Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T02CM03991
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/09/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/15/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning comments |
| 10/15/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T02CM03991- Site Plan Texaco Gas Station Addition - greater than fifty (50) percent expansion. Full code compliance required. TRANSMITTAL: Second review October 15, 2002 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The site is an existing gas station, offering automotive service and repair, with a storage/repair building added to the north side of the existing station building without permits. This expansion is a greater than 50 percent of the original building, which requires the entire site to be brought into compliance with LUC regulations for motor vehicle and bicycle parking and design, MS&R requirements, pedestrian access provisions, loading space provision, and landscaping, screening and NPPO compliance. 2. Based on the eight (8) repair bays a total of 42 vehicle-parking spaces are required. In addition the design of the parking lot must meet current code requirements, such as 24 feet wide PAALs for two way traffic, angle parking must meet the requirements as specified in the LUC table 3.3.7-I which includes the PAAL width requirement between the cars parked at the pumps and the angle parking spaces. Of the 22 vehicle parking spaces provided five (5) of the spaces are within the future sight visibility triangles and possibly the future right of way. These spaces will be lost as a result of any future widening of Speedway Boulevard and the required ten feet wide landscape buffer that must be provided entirely on site. The site is deficient in the number of parking spaces required by twenty spaces the widening would result in a total deficiency of twenty-five spaces. A Board of Adjustment variance of twenty-five vehicle parking spaces to LUC section 3.3.4 to permit the existing site to provide a total of twenty-two spaces now and seventeen in the future after the Speedway widening occurs would be required. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 3. The width of the PAAL between the building and the parking space as noted in the previous comment must be 24 feet wide. A variance for a 12 PAAL would be required or the PAAL width must be revised to 24 feet. LUC 3.3.7.2 and table 3.3.7-I. (Previous Comment: Clarify how the vehicles are brought into the rear building. It does not appear that sufficient clearance is provided between the southwest corner of the building and the parking spaces along the west side of the parcel. If the vehicles are to be brought via the adjacent parcel PAAL provide a copy of the recorded cross access agreement. Show and label the easement. Add the docket and page numbers and dimension the width of the easement on the site plan. A copy of the cross access agreement must be provided with the next submittal. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 4. The locations of the accessible ramps have not been depicted on the plan. The minimum slope of the ramp is 1:12. The 1:10 slope is for the flares of the ramp. Add fully dimensioned detail drawings of the proposed ramps that demonstrate compliance. If the ramps are to be typical one detail drawing is sufficient with a note indicating typical. If more than one type of accessible ramp is proposed because of location or space restrictions provide a detail for each specific ramp location and type. The proposed crosswalk along the west side of the canopy does not connect to the pedestrian circulation and ends behind the vehicle bay. This location is unsafe for the pedestrian. Please relocate to the east side of the canopy and connect to the pedestrian circulation. (Previous Comment: All pedestrian sidewalks must be constructed of concrete except at locations where the path crosses a PAAL. Label the sections of the sidewalks that will be constructed of concrete and dimension the width. The minimum width must be four feet. See DS 2-08.4.0 for further information. The pedestrian circulation path must be accessible for the handicapped. Please demonstrate on the plan how the accessible ramps comply with the I.C.C. section 405. It is not clear on the plan how the ramps have been designed. The slope ratio must be labeled. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 5. One 12 feet by 35 feet loading space is required for this use, per LUC section 3.4.5 table 3 section 3.4.5.3, 1,500 sq. ft. to 10,000 sq. ft. buildings. Provide a loading space and demonstrate compliance with maneuverability into and out of the loading space. DS 2-02.2.1.A.14 6. See landscape reviewer comments regarding landscape borders, screening and NPPO requirements. DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 7. Please ensure that all changes that are made to the site plan are made to the landscape plan. Also any required changes made to the existing site plan that may affect the future site plan must be addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/21/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The site and landscape plans are unclear regarding wall locations. Please clarify where walls are to be constructed and where only curbs are to be constructed. Provide a detail for screen wall. DS 2-07.2.2 Provide documentation of approval from The City Engineer to locate portions of the street landscape border within adjacent right of way areas. Without the required approvals the landscape borders are substandard. Although a note has been added regarding the red bird of paradise, the plans require revision. The planting plan must accurately depict the locations of all proposed plantings. Based on the area available for planting, the number of plants could not possibly accomodated. This constraint also affects the coverage calculations. The area specified for location of the refuse container must be screened from all adjacent commercial properties per LUC 3.7.2-I. Any required loading areas must also be screened per LUC 3.7.2-I. |
| 10/31/2002 | ANY | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | See engineering folder. |
| 10/31/2002 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | To: E.J. Ornelas & Associates Architects 100 N. Stone Ave. SUBJECT: Texaco Gas Station Site plan T02CM02291 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 01 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan Site Plan: All comments have been addressed. The SP is now approved. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate, |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/01/2002 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |