Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T02CM02833
Parcel: 11714146A

Address:
196 W SIMPSON ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T02CM02833
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/01/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Approved
08/02/2002 MARK TITUS WATER REVIEW Approved
08/08/2002 PIMA COUNTY BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied See attached comments.
08/08/2002 MSTPAUL1 WWM REVIEW Passed
08/08/2002 DAVE MANN MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
08/08/2002 DAVE MANN ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
08/08/2002 DAVE MANN PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
08/22/2002 BLANCA ESPINO FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied 1. As per Chapter 26: Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management and the C.O.T. Flood Hazard Maps, this site falls into this ordinance. According to City Flood Hazard Maps, this site is in the flood hazard area of Simpson Wash (wash runoff is about 268 cubic feet per second) regulatory flow. For those watercourses where regulatory floodplains are not delineated on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps, the regulatory floodplains shall be determined by engineering studies. An engineering study shall meet the requirements of these regulations and shall include hydrologic and hydraulic analyses prepared by a state registered professional civil engineer and approved by the city engineer. Sec. 26-3

2. A Hydrology Report is required, in order to determine if the site is impacted by the regulatory floodplain and to determine if the proposed development encroaches in that floodplain.

3. If the site is impacted by the regulatory floodplain, and the proposed structure is in the floodplain, a Floodplain Use Permit shall be required to ensure that the proposed building finished floor elevation is one foot above the regulatory flood elevation and the proposed improvements do not raise the flood elevation more than one tenth of a foot.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/23/2002 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed