Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T02CM03484
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/16/2002 | DAVE WITT | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T02CM03484 12/16/02 2361 E.CAMERON VISTA PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. SCOPE OF REVIEW: THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2000 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ΒΌ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE. 2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. ADDITIONS BEAMS APPEAR TO BE INADEQUATE. WHAT IS THE BEAM AT THE RIDGE OF THE CARPORT FOR? THE TRUSSES DON'T APPEAR TO ACCOMMODATE A RIDGE BEAM. ALSO, PLEASE CLARIFY THE HIP; TRUSS OR 2X10 ? 2. HOW DO THE ROOF AREAS BETWEEN THE CARPORT/EXISTING AND EXISTING/HOBBY ROOM DRAIN? 3. ADDITIONS TRUSSES T5 AND T6A DON'T APPEAR ADEQUATE TO SUPPORT THE RIDGE BEAM OVER THE HOBBY ROOM. 4. ITTM APPEARS TO BE INADEQUATE TO CONNECT THE CARPORT 6X12 TO THE MASONRY. 5. SPEC THE SPECIES AND GRADE OF THE CARPORT 6X12. 6. DETAIL AND SPEC A MASONRY/WOOD CONNECTION FOR THE CARPORT COLUMNS TO BEAM. 7. SPECIFY AND DETAIL ALL OVER FRAMING. IF SOLID SHEATHING IS USED ON THE LOWER TRUSSES, PROVIDE MINIMUM OPENINGS OF 22" BY 30" FOR ACCESS AND VENTILATION INTO OVER FRAMED AREAS (>30 S.F.). IF SOLID SHEATHING IS NOT USED ON LOWER TRUSSES, PROVIDE DETAILS FOR BRACING OF TOP CHORD OF LOWER TRUSSES. 8. OVERHANG IS NOT PERMITTED FOR THE GARAGE WALL 2 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. ALSO, EXTEND THE FIRE RATEING TO THE DECK. 9. PROVIDE A BOND BEAM AT THE TOP OF THE MASONRY WALL IN DETAIL B/SHT.1 . 10. DESIGN CRITERIA ON SHEET 4, THE DEAD LOAD OF A 4" SLAB IS NOT 20 PSF. 11. ADDITIONS TRUSS T6A 9 ( ETC.) NEEDS SUPPORT AT THE WEST END. 12. WHERE DO ADDITION TRUSSES T9 AND T10 GO? SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. PROVIDE A CONNECTION DETAIL FOR THE WOODEN BEAM ON THE CARPORT TO THE MASONRY COLUMN. 2. PROVIDE A BOND BEAM AT THE TOP OF THE MASONRY WALL IN DETAIL 1 ON SHT. 3 . IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: DAVE WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 1110 ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK COMMENTS PLEASE SEE THE ORIGINAL LIST OF COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/17/2002 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |