot combination covenant prepared by the City of Tucson, which must be signed, notarized, recorded, and a copy submitted to the Zoning Review Section prior to site plan approval. In addition to the covenant, a Pima County Assessors Tax Combination Form must be approved and a copy submitted to the Zoning Review Section for City records.
If the site is to function as four separate lots, calculations (F.A.R., vehicle, bicycle, loading) for each lot must be provided and cross access agreements may be required.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2

3. Note the project address.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3

4. Label and dimension the building setback from the future curb along Broadway Blvd. And the edge of travel lane along Venice Avenue. Refer to L.U.C. Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.1, for street perimeter yard width criteria.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7

5. Provide the vehicle parking, bicycle parking, and loading space calculations for the entire shopping center. The calculation must include all existing and proposed building area as required in D.S. 2-02.2.2.B.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14

6. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed free-standing signage or outdoor lighting on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

7. Label and dimension existing and future ½ right-of-way for Broadway Blvd.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19

8. All existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

9. Label and dimension the future curb location along Broadway Blvd.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21

10. Label the zoning classification of the adjacent parcels.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28

11. Since there are a number of different retail uses allowed in the C-2 zone, provide as a note, the proposed principal land use for the building as it is listed under L.U.C. Sec. 2.5.4.2.B.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31

12. Provide the floor area of each building.
D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2

13. A recent site inspection revealed an existing drive-through lane located at the Baskin-Robbins store located west of the proposed project. The last approved site plan attached with the proposed plans does not show this drive-through lane. Provide permit documentation for the drive-through lane. If the drive-through lane has not been permitted, the proposed site plan may not be approved until the drive-through lane is approved by the Zoning Review Section. Refer to D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2 for design criteria.

14. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
12/10/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception, previously developed site.
12/10/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied The new structure is subject to the provisions of the Gateway Overlay Zone. LUC 2.8.4.2

Landscaping is required per LUC 3.7. The landscaping is to be located based on the MS&R right of way line per LUC 3.7.2.4., LUC 2.8.3.2. Revise the plans to clearly show the MS&R right of way line and locate the required landscape border accordingly.

Revise the plans to provide complete screening of the loading area from Venice Avenue and from the residentially zoned property to the south. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, LUC 3.4.4.3

The electrical transformer (utility service) is to be screened and landscaped per LUC table 3.7.2-I.

City Engineer approval is required for any landscaping proposed within the public right of way. Provide written verification of the required approval. LUC 3.7.2.4.A, LUC 3.7.2.9
12/24/2002 JAMES TATE FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied See Engineering Folder Comments.
12/24/2002 JIM TATE SANITATION REVIEW Denied See Engineering Folder comments.
12/26/2002 JIM TATE ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM05317
DATE: December 26, 2002
PROJECT NAME: Midtown Plaza
PROJECT ADDRESS: 4590 E. Broadway
PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E.
RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT
The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

Site Plan

1. Show the existing and future right-of-way for Broadway. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19

2. Show the existing and future sight-visibilty triangles for the corner of Broadway and Venice.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.10

3. Dimension to existing curb or edge of pavement on Venice. Existing or proposed curb requires sidewalk along the entire street frontage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21 and DS 3-01.3.3

4. Show the curb return radius for the Venice egress/ingress. DS 3-01.3.2.C

5. Include a note that all roof downspouts will be routed under the sidewalk. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. DS 2-08.4.1.E

6. The solid waste enclosure is not accessible for the solid waste vehicle. A clear approach 14 feet wide by 40 feet long is required. Inside turning radius is 36 ft and outside is 50 ft. Relocate and show access. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 and DS 6-01.4.1

7. The solid waste enclosure must have bollards between the enclosures side walls and the container. DS 6-01.4.2.C.2

8. Provide a note stating that elevation and drainage information is on Grading Plan sheet 1.

Drainage Report

1. The hydrologic data sheets shows a runoff coefficient of .88. With the data supplied this coefficient should be .94.

2. The basin factor for predominately sheet/street flow in commercial/industrial areas is .048. The hydrologic data sheets show .028.

3. The Hydrologic Data Sheet for OS2 shows a Lc = 1100 ft. The change in length factors total 1400 ft. The mean slope also appears to be incorrect.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/30/2002 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed