Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM02772
Parcel: 107051010

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM02772
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/24/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/25/2002 BLANCA ESPINO FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER.
07/25/2002 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Site Plan
1. Indicate project address on plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.3

2. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings and structures for roof slopes and downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.6

3. Indicate limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation as shown in Figure 4 of the Drainage Report. D.S. 2-02.2.1.15

4. Indicate drainage patterns, proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. D.S. 2-02.2.1.16

5. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities. D.S. 2-02.2.1.17

6. Indicate if streets are Public or Private. D.S. 2-02.2.1.18

7. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. The space between the back of curb and sidewalk is 3'. A 4 foot sidewalk is required along 14th Ave. D.S. 2-02.2.1.21

8. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. Delineate the 100-year floodplain. D.S. 2-02.2.1 .23
07/25/2002 BLANCA ESPINO SANITATION REVIEW Approved
08/02/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Note the project address.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3

2. Fully dimension the back-up spurs on the plan. Refer to D.S. 3-05.2.2.D for design criteria.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ D.S. 3-05.2.2.D

3.Note the type of paving material to be provided for the bicycle parking spaces. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria.
D.S. 2-02.2.1A.9/ D.S. 2-09

4. a) Minimum width required for on-site sidewalks is four (4) feet.
b) Provide a sidewalk which connects the on-site pedestrian circulation system to the sidewalk in the Laguna Street right-of-way.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12/ D.S. 2-08.5.1.A/ D.S. 2-08.4.1

5. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed freestanding signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

6. a) Under the zoning information block on sheet one (1), revise the development designator from "S" to "R".
b) Under the lot coverage calculation block on sheet one (1), revise the maximum allowed lot coverage from 80% to 70%.
D.S. 2-02.2.1A.31

7. Detail the handicap ramp. Minimum 1:12 slope. Dimension flush landing. Indicate direction of slope.

8. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
08/02/2002 DAN CASTRO HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied Refer to Zoning Review comment number seven (7).
08/06/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Revise the screen wall location along 14th Avenue. LUC 3.7.3.2.C.3 "Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border."

Per LUC 3.7.2.7. "Except as otherwise provided by this Division, the area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk
and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with
an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite." Revise note regarding DG and indicate DG or equal for all adjacent right of way areas.

Identify the type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material) proposed to meet the requirements. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3
08/06/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied A native plant preservation plan or application is required. Plans will not be accepted for resubmittal with the required information. LUC 3.8, DS2-15

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/22/2002 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed