Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T02CM05297
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/09/2003 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. THIS SUBMITTAL IS INCOMPLETE. EVEN IF THE INTENT IS TO SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE BUILDING AND NOTHING MORE AT THIS TIME, THERE ARE SEVERAL MISSING ELEMENTS. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE IS NO AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT FROM THE UTILITY, NO FAULT CURRENT ANALYSIS, NO BRACING INDICATED ON THE MAJOR PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, AND NO "FUTURE" DESIGNATION ON THE PANELS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR. (Please note that, on this scale, it does not appear that there is sufficient clearance between the transformers. NEC 110-26. Sheet CE-2.1) |
01/10/2003 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 1/10/2003 Copies of the stamped approved development, landscape, and NPPO plans must be included in the submittal package prior to approval |
01/14/2003 | JAMES TATE | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | A copy of the stamped approved Development Plan must be included with the submittal. |
01/14/2003 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | Needs to build private sewer / Needs joint use agreement. |
11/18/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/24/2002 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Beams W 8x10 and angle 4x4x5/16 are not on the beam schedule, but are on the calculations. Where do they apply on plans? 2) The bottom of the BEAM-COMPOSITE schedule is unclear, also the line B 16 is unclear. 3) The details at the bottom of the concrete column schedule are unclear. Clarify! 4) Where are structural members RJ8, RJ7,and RJ9 shown on calcs. 5) Show on plans the FLOOR FRAMING ABOVE BASEMENT plan. 6) Are buildings 1 and 2 identicle? 7) Show on plans the location of the moment resisting frames as called out on calc`s. |
12/31/2002 | MARTIN HAEBERLE | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide upstream and downstream elevation comparisons with lowest fixture drain to verify need for a backwater valve. Reference section 710 UPC/State code. |
12/31/2002 | MARTIN HAEBERLE | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a detail for the hoistway ventilation to be provided. Reference section 3004.1 IBC |
12/31/2002 | MARTIN HAEBERLE | WATER | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
01/22/2003 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |