Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM04969
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/10/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/20/2002 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments. |
| 12/20/2002 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Ah-ha-Tinh Consulting 1965 E. Miraval Cuarto Tucson, AZ 85718 (520) 907-5353 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T02CM04969 Pat Egan Automotive Group 4702 E. 22nd Street Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: December 20, 2002 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed as a change of use. Full code compliance is required. DS 2-02 2. Add the adjacent zoning, which is C-2, to the east and south of the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 3. Dimension the wheelstop curbs from the front of parking spaces per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. Wheelstop curbing is to be located two-and-one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C 4. Add the development designators to the project data notes. The development designator for the vehicle sales use in the C-2 zone is "31". The development designator for the billboard use is "32". Also add the restrictions which the proposed use is subject to. The vehicle sales use in the C-2 zone is subject to LUC 3.5.9.5.A and 3.5.9.5.B., which limit the use of outdoor lighting. The billboard use is subject to LUC 3.5.4.26 and 3.5.13.5. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 LUC 2.5.4.2.B.6 5. Provide loading zone calcs based on the proposed vehicle sales use and the square footage of the proposed buildings, and based on the existing billboard use per LUC 3.4.5. A loading space for the vehicle sales use will not be required for a building of less than 1,500 square feet as proposed. However, a loading space is required for the existing billboard use. The required billboard loading zone must meet the minimum required dimensions of 12' × 35'. Revise billboard loading area dimensions accordingly. DS 2-02.2.2.A.5 DS 2-02.2.1.A.14 6. Based on the proposed use (vehicle sales), bicycle parking is required at 4 percent of the vehicle parking spaces provided, all class 1. Provide a bicycle parking calculation detailing how many class 1 bicycle spaces are required and provided. Also, provide a bicycle parking detail, which dimensions the bicycle parking layout, including maneuverability area on the plan per DS 2-09. LUC 3.3.3.5 LUC 3.3.4 DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 7. Please place the recordation information concerning all easements, including docket and page reference numbers for the existing 10-foot utility easement. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 8. Since there is a billboard on site, demonstrate compliance with LUC 3.5.4.26. This includes requirements for loading spaces (see comment 5) and landscaping/ screening. LUC 2.5.4.2.A.5 9. Revise the math in the parking requirements to be correct: 35,000 sq. ft. of lot area ÷ 10,000 sq. ft. = 3.5 = 4 spaces. Check to be sure that the calculation for total proposed vehicle parking is accurate. The number of vehicle spaces shown on the plan is 13 rather than 10. If the three spaces proposed to the west of the building are for employees they may be counted as vehicle parking provided. Please revise calcs if necessary and provide the width of these three spaces. Also, these spaces do not scale to 18 feet in depth as indicated on the plan. Please revise. DS 2-02.2.2.4 10. Dimension the widths of the handicapped space and access ramp individually. Provide the maximum slope of the handicapped ramp to be provided. ANSI/IBC 11. Provide the dimensions and bearings of all lot lines. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 12. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide connection between the buildings and the adjacent streets, including Swan Road, per DS 2-08.3.1. Please revise the plan to show a sidewalk connecting the building to Swan Road. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 13. All lettering must be a minimum of 12 point. Revise all lettering in the details and cross sections which is not the minimum standard for microfilming/archiving. Also, see comment 14 below re: legibility. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 14. Please dimension clearly all MS&R street monument lines for 22nd Street and Swan Rd, including centerline, existing and future curbs, existing and future rights-of-way, existing and future sidewalks, and street widening site plan drawing. The MS&R improvement plans are not legible because of the size of lettering size and the gray mottled background of the detail. Please revise by providing this information on the plan drawing at the same scale as the site plan itself. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 and .21 15. Areas that are striped pedestrian paths which are not cross-walks must be made of concrete and be physically separated from adjacent PAALs/vehicle use area. Please revise pedestrian paths located to the west of the row of vehicle parking. DS 2-08.4.1 16. Please add the legal description of the property to the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 17. Add future and existing site visibility triangles (SVTs) to the intersection of Swan Road and 22nd Street and to the access drive locations along Swan and along 22nd. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 DS 3-03.2.2.C DS 3-01.5 18. It appears that the proposed signs may be located within the SVTs. In addition to providing SVT's per comment #17, please indicate the height of the size and height of the proposed monument signs. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 19. Provide a floor area ratio (FAR) calculation to the plan. The FAR is calculated as the building gross floor area ÷ site area. In this case, the FAR would be calculated as 1440 sq ft ÷ 10,000 sq. ft. = 0.04. The maximum allowed FAR per development designator 31 is 0.90.v The lot coverage calculation may be removed as it is not required for commercial uses. DS 2-02.2.2.A 20. Dimension the width of all access drives. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 21. The PAAL shown along the southern property line does not meet the minimum with requirement for two way traffic. Please indicate if this PAAL is to be striped and signed as "one-way" or revise PAAL width dimension to be at least 24 feet for the portion of the PAAL within the property boundary. Also, a five foot wide pedestrian refuge area with a minimum four-foot wide sidewalk is required between this PAAL and the proposed modular building. The five-foot wide pedestrian refuge is also required along the north side of the building. The refuge areas must include a four-foot wide concrete sidewalk that is physically separate from the PAAL. Please detail and dimension pedestrian sidewalk/refuge areas adjacent to the building. DS 3-05. 2.1.C.1 DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 22. For reference please provide a project location map. DS 2-02.2.1.A.4 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. PMc\siteplans02\T02cm04969a |
| 12/26/2002 | PATRICIA GILBERT | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Currently on the site/landscape plan there is a symbol that appears to indicate an existing tree on site along 22nd Street. Is this tree existing and on the protected plant list? Please clarify landscape plan and revise the NPPO exception application as necessary. LUC 3.8 and 3.8.5. |
| 12/26/2002 | PATRICIA GILBERT | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the existing and future MS&R dimensions. DS 2-07.2.1.A. An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. Provide a future landscape plan (in addition to a site plan) to demonstrate compliance when the future ROW is extended to 150'. LUC 2.8.3.5. Commercially zoned property requires a 30" screen when adjacent to an MS&R Street. Screens may be located within the street landscape border. If a vegetative screen is used, the screen shall be placed at the back of the border and not extend more than three (3) feet into the street landscape border. The loading area for the billboard requires a 6' wall when located within 100' of an MS&R Street. The refuge storage area requires a 6' screen when adjacent to commercial property. Landscape screening requirements can be found in the LUC 3.7.3., table 3.7.2.I., and DS 2-06.3.7. Per 3.7.4.5.A. of the LUC, a water-conserving irrigation system is required for all new landscape plantings. Please provide an irrigation plan. To supplement irrigation, stormwater and runoff harvesting are required elements of the irrigation system. Please address stormwater harvesting on the landscape plan. Refer to LUC 3.7.4.3., 3.7.4.5 and DS. 2-07.2.2.C.5. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each fifteen (15) motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. Add one canopy tree to the vehicle use area for the required parking spaces. LUC 3.7.2.3. and DS 2-06.3.3. Areas where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular or pedestrian traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls. Indicate plant protection around the landscaped areas. LUC 3.7.2.3.B. Per 3.7.2.4., the area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Indicate on the landscape plan decomposed granite within the ROW. All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 9-06.0. Rosmarinus Ingramii, Benenden Blue is currently not listed in the Drought Tolerant Plant List. Please revise plans accordingly. LUC 3.7.2.2. Please clarify the symbol with the notation, "existing trim to 7' CLR & single trunk." Is this tree existing? If the tree is existing give the proper and the common name. Is it on the Native Plant Preservation protected plant list? If the tree is on the protected list please revise the Native Plant Exception Application accordingly. DS 2-07.2.2 Please add a general note addressing maintenance per LUC 3.7.6. |
| 12/26/2002 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: 22nd/Swan Parking Lot Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach DATE: December 26, 2002 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM04969 SUMMARY: The Site Plan, Drainage Report, and Floodplain Use Permit application were received by Engineering on December 23, 2002. The Engineering Section of Development Services has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval for the Floodplain Use Permit application for this project. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Grading Plan purposes only. FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT APPLICATION COMMENT 1) Clearly label the minimum finished grade elevation / minimum finished floor elevations for NAVD'88 and NGVD'29 on Site/Grading Plan. The next submittal should address all comments. Submit revised Site/Grading Plan. If you have any questions, you may call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Section Development Services |
| 12/26/2002 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: 22nd/Swan Parking Lot Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach DATE: December 26, 2002 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM04969 SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on December 23, 2002. The Engineering Section of Development Services has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval for the Site Plan for this project at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Grading Plan purposes only. SITE PLAN COMMENTS 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.3-01.2.7.A: provide 6-foot sidewalk along 22nd Street. 2) DS Sec.6-01.10.Exhibit II: show maneuverability for solid waste design vehicle on plan view. 3) Unless a separate grading plan is submitted, label the Site Plan as A "SITE/GRADING PLAN". 4) Clearly label the minimum finished grade elevation / minimum finished floor elevations for NAVD'88 and NGVD'29 on Site/Grading Plan. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit revised Site/Grading Plan. If you have any questions, you may call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Section Development Services |
| 12/26/2002 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: 22nd/Swan Parking Lot Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach DATE: December 26, 2002 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM04969 SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on December 23, 2002. The Engineering Section of Development Services has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval for the solid waste disposal for this project. SITE PLAN COMMENTS (SANITATION) 1) DS Sec.6-01.10.Exhibit II: show maneuverability for solid waste design vehicle on plan view. The next submittal should address all the comments. Submit revised Site/Grading Plan. If you have any questions, you may call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Section Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2003 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |