Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM02240
Parcel: 10408083B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM02240
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/22/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
05/30/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Site plan scale on sheet C1.1 states the gross site area is 7.37 acres, which differs from the 2.25 acres noted under the land use code review block on the same page. Please delete the incorrect note.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1

2. All existing easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

3. Light poles indicated on the plan appear to interfere with vehicle parking and maneuverability. Relocate light poles to an area that will not interfere or obstruct vehicle or pedestrian circulation.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

4. Add the applicable 'subject to" section under the proposed use note on sheet C1.1: "subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.15".
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31

5. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 and .2, a minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between the building and the PAAL. Please provide the required pedestrian refuge area along the west building walls and east building wall. The pedestrian refuge area along the east building wall may have a roof for shade, provided it contains a sidewalk and pedestrian access which is unobstructed and is set back one (1) foot from the PAAL. The pedestrian refuge area along the west building walls may be striped, provided it contains some form of barrier (i.e. curbing, post barricades) to prevent vehicles from overhanging onto pedestrian refuge area.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12/ D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1, .2

6. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
06/03/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied THE PLANTS PROPOSED AS PRESERVED IN THE EXCEPTION APPLICATION MUST BE LOCATED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IN LIEU OF THE AERIAL PHOTO. INCLUDE REFERENCE TO THE PRESERVED PLANTS ON THE GRADING PLAN.
06/03/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Per LUC TABLE 3.7.2-I, A 5' HIGH MASONRY WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE (COMMERCIAL ADJ. TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE)
IN ADDITION, SPECIFIC USES SUCH AS LOADING AREAS AND OUTDOOR STORAGE(SHEET METAL) MUST BE SCREENED WITH A 6' HIGH MASONRY WALL. REVISE ALL PLANS TO INCLUDE THE REQUIRED SCREENING.

ONE CANOPY TREE PER EVERY 33 FEET IS REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. ADD TREES AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NUMBER.
LUC 3.7.2.4

IDENTIFY AND DIMENSION THE PARK EASEMENT ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. DS 2-07

AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM THAT MEETS THE OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS IN DS 2-06.5.4 IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE AN IRRIGATION PLAN AND OR NOTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS.
06/11/2002 JAMES TATE FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied See engineering folder.
06/11/2002 JIM TATE ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all engineering, flood plain, and solid waste comments have been addressed.

Site plan
1. The sight visibility triangles on the plan are incorrect. The near side length should be 185 ft. Please correct. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 DS 3-01.5.3

2. The solid waste vehicle can not make the turn around the southeast corner of the building. The minimum required radius for PAAL intersections is 18 ft. DS 3-05.2.1.C.3.a

3. Steel pipes are required between the solid waste container and the enclosure's rear and sidewalls. Please show this on the dumpster detail. DS 6-01.4.2.C.2

Drainage Report
1. Retention is required for all new developments larger than 1 acre. The minimum erosion setback distance is 50 ft. Please include in the report the applicable pages from the approved Drainage Report for the Tucson Auto Mall stating that retention is not required and that the erosion setback distance is 20 ft. Tucson Code Sec. 26-7.1 Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual 2.2
06/11/2002 JIM TATE SANITATION REVIEW Denied See engineering folder.
06/12/2002 PHIL SEADER HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/31/2002 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed