Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION
Permit Number - T02CM05298
Review Name: REVISION
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/17/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet 3.2 1. Keynotes 5 & 6 were not on the approved sheet. Please document with proper revision number, date, and cloud. 2. Circuit RILA-33 new on this Sheet, spare on panel schedule. Please document load on panel schedule. 3. Circuit RILB-20 new on this Sheet, spare on panel schedule. Please document load on panel schedule. Sheet 3.3 1. Circuit R2LD-2,4,6,8 Grid B-6 appears to be similar to the other Business Office circuits. However, the Panel Schedule has these loads listed as Break Room equipment. Please clarify. Also note that Circuits 4,6, 10,11,12, 13 & 17 on this panel differ from those on the approved drawings without the appropriate revision cloud. 2. Circuit R2LA-33.35 Grid E-2 has motor added. Please add this load to the panel schedule. 3. Circuits R2LA-32,34,36,38 new on Grid D-3. Please add this load to the panel schedule. 4. Circuits R2LB-20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42 new on Grid E-3. Please add this load to the panel schedule. 5. Circuit R2LA-3, with 6 receptacles, should have 1080 VA, which is greater than 900. Please correct. 6. Circuit R2LA-5, with 7 receptacles, should have 1260 VA, which is greater than 900. Please correct. 7. Circuit R2LB-20 new on Grid F-5. Please add this load to the panel schedule. 8. FC-5 on Circuit RBHA-13,15,17 is FC-4 on panel schedule. Please clarify. Sheet 6.2T3 1. Show that Available fault current will not exceed the rating of the circuit breaker per Note 8. Sheet 7.1 1. DPHA load calculation evidently does not take into account the load X-Ray-1 or X-Ray-2. Load of 685.5A was on original permitted set. Please show load calculations with clear reference to any Code-compliant methods of calculation. 2. EDPH load calculation may not take into account the UPS, or indicate diversity factors, if any. Load appears to be 832.5, not 705.8A. 3. X'FMR load calculation may not take into account Panel RILC, or count RILB at 69A (see Comment 1, Sht 8.1). Load appears to be 239.6, not 171.0A. 4. Please note that a tally of loads for MDR, excluding that for the 225KVA X'FMR, appears to be 848.2, not 970.5A. 5. Could not find C-arm System Cabinet and Power Unit on plans. Therefore could not evaluate Feeders R46 and R47 for the taps rule. (Feeders R44 and R45 on Sheet 6.1T1 are confusing, because there is no R45 on the Feeder Schedule Sheet 7.1). This requirement may be covered in the Power Diagram on Sheet 6.T23, but I would like confirmation. 6. Feeder R48, #1, with ampacity of 130A, is not protected by a 150A CB. 7. Please note whether the KVA ratings on X-RAY #1 and X-RAY #2 are momentary ratings or long-time ratings. 8. Could not find X-RAY #1 and X-RAY #2 on plans. Therefore could not evaluate Feeders R43 and R44 for the taps rule, or the units themselves for proper disconnects. 9. Feeder RC was listed as (4) sets of 500 MCM on the approved drawings. Current version indicated (3) parallel sets, without proper revision cloud. Furthermore, the ampacity of this feeder is 1140A, which is not protected by the 1200A CB. 10. The following feeders had GND conductors indicated on the approved drawings: RC, RE, R2-R5, R7, R12-R18, R22, R23, R26-R34. Such information was eliminated in this version without documentation of revision. 11. Feeders R35-R41 were 1/0 on the approved plan set, on Revision Triangle #1. Now, still on Revision Triangle #1, such feeders have been altered to #2. Furthermore, such conductors with 115A ampacity, are not protected by the 150A CB. Sheet 8.1 1. It appears that Panel RILB has total load of 24,770 VA, or 69A. Please clarify or correct. 2. It appears that Panel EILA has total load of 24,261 VA or 67A. Please clarify or correct. 3. Panel EILA Ckt-32,34 had no load on approved plans. Please make the proper revision documentation. 4. Loads for Panel R2LD Ckts 4,6,10,11,12,13,& 16 are less than indicated on approved plans. No revision documentation. Please clarify/correct/rework load calculations as necessary. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/17/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/17/2004 | LISA LESNY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |