Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T02CM04639
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/05/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/13/2002 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Provide a copy of the recorded Major Streets and Routes Covenant for Development Services Department records. 2. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1, the proposed pedestrian access located south of the retention/detention basin must be a sidewalk which is physically separated from the PAAL by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means. Demonstrate compliance on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12/ D.S. 2-08 3. Since a wall and free standing sign are located in the future right-of-way, a stamp will be added to the site plan which states that all improvements located within the MS&R area (future right-of-way) must be removed at the time of street widening at no expense to the city. 4. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact me at the number below to set an appointment. 5. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 12/23/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The site is subject to the MS&R overlay zone. Provide copy of MS&R covenant required for temporary use of the MS&R right of way area. LUC 2.8.3.5.F 2) Indicate on the plan the proposed ground plane treatments for all areas of the site including parking and outdoor display areas. LUC 3.7.2.7 |
| 12/31/2002 | JAMES TATE | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/31/2002 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Cut and Fill quantities in Note 29 are incorrect. A Grading Plan and permit are required. Correct the the estimated cut and fill. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/17/2003 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |