Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM03109
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2002 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/28/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/02/2002 | JIM TATE | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | See engineering folder for comments. |
| 07/02/2002 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all engineering, flood plain, and solid waste comments have been addressed. 1. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Site Plan approval. 2. The future right-of-way for Stone is 120 ft. (intersection widening based on a mid-block width of 90 ft.). 3. The future right-of-way width for Fort Lowell is 130 ft. (intersection widening based on mid-block width of 100 ft.). 4. The minimum sidewalk width on a major streets and routes (MS&R) street is 6 ft. Both Stone and Fort Lowell are MS&R streets. The sidewalk location on Fort Lowell is 2.5 ft. from face of future curb. Face of future curb is 11 ft from future right-of-way. The sidewalk location on Stone is 1.5 ft. from face of future curb. Face of future curb is 10 ft. from future right-of-way. 5. Show the existing and future sight visibility triangles at both driveways and the corner of Fort Lowell and Stone. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 6. There must be a minimum of one-foot separation between the four-foot wide sidewalk and any adjacent structure. The proposed sidewalk on the east side of the building is only 4'-7". 7. Hydrology report is required. Show limits of the 100-yr. floodplain and water surface elevations. Discuss encroachment of the building addition in the floodplain. Establish finish floor elevations which assure that the structure is free from flooding during a 100-yr. flood. Discuss proposed on-site drainage. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 2.1.2 & 2.3.1.4.F 8. Enclosures for dumpster containers require steel pipes between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewalls. DS 6-01.4.2.C.2 |
| 07/02/2002 | JIM TATE | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | Flood Use Permit is required. Hydrology Report is required. See Engineering folder for additional comments. |
| 07/10/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T02CM03109 7454 E. Broadway Boulevard Coronado Market SITE PLAN (First Review) TRANSMITTAL: July 10, 2002 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Show and label existing or proposed freestanding signage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 2. Show and dimension the future right-of-way curb locations. The intersection widening will differ from the mid-block major street width. Refer to engineering comments regarding this issue. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 and .20 3. See landscape reviewer comments regarding landscape borders, screening, and NPPO requirements. DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 4. Under the C-2 zone section of the Land Use Code Development Designator 28 or Market is not found as a development designator or as a specific use respectively. Please add the actual use class and specific use: i.e. Retail Trade Use Group; General Merchandise DD "31". All calculations, which were based on development designator 28, must be revised to appropriate designator. Revise as required. Please clarify the use of the commercial kitchen on this site. Further comments may be forthcoming on this issue. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 07/23/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/23/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Any new development such as landscaping, hardscape additions, parking areas and sidewalks on an existing site are subject to review, as the exception applies only to existing development. LUC 3.7.1.2 A landscape plan is required for new plantings and devlopment of the site must be incompliance with LUC 2.8.3.5 Major Streets and Routes Overlay Zone. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2002 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |