Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM03587
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN 1. Indicate property description. D.S. 2-02.2.1.2 2. Indicate project address. D.S. 2-02.2.1.3 3. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including roof slope and down spouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.6 4. Revise existing and future sight visibility triangle lengths to read; Near 185' and Far 110'. D.S. 2-02.2.1.10 5. Indicate limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation. D.S. 2-02.2.1.15 6. Indicate drainage flow patterns, proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. D.S. 2-02.2.1.16 7. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities. D.S. 2-02.2.1.17 8. Indicate if street is Public or Private. D.S. 2-02.2.1.18 9. Indicate dimension of right-of-way. D.S. 2-02.2.1.19 10. Indicate dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.21 11. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.23 12. The PAAL on the eastside of Lot 19 needs to be 14' wide for a Solid waste collection truck to maneuver through. 13. Revise the curbed median on the north parking lot between the 14 and 10 parking lots. Site and grading plan should match. 14. Indicate the wall height for the refuse container on detail. D.S. 2-02.2.1.21 DRAINAGE REPORT 1. A Floodplain Use Permit is required. An application can be picked up at the COT-DSD/Engineering counter. 2. Indicate more drainage flow arrows. 3. Include a dimensioned inlet grate detail. 4. Indicate calculations for the 190 LF + 8" HDPE in the drainage report. 5. Include a cross section of basin with weir. |
| 08/20/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER. |
| 08/20/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER. |
| 08/27/2002 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. The legal description noted on sheet A1 (All of lots 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21, and 22…) does not match the lots shown on the drawing (lots 18 & 19). If lots are being developed individually, please provide separate calculations (i.e. vehicle, bicycle, loading, GFA) for each lot. In addition, a perpetual cross access agreement will be required. If lots 18 and 19 are to be developed as one, lot combination will be required. Attached is a copy of the lot combination covenant prepared by the City Attorney's Office, which must be recorded prior to site plan approval. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Note the project address. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 3. a) Note the proposed land use, development designator, and applicable "subject to" section as it is listed under L.U.C. Sec. 2.7.2.2. Building setback, height and size requirements, vehicle, bicycle, loading space, and floor area calculations may not be verified for compliance until this information is provided. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon resubmittal. b) Under the code review block please revise "maximum building height per Pima County Zoning Code" to the correct jurisdiction. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6,.7,.8,.9/ D.S. 2-02.2.A.3,.4,.5 4. Dimension the width of the points of ingress and egress. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 5. a) Dimension the width of the on-site pedestrian circulation system. Minimum width for on-site sidewalk is four (4) feet. Where a vehicle parking space abuts a sidewalk and the sidewalk is less than 6.5 feet wide, a wheelstop is required. The wheelstop must be two and one-half (2½) feet in front of the parking space. b) Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B, a sidewalk must be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where a building is located. A striped pedestrian path may only be located where it crosses a PAAL. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 6. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed freestanding signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 7. Note the gross and net lot area. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.1 8. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 08/27/2002 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/04/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A 5' high screen is required to screen the industrial land use from the adjacent comercially zoned property along the south west property line. LUC Table 3.7.2-I Per DS 2-06.3.7 In situations where a utility or drainage easement runs along a property line and the width of easement lying within a site is not used as part of the site, then the required screen can be located at the easement line. 2) Revise the legal description on the landscape plan to avoid confusion with Freeway Industrial Park Bk. 54 Pg. 18. The proposed development is located within Freeway Industrial (Subdivision) Bk. 15 Pg. 73. City Engineer approval is required in order to locate a portion of the required landscaping within the adjacent City right of way. Provide documentation of any approvals. Plan cannot be approved by this section without verification. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2 |
| 09/04/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/06/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/22/2002 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |