Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM04760
Parcel: 133110010

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM04760
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/15/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/16/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Per L.U.C. Sec. 2.2.4, "Civic Assembly" is not a permitted principal or secondary land use in the SR zone. If a previous Administrative Waiver was issued for this site, please submit a copy of the approved waiver with the plan resubmittal. If a waiver has not been approved for this use, one will be required for this expansion. Please contact Craig Gross (Zoning Review Section Manager) at 791-5608 for information regarding the Administrative Waiver process.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31

2. When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. Provide the building area expansion calculation as required by D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6. If the building area expansion is less than 25%, a copy of the last approved site plan must be attached to the new site plan drawings for reference purposes. A copy of the last approved site plan was not found in the submittal package. The following comments are based on a less than 25% building area expansion. If the building area expansion is 25% or greater, additional comments will be forthcoming upon plan resubmittal.
D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2

3. Note the legal description of the property.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2

4. Provide lot dimensions and bearings.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5

5. All existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use must be noted on the plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6

6. a) The number of vehicle parking spaces and bicycle parking spaces required may not be verified for compliance until the principal land use of this site is determined. See above comment number one (1).
b) Provide a fully dimensioned disabled parking space detail, which complies with ANS I 117.1 Sections 406 and 502 curbs, ramps, and parking spaces. The number of disabled parking spaces required must comply with IBC Table 1106.1.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4

7. Indicate on the plan, whether the PAAL south of the new senior center is one-way or two-way. If proposed for two-way the PAAL must be a minimum 24 feet wide per L.U.C. Table 3.3.7-I.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11

8. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed freestanding signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

9. Fully dimension the loading space on the plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14

10. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

11. Provide the gross site area.
D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6

12. a) Provide the floor area ratio (F.A.R.) calculation and lot coverage calculation.
b) Note the maximum allowed F.A.R. and maximum allowed lot coverage for this site.
D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3

13. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
10/21/2002 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied Refer to Zoning Review comment number 6b.
11/15/2002 ANY ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Steven Mitchell
Durant Architects
2980 N. Campbell Ave.
SUBJECT: 7200 E. Tanque Verde Road
Site plan T02CM04760 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 05

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan, Grading plan and Drainage Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Grading plan (GP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Contingent on the planning dept. comment no. 2, if the building area expansion is 25% or greater, additional comments may be forth coming upon re-submittal.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
4. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6.
5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
6. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
10. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
11. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22.
12. Please provide existing topograpghic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
13. Show activity number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
14. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
15. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S 3-01.4.4.
16. Add note regarding depressing all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting.
17. Show and fully dimension the det./ret. basin.
18. Install post barricades at back of side walk at the drop off location.
19. The keynote call out east of the new bldg. (no. 23) is not pointing to a tree and an arrow in the existing parking points to nothing. Please correct.
20. At the loading zone there is a key note call out (no. 28) that shouldn't be pointing to the loading zone. Please correct.
21. The key note call out (no. 27) is pointing to a door way not a berm. Please correct.
22. On the SP, the labels for the contour elevations are shown. Please show contours or since the GP is included the construction documents, the contour labels may be turned off.
23. Call out the steel plate lintel (no. 40) at the other location south, typical of the both.
24. Key note no. 41 is pointing to the det./ret. basin. Is this correct? If not revise.

Grading plan:
1. Show and fully dimension the det./ret. basin.
2. Show activity number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
3. The GP does not match the drainage report in the basin area.
4. Add basin maintenance responsibility note to grading notes.
5. List the cut/fill on plans.
6. The Basis of elevation must include a Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
7. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S 3-01.4.4.
8. Add note regarding depressing all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting.
9. In the southwest area of the fire lane, key note 4 is called out along with detail 9/C1.2
10. Call out the length of the depressed curb opening by the existing PAAL and by the loading zone.
11. There are two key notes that are relatively the same (no. 18 & no. 22). Please explain.
12. Where is key note 31 called out?
13. Should detail 2/C1.2 also call out an extruded curb? Can both conditions apply in different locations.

Drainage Report:
Is accepted and approved. On future submittals please list project address on the cover of all reports, studies, statements etc.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul Machado
Senior Engineering Associate,
11/19/2002 ANY SANITATION REVIEW Denied See engineering comments.
11/19/2002 ANY FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied See engineering comments.
11/20/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
11/20/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/20/2002 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed