Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T02CM05298
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2003 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet RE-1.0 1. Submit lighting fixture cut sheets. Next review will check for full cutoff for parking lot fixtures. Sheet RE-1.1 1. Lighting Circuits fed by Panel CBHA. There is no such Panel. The only panel with exterior lighting appears to be RBHA. However, parking lot lights on this panel are called on Ckts 2,4,6, whereas parking lot lights on this Sheet RE-1.1 are CBHA 1,3,5,7,9,11. 2. Same as above for signage on CBHA. 3. Plan does not show what is being powered by RBHA-14. 4. Specify depth of conduit fill for exterior lighting. 5. Specify pole heights. If over 20' they will have to be submitted for structural review. Sheet RE-2.1 1. Indicate panel/circuit for emergency lights. Sheet RE-2.2 1. Circuit beginning at grid Point A/3. Can not find panel/circuit. Is it E2HA Ckt 3? 2. Near Grid Point B/4 there is an indication RILB-31,33. On the panel schedule these are spares. Clarify. 3. Circuitry for lighting in MRI Exam Room by Grid Point A/6 does not have panel designation. 4. Near Grid Point B/5 there is an indication RILB-27,29. On the panel schedule these are courtyard lighting and spare, not exam room lighting. Clarify. 5. Submit IECC calculations. 6. This is an incomplete review for this sheet. Please check all branch circuits for panel, circuit, and loading, and re-submit. Sheet RE-3.1 1. Size the fuses in the elevator disconnects. 2. Provide specifications for elevator conductors and conduit. 620-11, 12. 620-21. 3. A separate branch circuit shall supply the machine room lighting and receptacle per NEC 620-23 (a). Coordinate with Sheet RE-2.1. 4. A separate branch circuit shall supply the hoist pit lighting and receptacle per NEC 620-24 (a). Coordinate with Sheet RE-2.1. 5. Please confirm that elevator controllers are within sight of the disconnects. In (Elev Equipment Rm 102?) 6. Receptacles serving elevator pits and machine rooms shall be GFCI. 620-85. According to your legend these are on an emergency circuit, but are not GFCI protected. Please clarify. Sheet RE-3.2 1. This is not a code issue, but it may be a good idea to bond together the equipment grounding busses of Panels RILB and EILA. Sheet RE-5.1 1. For FC-1 and FC-2, and all other motor loads where fuse sizes on disconnects have not been specified, add the note: "All HVAC equipment shall be fused per manufacturer's specifications." 2. Clarify equipment fed by Feeder R27 3. Identify branch circuits for WFC-1 and WFC-2. 4. Size the fuses in the fused disconnects. Sheet RE-5.2 1. Size the fuses in the fused disconnects for H-1 and H-2. Sheet RE-5.3 1. Size the fuses for in the fused disconnects P-1 and P-2. Sheet RE-5.4 1. AC-2 is listed on Sheet M5.1 as "MROPD 110." Confirmed with Adams & Associates that this stands for "Manufacturer's Recommended Overcurrent Protection Device." Was it the intent to protect at 150 (in fused disconnect and on Panel RRHA-2,4,6. 2. Same as above regarding AC-3. MROPD 175 < 225. 3. Same as above regarding AC-1. MROPD 110 < 150. 4. Amps and fuses on CH-1 and CH-2 do not match these parameters on Mechanical Schedule sheet. Please clarify. 5. CU-1 and CU-2 should be protected at 15A, not 20A. 440-22 (a) 6. EF-1 should be protected at 25A, not 30. 7. Clarify feeder R32 for AC-1, and circuit for this device. RE-6.1 1. Pet Scan Rm 268 does not appear to have a disconnect per NEC 517-72. Please correct/clarify. 2. Mammogram areas on the east side of the building, same as above. Coordinate with Sheet RE-3.2. RE-6.2 1. Several of the notes under the heading "Installing Power Lines" have the word "should". In every case where the instruction pertains to Code/Life Safety issues, change the word "should" to the work "shall". 2. Same as #1 above for "Lighting Guidelines." 3. Regarding to Electrical Notes 5,6, &7, please clarify that receptacles in all patient care areas are to be subject to the same redundant grounding requirements as the equipment, per NEC 517-13. 4. Same as #3 above for all other patient care areas not covered on the sheet. Redundant grounding of equipment and receptacles in patient care areas per NEC 517-3. 5. Without UPS specifications, it is not possible to determine whether this is a derived system, or if output power conductor is protected. Please provide. Sheet RE-7.1 1. Provide fault current at ATS, AC-1 and chillers, and bracing information for these devices. 2. Can not parallel #2 conductors. CT Scan fed by DPHA and EDPH. 3. Feeder RC is undersized. Not protected by 1200A CB. 4. Clarify whether ATS is 3-pole or 4-pole. Evaluate generator for derived system. Coordinate with Page 16210-3 in the specifications, Section 2.7 B. Provide these parameters on the plans (voltage, phase, number of poses, and short circuit withstand rating as well as just the ampere rating. 5. Check distance from 75 KVA X'FMR to EBLA. It appears that the 25' limit may be exceeded. NEC 240-21 (b) (3) 6. Provide for generator derating for ambient and elevation. 7. There are no P-3 or P-4 on mechanical equipment schedules. PLS clarify. 8. AC-1 MCA is not as indicated on mechanical schedule. PLS clarify. 9. Disconnects to motors are fused, not unfused. Sheet RE-8.2 1. On Panel R2LC there are loads of 5980, 4800, and 6675 VA on spare CBs, A, B, and C Phases respectively. Clarify/recompute load calcs as appropriate. Sheet RE-8.3 2. On Panel EILA CKT 20 there is no load indicated for the "C-Arm Receptacles". |
| 01/10/2003 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 1/10/2003 see comments under T02CM05297 |
| 01/14/2003 | JAMES TATE | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | A copy of the stamped approved Development Plan must be included with the submittal. |
| 01/14/2003 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | Needs to build private sewer / Needs joint use agreement. |
| 11/18/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | MEDICAL GAS SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 2000 IFC SECTION 3006. |
| 12/24/2002 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Beams W 8x10 and angle 4x4x5/16 are not on the beam schedule, but are on the calculations. Where do they apply on plans? 2) The bottom of the BEAM-COMPOSITE schedule is unclear, also the line B 16 is unclear. 3) The details at the bottom of the concrete column schedule are unclear. Clarify! 4) Where are structural members RJ8, RJ7,and RJ9 shown on calcs. 5) Show on plans the FLOOR FRAMING ABOVE BASEMENT plan. 6) Are buildings 1 and 2 identicle? 7) Show on plans the location of the moment resisting frames as called out on calc`s. 2/12/03 1) Specify the spacing of the BC-1 and BC-2 beams and joists. 2) Structural wood shall be fire retardant and pressure treated. 3) Provide a detail showing the connection of the drag strut to a frame, beam, or shear wall. ( See sheet S5.2) 4) Show on plans the location of the moment resisting frames as called out on calc`s |
| 12/31/2002 | MARTIN HAEBERLE | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Waste pipe sizing differs between the plumbing layout and the isometric. Please clarify. 2. Waste drainpipe reduces from 3" to 2" and then returns to 3". Revise plans 3. Provide upstream and downstream elevation comparisons with lowest fixture drain to verify need for a backwater valve. Reference section 710 UPC/State code. 4. Indicate on roof drainage plans horizontal drain to be a minimum of ΒΌ" per foot or provide calculations utilizing allowed reductions for head pressures. 5. Include in water fixture schedule backflow prevention devices to be used and type. 6. Gas isometric and gas layout differ, (one indicates a 1 1/2" pipe the other 2".) The 2" would be required per Table 12-3 UPC. Revise plans 7. Oxygen storage to be isolated and to be enclosed in a 1-hour enclosure. Reference section 4-3.1.1.2 UPC/State code. Provide details of enclosure. |
| 12/31/2002 | MARTIN HAEBERLE | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a detail for the hoistway ventilation to be provided. Reference section 3004.1 IBC 2. Condensate drains and overflow pan drains to be run separately. Reference Section 307.2.3 IMC 3. Provide mechanical ventilation for vacuum pump system and oxygen storage area per Chapter 4 UPC/State Code. |
| 12/31/2002 | MARTIN HAEBERLE | WATER | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2003 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |