Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T02CM03020
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T02CM03020 340 S. Stone Avenue First Credit Union Financial Services Use ( 2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL: August 6, 2002 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD One of the requirements upon re-submittal of the site plan is to attach a response letter that states how all comments related to Land Use Code and Development Standards issues were addressed. A response letter was not submitted with the site plan submittal of August 5, 2002. Therefore several comments from the previous review were re-issued. See the following comments prepared August 6, 2002. 1. Historic review and approval required. Copies of or the approved and stamped plans which were reviewed by the Development Services Historic Review Board must accompany the new site plan submittal. A copy of the HPZ approval letter must also be included. (Previous Comment: This project has been reviewed for full code compliance as a result of a greater than 100 percent building expansion. This site is also subject to the Major Streets and Routes overlay zone criteria. The site is Zoned HC-3 and must be reviewed and approved through a Historic Review Board. Contact Frank Podgorski at 791-4541 with regards to the Historic Review process.) 2. As stated in the previous comment dated June 27, 2002, a Parcel Tax Code Combo and a Lot Combo Covenant are required to be processed prior to approval of the site plan. Copies of both executed documents must be submitted along with the next site plan submittal. (Previous Comment: This development appears to be developed over two separate parcels but functions as one site. One of the conditions of approval of the site plan will be to do a Pima County Tax Code Parcel combo and a lot combo covenant recordation. The Tax Code Parcel combo is handled through the Pima County Assessor's office. The Lot Combo Covenant is a document, which is required by the City of Tucson Attorney's office. The lot combo covenant form may be downloaded from the DSD web site. The file is in a PDF format and can be viewed and printed through the program Acrobat Reader. (If you have any questions regarding this comment feel free to call me.) Copies of the lot combo form and the recorded covenant must be submitted with the plans.) The lot dimensions will have to be revised to indicate or delineate one parcel. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 3. The building setbacks from Cushing Street and Stone Avenue must be dimensioned from the back of the future curb location. The setbacks are based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure. The proposed building height must be labeled on the footprint and allowed and proposed height must be listed in the project data block. (Previous Comment: All building setbacks from the all property lines to all structures including exiting setbacks to existing structures must be shown on the plan. The building setbacks from the future back of curb locations for Cushing Street and Stone Avenue must also be shown. See Engineering comments or contact the Engineering reviewer regarding the future Right of way widths and future curb locations for both Cushing Street and Stone Avenue.) DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 4. Prior to the first review of this site plan a commercial reviewer would review the handi-cap requirements such as handi-cap parking spaces and the slopes for handi-cap ramps. Unfortunately the reviewer (Phil Seader) retired and the Zoning reviewers were given the task of reviewing handi-cap requirements on site reviews. A co-worker approved the handi-cap section of the Review Record Card. As we were all new to this type of review a couple of items were not caught on the handi-cap review. The following items should be labeled and added. The slopes of the ramps next to the building must be labeled. The maximum slope requirement is 1:12. The length of the ramps must be dimensioned. A symbol that indicates a handi-cap sign must be added to the handi-cap parking space and labeled as follows, "Disabled Parking Sign - Section 1107.3 1994 Uniform Building Code Revised." DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 LUC 3.3.4 DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 5. Indicate the type of facility that will be used for the bicycle parking, Post and ring, ribbon etc and indicate the location of the access aisle. (Previous Comment: This project must be provided with a minimum of two class two bicycle parking spaces. Show the location, annotate and dimension on the plan the bicycle parking facility. The type of facility that will be used must be noted. See DS 2-09 for more information regarding bicycle parking. If the facility is placed in a location not visible from the street, signage directing the bicyclists to the parking facility must be provided. Show signage on the plan if required. Add the required and provided number (calculation) of bicycle parking spaces to the project data block.) DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 6. Please dimension the future curb location based on the future right-of-way line location for both Cushing Street and Stone Avenue. (Previous Comment: The existing and future curb locations must be labeled and dimensioned. Street building setbacks (when the property fronts a major street) are measured from the back of existing and future curb location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 7.If applicable, list zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project, such as a Board of Adjustment (B/A) variance, a Lot Development Option (LDO) modification, or a Project Design Option (PDO) modification, by case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. DS 2-02.2.1.A.38 8. Please list under the Project Data block the number of loading spaces required and the number provided. (Previous Comment: Please revise and add all required LUC calculations, i.e. vehicle/bicycle parking, loading spaces, building heights, loading spaces, etc. DS 2-02.2.2.A 9. Because there was no response letter provided with the site plan submittal it is not clear if the billboard issue has been fully addressed. Documents regarding the lease agreement for the removal of the billboard must be provided for review by the City Attorney's Office. (Previous Comment: Per keynote four (4), this site has an existing billboard. This site has been reviewed for full code compliance and therefore the requirements for the billboard must also comply. The billboard must meet full code compliance or be removed. If the billboard is to be removed provide documentation that indicates that the lease agreement has expired or can be broken in order to remove the billboard. If the billboard is to remain, a loading space is required and must be provided. The loading space to be provided must be separate from the required loading space for the financial use. Landscaping and screening may also be required see landscape reviewer comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\dsc\T02CM03020b.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and all documents requested. 201 N. STONE AVENUE - TUCSON, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 * FAX (520) 879-8010 www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd |
| 08/28/2002 | ANY | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | The sanitation portion of this project is approved. |
| 08/28/2002 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Paul O'Connor, A.I.A. Architect SUBJECT: 340 N. Stone Ave., Site plan T02CM03020 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 28 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S 3-01.4.4. Show the proposed scupper under the sidewalks. 2. Show Drainage patterns per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 3. List estimated cut and fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. If both are 0 cy, please indicate. 4. Show existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. 5. Key note 24 is not called out on the plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado, Senior Engineering Associate, |
| 08/28/2002 | ANY | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See engineering folder. |
| 08/30/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Show and label all screen walls on the landscape plan, include heights. Walls may only be located within the street landscape border under certain circumstances. Per LUC 3.7.3.2.C. the walls may not encroach no more than three feet. Also screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street. LUC 3.7.3 Revise the plans to address the proposed wall along Stone Avenue. Any allowed billboards on the site must be landscaped and screened per LUC 3.7.2-I and may need loading areas which also require landscaping and screening. Refer to Zoning comments and revise the landscape plan as necessary. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2002 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |