Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM04576
Parcel: 120082440

Address:
4718 S 6TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM04576
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/18/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/27/2003 DAVID RIVERA HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See zoning comments.
03/27/2003 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied FROM: David Rivera
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T03CM04576
4718 S. 6th Avenue
Site Plan
USE: Auto Rental and Vehicle Sales DD "31"

Transmittal date: 1st Review March 27, 2003

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for full code compliance under the assumption that the office of Pima County Assessor's can approve the lot combo. The Tax Code Parcel combo form states that the lot combo was disapproved. Therefore until approval is granted for the lot combo the Zoning Review will be made but approval of the site plan will not be granted. The Zoning review Section has done research into whether the alley is actually dedicated right-of-way or an easement per Map and Plat 7/48. Please contact Jim Rossi with the City of Tucson Real Estate Division at 791-4181 with regards to further information and procedure of use of the existing alley/easement.

2. It appears that the two lots in question have not been approved for lot combo. The assessor's office records indicate two separate tax code parcel numbers still exist. Therefore the combo has not been completed. The Development Services Department will require that the parcels be legally combined prior to approval of the site plan. Other issues that must be addressed include interest and the use of the easement by utility companies and possibly the use of the easement by the C.O.T. Solid Waste Department for refuse collection. Letters from the all parties that may have interest or use of the easement must be contacted and informed of the proposed development, which is proposed on both these lots and over the existing alley/easement. Letters of confirmation from all utility parties including C.O.T. to allow the development to proceed and that requirements of development over this alley/easement is done with there approval must be provided with the next site plan submittal packet.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

3. The location map must cover one square mile. The scale of the location map must be a minimum of 3" = 1mile. Revise the map as required.
DS 2-2.2.1.A.4

4. Please insure that the width of the PAAL area between the parking spaces and the vehicle display area is a minimum of 24 feet. Based on the drawing the PAAL width is 22 feet.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.8

In addition show the required accessible ramp adjacent to the handicap parking space access aisle. Indicate the slope and direction of the ramp. The minimum slope allowed is 1:12. The access ramp must be part of the continuous pedestrian circulation. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

5. Off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage. Please add a detail drawing that demonstrates compliance. Show and label directional signage on the plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.9

6. The existing and future sight visibility triangles must be shown and labeled. The right-of-way as shown and labeled does not reflect the existing conditions of the roadway. The existing right-of-way is a total of 80 feet with a half right-of-way of 40 feet. The drawing must be revised to reflect current and future conditions. Per the MS&R Map the total right-of-way for Sixth Avenue will be 120 feet with a 60 feet half right-of-way. The future widening will affect the present site by the acquisition of the additional 20 feet of right-of-way. The site must designed to meet code in the present and future based on today's code requirements. Revise the plan to meet all present code requirements based on the future right-of-way take or separate site plan and landscape plan that demonstrates how the site will meet codes in the future must be submitted. The future site plan will become an exhibit to a recorded covenant. See LUC section 2.8.3.5.F for more information regarding the future site plan and covenant.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 and DS 2-02.2.1.A.19

7. Label the size of the existing sign. The sign will be within the future sight visibility triangle and must be relocated unless the sign meets the criteria for objects or structures within a sigh visibility triangle. See DS 3-01.5.1.A.1 - .2. If the sign meets the criteria add detail drawing that demonstrates compliance.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.13

8. Dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines must be labeled.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.

9. If applicable indicate existing or proposed freestanding lighting.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.25

10. Refer to the landscape reviewer comments regarding landscape borders, screening, and NPPO requirements.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 and DS 2-02.2.1.C

11. Add a LUC data block that includes all development criteria requirements. The criteria that must be included is the allowed and proposed floor area ratio, building heights, number of required and provided vehicle/bicycle parking spaces which includes handicap spaces etc. The proposed use must also be listed: Vehicle Rental and Sales Use: DD "31" Subject to LUC sections 3.5.9.5.A and .B.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.1 - .4

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents.
04/07/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: O & E Used Cars
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 7 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM04576

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan and drainage statement received on March 28, 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL
1. The drainage statement provided does not meet the minimum requirements for drainage submittals addressing critical basin flow reduction in the City of Tucson. Current policy requires a 15% reduction in the 2,10 and 100-year developed condition flood peaks exiting the site. A drainage report addressing this policy is required before a proper and thorough review can be provided. For drainage report content and format requirements, refer to Section 2.3.1 of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), or Development Standard (DS) 10-02.0;
SITE PLAN COMMENTS
2. Depict lot dimensions and bearings, with basis of bearing, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5;
3. Provide proposed drainage patterns, finished floor elevation and finish grades (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
4. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
5. Depict, label and dimension the 20' public alley (right of way) bisecting the site (DS 2-02.2.1.19);
6. Depict, label and dimension new sidewalk, driveway apron and any other improvements in the 6th Avenue right of way, with reference to Public Improvement Plan # (I-96-42) (DS 2-02.2.1.21 & DS 3-01.3.3 A.);
7. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent, with Benchmark based of City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT field book and page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23);
8. New commercial projects/developments are required to provide a centralized, onsite refuse storage, collection and pickup area, in accordance with Development Standard 6-01.4.0. Provide written approval from Solid Waste Management Department for the proposed pickup location, or demonstrate conformance with the above Development Standard (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.0);
9. Depict and label sidewalk scuppers, per Pima County/COT Standard Details for Public Improvements (1994) adjacent to the proposed building, to ensure roof drainage is conveyed under sidewalk areas during a 10-year frequency flood event (DS 2-08.4.1 E & 3-01.2.8 A);
10. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, Section 3.7.4.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/07/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: O & E Used Cars
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 7 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM04576

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan and drainage statement received on March 28, 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL
1. The drainage statement provided does not meet the minimum requirements for drainage submittals addressing critical basin flow reduction in the City of Tucson. Current policy requires a 15% reduction in the 2,10 and 100-year developed condition flood peaks exiting the site. A drainage report addressing this policy is required before a proper and thorough review can be provided. For drainage report content and format requirements, refer to Section 2.3.1 of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), or Development Standard (DS) 10-02.0;
SITE PLAN COMMENTS
2. Depict lot dimensions and bearings, with basis of bearing, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5;
3. Provide proposed drainage patterns, finished floor elevation and finish grades (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
4. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
5. Depict, label and dimension the 20' public alley (right of way) bisecting the site (DS 2-02.2.1.19);
6. Depict, label and dimension new sidewalk, driveway apron and any other improvements in the 6th Avenue right of way, with reference to Public Improvement Plan # (I-96-42) (DS 2-02.2.1.21 & DS 3-01.3.3 A.);
7. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent, with Benchmark based of City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT field book and page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23);
8. New commercial projects/developments are required to provide a centralized, onsite refuse storage, collection and pickup area, in accordance with Development Standard 6-01.4.0. Provide written approval from Solid Waste Management Department for the proposed pickup location, or demonstrate conformance with the above Development Standard (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.0);
9. Depict and label sidewalk scuppers, per Pima County/COT Standard Details for Public Improvements (1994) adjacent to the proposed building, to ensure roof drainage is conveyed under sidewalk areas during a 10-year frequency flood event (DS 2-08.4.1 E & 3-01.2.8 A);
10. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, Section 3.7.4.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/07/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: O & E Used Cars
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 7 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02CM04576

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the site plan and drainage statement received on March 28, 2003. Approval is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL
1. The drainage statement provided does not meet the minimum requirements for drainage submittals addressing critical basin flow reduction in the City of Tucson. Current policy requires a 15% reduction in the 2,10 and 100-year developed condition flood peaks exiting the site. A drainage report addressing this policy is required before a proper and thorough review can be provided. For drainage report content and format requirements, refer to Section 2.3.1 of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM), or Development Standard (DS) 10-02.0;
SITE PLAN COMMENTS
2. Depict lot dimensions and bearings, with basis of bearing, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.5;
3. Provide proposed drainage patterns, finished floor elevation and finish grades (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
4. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
5. Depict, label and dimension the 20' public alley (right of way) bisecting the site (DS 2-02.2.1.19);
6. Depict, label and dimension new sidewalk, driveway apron and any other improvements in the 6th Avenue right of way, with reference to Public Improvement Plan # (I-96-42) (DS 2-02.2.1.21 & DS 3-01.3.3 A.);
7. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2 feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent, with Benchmark based of City of Tucson (COT) datum, including COT field book and page numbers (DS 2-02.2.1.23);
8. New commercial projects/developments are required to provide a centralized, onsite refuse storage, collection and pickup area, in accordance with Development Standard 6-01.4.0. Provide written approval from Solid Waste Management Department for the proposed pickup location, or demonstrate conformance with the above Development Standard (DS 2-02.2.1.32 & 6-01.0);
9. Depict and label sidewalk scuppers, per Pima County/COT Standard Details for Public Improvements (1994) adjacent to the proposed building, to ensure roof drainage is conveyed under sidewalk areas during a 10-year frequency flood event (DS 2-08.4.1 E & 3-01.2.8 A);
10. Demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, Section 3.7.4.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/22/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
04/22/2003 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/28/2003 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
04/23/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed